It would be rather odd, obtuse, and/or disingenuous of davide_eu to interpret JonathanParker’s issue with the EU regulating Apple as meaning nothing should ever be regulated, don’t you think?I can't speak for the op, but I am pretty sure op meant that some laws/regulations are necessary in society. OP is using a hyperbole to illustrate a point that without any regulation, you will have a society that will run amok.
It’s more likely that davide_eu just wants Apple to be regulated, so they thought by stating the obvious that it somehow applies to and counters JonathanParker’s point, which it does not.