Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
https://blog.agilebits.com/2017/07/13/why-we-love-1password-memberships/

Posted today... no help for Windows users at this point. Try not to laugh too hard at their insistence that this isn't a money grab.
These worries are compounded by the fact that 1Password 6 for Windows was designed from the ground up to support 1Password Teams customers only (and then later expanded to include family and individual plans), and we are unsure how this adventure will play out on the Windows side of the world, so we haven’t made any public announcements about when support for standalone vaults will be added, if ever.

Hmmm... doesn't sound promising.
5vzn2NI.gif
 
I use both (I have a standalone license, have used 1password for about 5-6 years from memory)

1password gives you more control over password generation policy
you can open your vault from a HTML5 compliant web browser (so i can in theory get it via Linux)
i can store it wherever i like, i'm not tied to icloud
i can run 1password on a PC or Android device
1password does secure notes
1password has a better interface for multiple logins for a given site
1password can generate passwords for storage outside of 1password
1password has apple watch support - so i can display a set of passwords or other items on my watch (e.g., girlfriend's house alarm code)

etc.

there's nothing really "wrong" with Apple's keychain - but it has a bunch of limitations compared to 1password. primary one being that it is Apple device only.

IF 1password ever does mandate 1password storage server usage, i'll migrate all my stuff to Keepass in a heartbeat. I already use keepass for work stuff.

edit:
as to why agile are using their own service instead of icloud - the software is cross platform. iCloud is not, other than the really crappy windows version. 1password can currently use icloud, wifi device sync, dropbox and now their own server.

iCloud as the only sync method for 1password is just not viable.

The issue I have is that the version with the local vaults versus the subscription model have different user interfaces. The former one allows you to create nested folders as well as assign tags. The latter one has no folder support, but only the ability to assign tags. The difference may seem subtle or even redundant until you use it for a while. The hierarchical interface provided with nested folders makes organization much easier to me than just assigning tags to one flat, linear list of entries.
 
Unless that computer is air-gapped from the internet, it's only as safe as the hacking into is easy/difficult. And when somebody hacks into your computer, they can install a keylogger to extract the master key for your vault. When somebody hacks into, eg, Dropbox, they only have your encrypted vault which they then have to decrypt by brute force.

It amuses me how many people consider their own computer a safer place to store secrets than, for example, the Amazon cloud.
 
It amuses me how many people consider their own computer a safer place to store secrets than, for example, the Amazon cloud.

Same logic applies to numerous other servers/hosts out there - and whilst I don't dispute it, the theory may not apply so well to other vendors out there who may use other hosting platforms.

Regardless though, this sounds just like a push for the subscription model. As someone who has bought 1Password on multiple platforms now and am happily using DropBox sync, I would be most disappointed if that got taken away from me. I'm happy to pay for upgrades to new versions and other 'value adds' (eg the Apple Watch app was something which swayed me to pay), I do not like being locked in.

To AgileBits credit though, their support has always been great on the forums, and there is a way to export the data easily.
 
Quantum computing is just around the corner. What you say now takes a long time will be reduced to nothing. Put your database in the cloud, and you will be had, soon.

Once quantum computing rears its head, surely passwords will become irrelevant anyway. Anything will be able to break a password in seconds. Your password vault will be the least of your worries...
 
  • Like
Reactions: throAU
Not necessarily; it CAN work on via iCloud, but it's not necessary; you can turn it off in System Prefs > iCloud....

So, Keychain doesn't store your passwords in iCloud?


Yep, that is correct. It's much better that having your service and your data coming from the same company.
Still, if I'm forced to a subscription, I will probably consider LastPass.
[doublepost=1499863271][/doublepost]

1Password also works with Windows and Android.
[doublepost=1499863321][/doublepost]

My thoughts EXACTLY.
 
Currently Enpass does not offers local WiFi syncing although it is on their roadmap with no planned date . It supports cloud syncing through Dropbox, Google Drive, One Drive, Box, and Webdav/ownCloud. The Apple Store desktop version and IOS support iCloud. No other version has this support

eWallet by Illiumsoft does. Awesome app. Been using it over 10 years.

Guys,
Thank you so very much for this info!

eWallet promises to be a very good substitution for 1P. Thanks for suggestion.
https://itunes.apple.com/ca/app/ewallet/id411718305?mt=12&ign-mpt=uo=4
Good reviews, nice history of development, no subscription, yes wifi syncing!

With all these other mentioned app possibilities, 1P started already loosing its customers....
 
Guys,
Thank you so very much for this info!

eWallet promises to be a very good substitution for 1P. Thanks for suggestion.
https://itunes.apple.com/ca/app/ewallet/id411718305?mt=12&ign-mpt=uo=4
Good reviews, nice history of development, no subscription, yes wifi syncing!

With all these other mentioned app possibilities, 1P started already loosing its customers....
I have evaluated eWallet several time. It looks good and price is attractive. However import options are very limited. I have many years of data in my password manager and eWallet just doesn't import in a useful form. So if you are moving from another platform you may very well have many problems.
 
I have 1 Password on my Mac, on my i phone, and I just decided to set it up on my iPad Pro 9.7, NOPE when I downloaded it it was the regular version 6.0, yesterday it was listed as an update, which I allowed to progress, only to find out today it is SUBSCRIPTION ONLY! BASTARDS! Goodbye, 1 PASSWORD!!
 
I have 1 Password on my Mac, on my i phone, and I just decided to set it up on my iPad Pro 9.7, NOPE when I downloaded it it was the regular version 6.0, yesterday it was listed as an update, which I allowed to progress, only to find out today it is SUBSCRIPTION ONLY! BASTARDS! Goodbye, 1 PASSWORD!!
I have 1password on my iPad at 6.7.1 and it is not subscription. Now I installed a few months ago but it was already at 6 are you sure there is not a purchase option after you install? There was for me.
 
I have 1 Password on my Mac, on my i phone, and I just decided to set it up on my iPad Pro 9.7, NOPE when I downloaded it it was the regular version 6.0, yesterday it was listed as an update, which I allowed to progress, only to find out today it is SUBSCRIPTION ONLY! BASTARDS! Goodbye, 1 PASSWORD!!
It's not. If you paid for the pro version, you srill have it ($9.99). Even if you just got it today, it has this. I just took this screenshot just now and it shows the pro features still that do not require a subscription.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3448.jpg
    IMG_3448.jpg
    96.7 KB · Views: 126
It's not. If you paid for the pro version, you srill have it ($9.99). Even if you just got it today, it has this. I just took this screenshot just now and it shows the pro features still that do not require a subscription.
Right
 
Dear Agile Bits. No thanks, I'm not interested in your cloud. Give me a price for local DBs and I will continue to use your solution as I have for several years. We can part ways and I can upgrade to a newer version or renew my license in a year.
 
Perhaps I am missing something here, but what is the criticism actually based on? It seems that AgileBits denies sunsetting either local storage or one-time purchases.

As long as they continue to offer the option to store everything locally, I see no problem.

The problem is (as a one password customer myself) is that they have not upgraded the app for people who want local vaults synced to dropbox. You are stuck on version 4 while the cloud version is at v6.

I downloaded v6 and when I enquired they told me to downgrade back to v4. They said they didn't have a timeframe for supporting local vaults in v6 and I asked this over 6 months ago.
[doublepost=1500083710][/doublepost]
So you guys that are opposed to this are also opposed to services like LastPass and Dashlane ? Not the price but storing your passwords in the cloud.
My objection is paying $60 a year for storing passwords, compared to something like the utility of office 356 which is $120 a year but also gives you 1TB cloud storage. I have so many subscriptions, I'd like to keep a lid on it.

I'd maybe go for it if it was cheaper. I've had 1 password 4 for what seems like years now and only paid something like $30-40 for it on special.
 
It amuses me how many people consider their own computer a safer place to store secrets than, for example, the Amazon cloud.

Generally speaking, the only one that has access to your computer is, you...

In addition to being stored in AWS or elsewhere. The data has to be transmitted to get there.

Less hands in the pot. Less room for error.

Even you store data in the cloud. You still authenticate from your computer to access it. With that in mind. If your computer is not safe. It doesn't matter how safe cloud services are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulenspiegel
That press release is just a large flag saying "come and hack us".

I want them to get hacked. Someone make it happen.

It will humble them. For too long they've had their ego massaged by Apple bloggers.
[doublepost=1500087092][/doublepost]
These worries are compounded by the fact that 1Password 6 for Windows was designed from the ground up to support 1Password Teams customers only (and then later expanded to include family and individual plans), and we are unsure how this adventure will play out on the Windows side of the world, so we haven’t made any public announcements about when support for standalone vaults will be added, if ever.

Hmmm... doesn't sound promising.
5vzn2NI.gif

1Password for Windows has always been a tragique mess. Good riddance I say.
 
I'm not sure the so called security experts here make any sense at all. Your passwords aren't any less secure on a cloud based server than with the 1PassWord folks. Security comes from encryption of the files not the location of the files. Any server can be hacked it is a lot more difficult to decrypt a well encrypted file.

I would use a cloud password service, but its not just how the file is stored.
Storing of passwords in local vaults on each pc is a small target.
Storing millions of passwords and credit cards in one place is a big honking red target.
[doublepost=1500097335][/doublepost]
The encryption used by a password manager can be much, much stronger than the encryption used by say, a website login. A website has to process many, many password checks per second. Your password manager can use enough rounds of encryption so that waiting a second or thereabouts for it to unlock your database (due to processing the encryption) is good enough. But such heavy encryption means that brute forcing it is very slow.
That doesn't make sense to me.
Encryption anywhere can be as slow as you want it to be.
Decryption is what needs to be fast.
vs. brute forcing a stolen website password database (e.g., say macrumors gets hacked and their user passwords get downloaded)- which is often very quick to crack, because the encryption has to be FAST. two totally different scenarios. as web site password database can have millions or billions of attempts made on it per second with any modern GPU. a decent password manager database is millions (or more) times slower to break - because it was designed without the constraints of having to be FAST to respond to huge numbers of website hits.
Websites are designed to be hit by large numbers of views. Not all views are login attempts.
Whether it is a website or a password website, both have to have high availability.
Lets say a billion people log in to a million of sites. The number of logins is spread across those sites.
Lets say there are only 4 password sites, those billion logins are hitting just 4 sites and they'd better be quick
[doublepost=1500097539][/doublepost]
From anecdotal evidence, it would seem the majority of 1Password users already put their vaults into Dropbox or iCloud. Having passwords created on one device available on other devices is half the point of using a password vault.
I agree. There is another use but I think it is less used and that is wifi syncing which gives you passwords on all devices and no cloud required. But syncing in this case is limited to when your devices are together in the same place.
[doublepost=1500097735][/doublepost]
Once quantum computing rears its head, surely passwords will become irrelevant anyway. Anything will be able to break a password in seconds. Your password vault will be the least of your worries...
I wonder if quantum computing when it arrives will allow an infinitely large number of primes to be created that would take a quantum computer years to crack.
 
So I'm read into from the agilebits blog is is that 1Password 6 and 7 are ok but 1Password 8 will force all paid users into a subscription model.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave-Z
For me it's not about the fact they want to add cloud based services, they are the future pretty much.

It's the subscription model they and many other developers are pushing. It's gonna kill consumers in the long run.

And don't get be wrong, there are some software applications where it makes sense and it's better for the consumer. I.e companies that have a high staff turn over and hire via projects coming and going. Or people that only need certain software at certain stages of a project etc


But it's clear the market DOES NOT WANT subscription based services for everything.
 
1Password made a blog post
https://blog.agilebits.com/2017/07/13/why-we-love-1password-memberships/

"These worries are compounded by the fact that 1Password 6 for Windows was designed from the ground up to support 1Password Teams customers only (and then later expanded to include family and individual plans), and we are unsure how this adventure will play out on the Windows side of the world, so we haven’t made any public announcements about when support for standalone vaults will be added, if ever. Many Mac users worry that the same fate awaits 1Password 6 for Mac, and that we will remove support for local vaults and force them to pay again.

This isn’t going to happen. First, it would be evil to take away something you’ve already paid for. And evil doesn’t make for a Happy 1Password Customer, which is the cornerstone for a Happy 1Password Maker. It’s simply not who we are.

......

And you need not worry about 1Password 7 for Mac, either, as it will continue to support standalone vaults just like version 6 does today."
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: throAU
I believe them, 1Password 6 for Mac is fine....Even 1Password 7
"And you need not worry about 1Password 7 for Mac, either, as it will continue to support standalone vaults just like version 6 does today"

I'm betting 1Password 8 is a different story though. As a company, why offer these 2 models? One makes less money one makes more? The writing is on the wall.
 
The language suggests 8 will be when it gets enforced, though it doesn't guarantee it, but it seems a fair prediction. I imagine though, that they won't ever disable previous versions and force people to upgrade - they said themselves, you can't go around taking away something someone has paid for. Leave that to evil neer-do-wells like EA.

I wonder if quantum computing when it arrives will allow an infinitely large number of primes to be created that would take a quantum computer years to crack.

Yeah I was thinking that also, and you're probably right in the long term. I think the tricky bit will be the revolutionary nature of quantum, and that at first it'll probably only be available to the extremely rich and the NSA (assuming the latter don't have it already). So everyone will be exposed for a little while until quantum becomes affordable for everyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dilbert99
I want them to get hacked. Someone make it happen.

It will humble them. For too long they've had their ego massaged by Apple bloggers.
Wow. Just wow. I would never wish this on anyone or any company that is making a legit product. For the people who use the web for harm, them I don't care about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DoctorDoctor
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.