That's quite interesting. I didn't even know there was that functionality to begin with.feeze said:According to the security article that is the exact reason for the update.
They replaced the IM framework, not the iChat application. Whenever shared libraries are modified, Apple like to force a reboot since they can't know for certain if third-party programs are also trying to use it. It's a very smart move on their part since Mac customers aren't expected to realize that their computers run Unix, let alone know about library dependencies for all the programs they run.ifjake said:doesn't seem like it should be a reason to restart the system, but then again restarting the system doesn't seem like a reason to get upset.
gorkonapple said:I would not call this a security update as it's not really a problem of security unless you click on the link. It's more of a stupid user fix. How many stupid users would then click on the icon in the Finder??
Abstract said:Wow, Mac users get more frequent security patches than Windows does. Sweet!
macridah said:I don't mine this occasional security updates, I don't think most of the are critical, not like Microsoft. This patch installed smooth, and iChat is kinda snappier.
Abstract said:News is what MacBytes is for. MacRumors is for rumours, no? This isn't a rumor. Why even have MacBytes? I've seen no difference in the news that I've seen. I don't visit MacBytes because I don't have to.....it seems like all the important stuff is posted at MacRumors anyway.
swissandrew said:I'm one of the poor souls who can't now get iSight to work. Well I can, I get onto the floor, go round the back of Power Mac, pull out the firewire cable, go to 'restart', wait until iChat times it out 4 or 5 times (iChat won't force quit), restart, open ichat, slide round the back of the mac, plug in iSight again. Then it works.
I suppose if iChat stops working then it's more secure - no one can send me one of those dodgy links![]()
gorkonapple said:I would not call this a security update as it's not really a problem of security unless you click on the link. It's more of a stupid user fix. How many stupid users would then click on the icon in the Finder??
At least Apple are working on fixes to prevent stupid users, and things you'd never think of; unlike some nameless other nameless vendors who can't seem to close all the holes.soosy said:I was thinking the same thing. It almost borders on sacrificing functionality just to protect stupidness....
On the other hand it's a very very minor thing that I didn't even know existed so oh well![]()
toughboy said:is it normal for an operating system as solid-rock as Mac OSX to have to be updated for security this often?
daveway00 said:I didnt think iChat needed a patch, to me it works fine.
toughboy said:is it normal for an operating system as solid-rock as Mac OSX to have to be updated for security this often?
yellow said:If there are that many vulnerabilities found in pieces/parts of the OS, definitely. I'd rather have move updates to contend with that coping with a compromised machine.
Tuttle said:Wrong.
There is no excuse for userland patches to require a system restart. A logout, maybe.
brap said:At least Apple are working on fixes to prevent stupid users, and things you'd never think of; unlike some nameless other nameless vendors who can't seem to close all the holes.
...although maybe the guys working iChat at Cupertino would be better used getting that Tiger to us a bit quicker![]()