The US has this thing about personal responsibility... I know, crazy, right?/QUOTE]
LOL.
You think "Personal responsibility" exists...?
Remember that person from the u.s. a few weeks ago who blamed everyone but himself for buying "I am rich app": "Wwwwhaaaaaaa - its not my fault, its everyone elses fault that I bought it!".
Or, how about those fat people from the u.s who tried sueing McDonalds for "making them fat"...
Again - LOL - personal responsibility.... some people should understand the notion of 'personal responsibility'.
--
I'm wondering if the subscription format is being forced upon Apple by music labels, and in return, Apple would get some concessions - such as more DRM free music?
If SJ is against subscription music, then I'm surprised Apple would go ahead with it..
No, I think he was saying that you can't discount a rumor just because its been around for several years.![]()
Dude whats ur problem and u missed the point, it says in the news that itll be US Store only so i assume no one from out of the US could just sign up for it only. So i was wondering if we could still use it with the retail boxWhat the hell is up with eurpeans and those anti-trust issues? why cant they just stop bitching and learn to live life.....
I know. kid must know know that 1080p IS blu-ray and IS the highest out there and wont be another one for quite some time... 1080p as yet to fully set in.
whats with people and rolling their eyes at nonsence
i'm getting me a iphone tomorrow. 16gig, screw that i'm getting an 8
So you are saying all rumors come true the older they get?![]()
In fact, the only anti-trust SO the EU sent to Apple that I can remember was about iTunes pricing in Europe being higher than the US, and indeed, some countries (the UK) had a higher price than other parts of Europe (the Eurozone). It makes sense for them to ask Apple about it, because it's in the interest of European citizens. And as a result, Europeans are enjoying cheaper music than before the EU intervened.
Look at the Mac Mini, and the Cinema Displays...![]()
I'm in with the iTunes Unlimited...
As soon as i can afford it.
Why can't they do monthly?????
Other subscription services with DRM use said DRM to prevent you from burning the songs to disc.I don't think I'm really revealing any national secrets by passing along the information that was given to me ages ago...burning off a copy of DRM'd songs onto cd and then re-uploading them as mp3's breaks the DRM. Granted this is a time and labor intensive process but if the subscription model is really a "lease" on the music for as long as your subscription is active, why couldn't someone follow the process above to "own" the music permanently?
The last time I was on campus (last week) I was able to see many peoples entire iTunes libraries and listen to them via bonjour. As far as "owning" the music, you never have owned it, ever. The same way with software. You are paying for the right to USE it. You do not OWN your copy of Leopard, or Windows, or Office. Read the EULA. Recall grade school; and "don't copy that floppy" nonsense they had use watch. One of the points was that you do not own the software you are using, you are simply paying a fee to use it on your own computer. Nothing has changed.
I'm willing to bet the music companies will poo poo and say this is illegal. Still, might do it for a year and find some way (can't imagine how) to capture the audio for all the songs I want but haven't bought yet. Do this with a group of friends and watch the cost come down.
Hmmm, if I think of doing this wonder how many other teenagers will do this?
Am I the only one who thinks "renting" music is the worst idea ever?
What happens with all that music you love and want to keep? You will need to "rent/get" over and over again.
I would do this in a heartbeat if I can "get" music for as long as i choose to keep the file ... even if I stop paying the devil (RIAA) to keep him at bay.
Apple doesn't do monthly. it's much easier to make sure that someone is paying once a year than 12 times.