Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Pretty impressive they came out with M1 support on day 1.
I bet they had good support from Apple.
 
I don't think any app could possibly do that and it doesn't fit the workflow that photographers seem to follow. I do keep a lot of my RAW's, but I have delivered JPG's and they no longer live in Lightroom or Capture One. I certainly didn't want to transition my previous edits over. If you are dropping Lightroom for anything, you'll have to bite the bullet or keep on moving forward. I've done this from Aperture to Lightroom, then from Lightroom to Capture One. Each time over about 6 weeks so it was a smooth transition with plenty of overlap so not to be caught with my pants down.

I know many photographers who have bitten the bullet and stuck with Adobe LR when they went subscription. And the reason is large libraries of photos with non-destructive edits not being able to be translated to another editor/DAM. I have every single RAW I've made since the RAW format came out (if memory serves, that was with my Canon 20D dSLR way back in mid-2000s).

A year ago I bit the bullet and went LR subscription and never looked back. Yeah the $10/mo irks me. But in the big scheme of things it's not a big deal, especially if you take photography seriously.

The good news is, way back when Aperture and LR came out around 14 years ago, I spent a lot of time evaluating both simultaneously, knowing I'd be where I am today with a ton of photos. And having concerns Apple wasn't going to be in the professional photo editing/DAM business longer than Adobe. Also, at the time, Aperture had a kludgy method for doing local/brush edits that was not non-destructive and required making a huge tiff in the process - which was insane.

So glad I chose to go with LR. And not Aperture.

Also... I really like the relatively frequent updates Adobe has added to LR's editing tools, which have been killer.
 
Last edited:
Would have been interesting to hear, how fast it ran before the optimization ;)

But 3x faster is crazy. Might be the biggest performance jump on Macbooks ever. And the price didn't change at all.

I would categorize that under the usual marketing chatter.
I'm sure they got some good support from Apple during development, and the people at Affinity are smart enough to give a little something back.
They probably moved one filter from CPU to GPU and it got a lot faster that way. I even believe them when they say this is due to the shared memory architecure.
Good work nevertheless!
 
I love Affinity apps, but 3x faster probably won’t make me draw any better.
That's not a hardware or software problem, but a liveware problem! We're all in the same boat there I'm afraid.
The six steps of the creative process:
1. This is awesome!
2. This is difficult!
3. This is ****!
4. I am ****!
5. This might just work...
6. This is awesome!
 
all AMD and Intel have to do is follow the design ideas of the memory and GPU on a chip and design their own M1 Killer

Hand it over to Microsoft who already has 92 percent of the OS market around the world and APPLE gets left in the dust with just 7 percent of the OS market.

Being different can leave you in the dust not wanting to work together with Windows and active directory.

Having your computers in corporations and businesses is where the money is at.

Being different and no compatibility using an ARM M1 will shrink Apples usage percentage

Work together, compatibility is where it's at

Apples chip designs will get copied. then the Mac is history.
 
Spoken by someone who hasn't watched the Android market for, what, the last decade? Why haven't the other ARM makers done this and used your so-called "compatibility and copy" method so Android could just win?

Most people I know buying Macs aren't buying them to run Windows. Thus, compatibility is in the file types and how the apps run them. PPC could run all the same **** Windows could run, because once companies supported open standards, everything just ran. You didn't need some Windows-only app to view/run/edit some file.

"Being different can leave you in the dust not wanting to work together with Windows and active directory."

You can always tell when someone is arguing from a "BuT WiNd0wS" mentality.
 
Continuing, you DO know that iOS is compatible with macOS, right? And they run (well, up until now) on different architectures. I swear Windows-only guys, who pretend Macs only worked because they had Intel chips, don't understand the game.
 
Going forward, will all Intel based mac only run new programs in Rosessta II ??, or will it run natively?.
Rosetta 2 is only for running Intel software on Apple Silicon Macs, not for running AS software on Intel Macs.

In the near future most apps will have a universal binary that runs natively on both Intel and AS. Eventually the software will only be built for Apple Silicon, but this is likely to track the ending of macOS updates that support Intel hardware. So by the time the majority of software is no longer supported, you won't have the OS to support the new software anyway.

Intel Macs should get updates for quite a few years, and will continue to run after that. In the past I have used a Mac productively for years after it was no longer supported in OS updates.
 
Until Capture One can automatically translate all of the non-destructive edits I've made over the years since LR came out, on 100,000+ images, it's sadly a non-starter for me. I'm fine with LR RAW processing, and because I've edited so many photos with LR, it's pretty much muscle memory getting to where I want to go.
I switched to Affinity + CaptureOne about a year ago. You can, and I do, keep Lightroom around, without subscription. It gives you the option to open your catalogs and export your pictures. Sure, you can't edit them anymore but you don't lose your edits that way.

Love that Affinity is so quick to update. Although they REALLY need to update the way the floating interface items work. I'm constantly fighting the floating palettes. They seem to get in the way all the time, it's infuriating! Especially on a laptop that occasionally gets attached to an external monitor. They seem to be ignoring Apple's UI guidelines on these.

I'm a bit more worried about Capture One though, they will probably take their sweet time updating for Apple Silicon. I hope I'm wrong though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
Affinity Photo is a great App, used that to replace Photoshop three years ago. I have not looked back.
Curious about how to manage your photo library/workflow with Affinity Photo? What app do you use to view your photo library with photos you have edited with Affinity Photo.
 
how do they know it runs 3 times faster on new hardware?

The new M1 Macs just got released to the public yesterday for pre order.

Did they get their hands on a new M1 Mac before any of us?

Something fishy here. I want to see the lab test results bashing Intel and AMD chips.

They also had access to a Developer Transition Kits in which they could develop and test their apps and its performance against previously released hardware. They just could not talk about it due to Non disclosure agreements.
 
Curious about how to manage your photo library/workflow with Affinity Photo? What app do you use to view your photo library with photos you have edited with Affinity Photo.

I used to use Aperture, which I loved. I kept using it until I upgraded to Catalina, now I use Apple Photos. From there I can edit my photos in On1 Photo RAW or Affinity Photo.
 
Last edited:
They also had access to a Developer Transition Kits in which they could develop and test their apps and its performance against previously released hardware. They just could not talk about it due to Non disclosure agreements.
As well as their apps already run an Apple iOS Silicon so probably very little changes needed. My guess is they already had a shared code base between their windows/iOS/Mac versions
 
  • Like
Reactions: japasneezemonk
Did they get their hands on a new M1 Mac before any of us?

Almost certainly. Affinity were one of the developers showcased during the 'One More Thing' event (if you remember that annoying montage, switching between loads of developers). If memory serves me right, they were the ones who said it took a day to migrate their app to work on AS.
 
Place your bets if you think Adobe InDesign, Illustrator and Lightroom Classic are going to get support in a year.
 
how do they know it runs 3 times faster on new hardware?

The new M1 Macs just got released to the public yesterday for pre order.

Did they get their hands on a new M1 Mac before any of us?

Something fishy here. I want to see the lab test results bashing Intel and AMD chips.
There were developer Mac Mini's out there running the 12X or whatever. So 3X faster with that beta M1 or 3x faster with the shipping M1. Either way impressive as all get out.
 
One down, one to go. Now just crossing my fingers for Capture One so I can migrate to the M1 chip
 
all AMD and Intel have to do is follow the design ideas of the memory and GPU on a chip and design their own M1 Killer

Hand it over to Microsoft who already has 92 percent of the OS market around the world and APPLE gets left in the dust with just 7 percent of the OS market.

Being different can leave you in the dust not wanting to work together with Windows and active directory.

Having your computers in corporations and businesses is where the money is at.

Being different and no compatibility using an ARM M1 will shrink Apples usage percentage

Work together, compatibility is where it's at

Apples chip designs will get copied. then the Mac is history.
Oh dear... have you not seen all those lists of eminent sages, oracles and prognosticators who, over the years, have confidently predicted that "Apple are doomed"? They all have one thing in common: they were wrong. $2 trilllion dollars worth of wrong. You just joined their club. Here's your hat.

Being different seems to be working just fine.

 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.