Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I would like to have a file system on my iphone but I can live without it. I agree about swype. I used it on my S4 and other android phones, why because the stock keyboards were not good enough so I had to look for better alternatives. I don't care that the iphone doesn't allow me to install alternatives because the stock keyboard works perfectly fine. If it aint broke then don't fix it I say.

No way you're gonna say iPhone keyboard is a lot better than Android ones -- at least on iOS 7. It's very easy to hit the wrong character. Also, it doesn't have a caps lock (only 1-type shift), while looking at the keyboard I don't know if the characters are in upper or lower case. Swyping on a big screen phone like SIII, S4 or Note is really fast. I agree that earlier versions of Samsung UI (TouchWiz) it was not so good, but from Jelly Bean 4.1.2 it's very hard missing a character.
 
No way you're gonna say iPhone keyboard is a lot better than Android ones -- at least on iOS 7. It's very easy to hit the wrong character. Also, it doesn't have a caps lock (only 1-type shift), while looking at the keyboard I don't know if the characters are in upper or lower case. Swyping on a big screen phone like SIII, S4 or Note is really fast. I agree that earlier versions of Samsung UI (TouchWiz) it was not so good, but from Jelly Bean 4.1.2 it's very hard missing a character.


How to Enable Caps Lock on iPhone, iPad

http://news.softpedia.com/news/How-to-Enable-Caps-Lock-on-iPhone-iPad-193186.shtml
 
No way you're gonna say iPhone keyboard is a lot better than Android ones -- at least on iOS 7. It's very easy to hit the wrong character. Also, it doesn't have a caps lock (only 1-type shift), while looking at the keyboard I don't know if the characters are in upper or lower case. Swyping on a big screen phone like SIII, S4 or Note is really fast. I agree that earlier versions of Samsung UI (TouchWiz) it was not so good, but from Jelly Bean 4.1.2 it's very hard missing a character.

Just double tap the shift button and you have Caps Lock. It's been like this since 2007 man. :eek:
 
Just double tap the shift button and you have Caps Lock. It's been like this since 2007 man. :eek:

If you re-read his post, more carefully this time. I think he knows Shift double tap on iOS keyboard = CAPS LOCK. He complains about how users cannot instantly determine whether the lock is active or not just by looking at the letters alone. The keyboard letter stays capital no matter what.

It makes sense that the letters should toggling along with caps lock activation. So yeah that's something which needs improvement.
 
You can't redefine definitions to fit your argument.
There are no definitions in natural language. It is all just intuitively understood conventions. And the meaning of words is shifting. If you try to come up with written down definitions of what words are supposed to mean, you are doomed to failure.

For example, try to give a short definition for personal computers. It needs to include Macs but exclude iPhones. A hybrid like the Surface Pro might be a PC, but a PlayStation 4 definitely isn't a PC. Nevertheless its parts need to be PC parts by your definition. Good luck with that.

So where is the border between Tablet-PCs and Tablets? What needs to be in it and what needs not to be in there? Use your intuition. You know it, when you see it.
 
Because what's the biggest difference between an ARM and x86? Not much, really. They both use the exact same parts in the exact same way. There's nothing particularly special about a tablet that makes it considerably different from a traditional PC from a purely technical standpoint.
ARM is RISC and x86 is CISC.

And with different instruction sets come size, power, heat and speed differences. For that matter, what is the difference between a motorcycle engine and a car engine? Not much really. There's nothing particularly special about a bike that makes it considerably different from a traditional car from a purely technical standpoint.

Only now x86 CPUs become more and more adapted to mobile use cases. (Putting a car engine in a bike.) Still the benefit and detriment of x86 is its backward compatibility to a huge catalogue of legacy software. Sure it is nice to run old software, but nothing of it was developed with phone batteries in mind.

So while ARM isn't necessary for a tablet, ARM forces you to rewrite all your software and on the way, optimize it for mobile. That is also the reason why tablets can't have USB ports. Too much USB peripherals are not optimized for low power consumption. So they need to be blocked by omitting that port.
 
June 29, 1975 Wozniak tested his first working prototype, displaying a few letters and running sample programs. It was the first time in history that a character displayed on a TV screen was generated by a home computer. (Wikipedia)

A lot of us here are old enough to remember early computer history, since we lived it. We were all homebrewing the same things. (My first computer was a homebuilt electronic analog sliderule around 1964.)

The technology to display typed characters on a TV was well known and written up in major magazines like Radio Electronics, starting with the TV Typewriter in 1973. Any engineer worth his salt would've read those articles.

People were already using a TV as display on other home computers via terminal devices like the TV Typewriter II (first sold January 1975).

He also didn't demonstrate his Apple I to the Homebrew Computer Club until July 1976. The S-100 bus Cromemco Dazzler color graphics board had already been demonstrated to the Club in November 1975, which shows that everyone was thinking along the same lines.

If what he claims is true and Steve Wozniak was the first one to see a letter appear on screen right after he hit a key, than no – home computers would never have become personal without Apple, which wasn't founded until a year later.

When his book said, "It was the first time in history anyone had typed a character on a keyboard and seen it show up on the screen right in front of them.", that was of course wildly incorrect as written.

Video displays and keyboards had existed on standalone computers for years before he made his homebrew raster output circuit. Witness the 1973 Xerox Alta. So again, his claim needs more qualifiers on it.

Things don't just happen at the same time. One is always the inspiration for all the others.

On the contrary, in the history of home/personal computers, lots of things were invented at nearly the same time. The reason was that everyone suddenly had the same access to low priced microprocessors, which allowed anyone with talent to build microcomputers.

As I noted above, expensive computers had been doing far more graphics for years. Once chip prices had come down to where hobbyists all over the world could afford to duplicate such features, they did.

In fact, a month BEFORE the board-only Apple I kit went on sale in July 1976, Processor Technologies had shown off their ready-to-buy all-in-one personal computer design, the Sol-20, which also had a video circuit built-in (and expansion bus).

1976_sol_20.png

Apple sold about 200 of their Apple I. Processor Technologies sold 10,000 of their Sol-20. (Unfortunately PT was badly mismanaged and soon folded. Still, many still consider it to be the first all-in-one home computer, as the Apple II didn't come out until 1977.)

The nail in the history coffin comes from Woz himself, in an article he wrote for the 1984 book, Digital Deli:

"These turned out to be common features for the personal computers that have come out since that time. We weren't quite the first to offer a keyboard and video output, but we were close."

Steve Wozniak

This is not to take away the things he did. Just pointing out that he was not alone. Everyone had much of the same ideas. The personal computer was on its way no matter what.
 
Last edited:
As much as people like to say the iPhone hasn't changed over the years, think about how much it really has! I would love to know if Steve was expecting this :)
 
Yes I do. I never knew that. You would think with all their resources and their large international customer base that Apple would improve their support for other languages.

Nah, it's not a pleasure to use in German. Prediction is totally off and gets more in your way than helping you. I have the impression that on the English keyboard, you can pretty much bang in these words and the keyboard gets you right 99% of the time.

At least on Windows Phone 8 or Android you get multiple suggestions which you can choose one from very quickly. granted - english is a pretty simple language compared to German or even other languages
 
The technology to display typed characters on a TV was well known and written up in major magazines like Radio Electronics, starting with the TV Typewriter in 1973.
Than he, who has written the article in Radio Electronics, was the one to inspire all the others. Every idea comes down to one person, than someone else picks up the idea and carries it one step further. Don Lancaster can claim ownership of the TV Typewriter. But a booklet in a magazine is still far from selling a full-functional general-purpose computer to individuals not hobbyists.
He also didn't demonstrate his Apple I to the Homebrew Computer Club until July 1976. The S-100 bus Cromemco Dazzler color graphics board had already been demonstrated to the Club in November 1975, which shows that everyone was thinking along the same lines.
After reading the same magazine. That's no co-invention. Of course everyone thinks along the same lines after seeing the thing from someone else. And a color graphics board is still not the same as a general-purpose computer. These are all only the steps that led to the invention of the personal computer further down the road.
Apple sold about 200 of their Apple I. Processor Technologies sold 10,000 of their Sol-20. (Unfortunately PT was badly mismanaged and soon folded. Still, many still consider it to be the first all-in-one home computer, as the Apple II didn't come out until 1977.)
So we are still at selling home computers, not personal enough. Eh?

earlyapplead.png


It's a personal computer only when you are marketing it as such.
This is not to take away the things he did. Just pointing out that he was not alone. Everyone had much of the same ideas. The personal computer was on its way no matter what.
Some kind of cheap home computer was on its way no matter what. But the personal computer? Probably not! Xerox more than proved its inability to make use of the GUI and Microsoft needed the Macintosh to learn how to do it, like it was the Egg of Columbus.
 
Last edited:
I remember working for Verizon at the time and selling against it. I had a bunch of things memorized like that it doesn't do this or that (mms, ringtones etc) and after awhile it started to get annoying because everyone was constantly talking about it.

Then the 3G came out and my friend was showing me some iTunes videos while we were bored and he let me touch it and play with it and then I was like "forget this" and switched from Treo to iPhone. Lol.
 
Same Ivy,,, same T-Shirt

The Best Team Ever

Image

It's funny how much people change in 7 years... except Sir Ivy, he still looks the same... and wears the same T-shirt...

What a history making day that was! I mean iPod and iPad had their moments... but iPhone... wow.
 
That's exactly what it did. When I first saw the iPhone, I wasn't like "this is a watershed moment in the history of humanity, I've never seen anything like this in my entire life, and nothing will ever be the same again". It was more like "wow, Apple made a really cool and sleek smartphone". I was impressed with it, and instantly wanted one, but I didn't think it did anything completely unprecedented and brand spanking new. It just did a lot of stuff better.

I had been playing with touchscreens for awhile by that point. On screens at various banks, on some smartphones, and on my Nintendo DS. Multitouch was, to me, the next step up from that.

Agreed. For me, it was more like: "Now that's how you do a smartphone." It wasn't just the phone part, either. It was everything.

Thankfully, everyone else saw that too and ran with it, to the point where even the most basic smartphone today is way, way ahead of what it was like to use a phone back then. Apple forced companies to rethink how people use their devices; to think of "a better way", even if it wasn't the same as Apple's.

They've been doing that in every category they play in. It is in that respect that Apple is both innovative and truly, truly great. Not the what, but the how.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.