Shareholders Approve Disney's $71.3B Acquisition of Fox as Deal Enters Final Stages

Discussion in 'iOS Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jul 27, 2018.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    One week after Comcast officially bowed out of the bidding war for 21st Century Fox's entertainment assets by ceding to Disney, shareholders of both Fox and Disney have today approved Disney's $71.3 billion acquisition offer for Fox (via The Wall Street Journal).

    At two separate gatherings this morning in Manhattan, both company's shareholders were said to have "voiced their support" for the acquisition in brief meetings that lasted less than 15 minutes.

    [​IMG]

    There are still a few hurdles before Disney officially acquires 21st Century Fox's entertainment assets, mostly related to approval from overseas entities. Specifically, Disney is waiting for the European Union and China to grant approval for the acquisition, as well as "more than a dozen" other international territories.

    Still, with the United States Justice Department approving the acquisition last month (with one condition for Disney) and now the shareholders voting to approve, it's believed Disney's acquisition of Fox will be done by early 2019.

    News of Disney's interest in Fox dates back to last December when Disney initially announced its bid to acquire Fox for $52.4 billion in stock. Comcast entered with its own $65 million cash offer for Fox's assets, leading to Disney's increased $71.3 billion cash and stock bid in June. At the time that it bowed out of the running for Fox, Comcast CEO Brian L. Roberts congratulated Disney and its CEO Bob Iger and commended the Murdoch family and Fox "for creating such a desirable and respected company."

    Disney's plans for Fox line up with its intent to launch a streaming service in late 2019, showcasing a lineup of content from Walt Disney Animation Studios, Marvel, Pixar, Star Wars, and likely a back catalog of films and TV shows owned by Fox, further enticing customers to sign up. Under the agreement Disney will acquire Fox assets including Twentieth Century Fox Film and Television Studios, Fox-related cable and international TV businesses, Fox's 30 percent stake in Hulu, the film rights to the X-Men and Avatar franchises, and more.

    Disney has already launched its first streaming service in the form of ESPN+ this past spring, granting subscribers access to live sports, original shows and films, studio programs, and an on-demand library of content. Ahead of the debut of its main streaming service a little of a year from now, Disney has warned Netflix users that it will begin removing its TV shows and films from Netflix before its own platform launches.

    New Disney-owned movies have still appeared on Netflix at a decent rate this year -- including Star Wars: The Last Jedi, Coco, and Thor: Ragnarok -- but a few have begun to disappear, including the impending removal of Pixar's Finding Dory in August.

    A Disney streaming service filled with Fox content will be a direct competitor to Apple's upcoming streaming service, also believed to see a launch at some point in 2019. Apple's partners in the original TV content space include Oprah Winfrey, M. Night Shyamalan, J.J. Abrams, Kumail Nanjiani, and more.

    Article Link: Shareholders Approve Disney's $71.3B Acquisition of Fox as Deal Enters Final Stages
     
  2. jontech macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2010
    Location:
    Hawaii
    #2
    Han shot first

    Cost 71b to make sure this happens!
     
  3. jonnysods macrumors 603

    jonnysods

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Location:
    There & Back Again
    #3
    To quote Gollum:

    "She always needs to feed"

    That's Disney.
     
  4. BWhaler macrumors 68030

    BWhaler

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    #4
    The only good I can see from this is now maybe Disney can release the original Star Wars movies without all the Lucas digital butchering through the years.
     
  5. blacktape242, Jul 27, 2018
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 27, 2018

    blacktape242 macrumors 68000

    blacktape242

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2010
    Location:
    Sacramento, CA
    #5
    please continue that Alien saga you *****!!!!
     
  6. BlandUsername macrumors regular

    BlandUsername

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2016
    Location:
    In yer server room, fixing the tubes
    #6
    From a Content standpoint, Disney is just too PC, and just too proud of their offerings. they have many pieces of content I refuse to buy, rent,or even watch (Looking at you ESPN) over their cost and PC stands. Shareholders win, we all lose.
     
  7. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #7
    Would not be shocked if Lucas destroyed all of the original masters.
     
  8. GizmoDVD macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Location:
    SoCal
    #8
    why would Disney do that?

    no, really. Why would they nor even care?
     
  9. calstanford macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2014
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    #9
    Oh America and your love for monopolies and duopolies. Customer choice really scares you. Competition and fair prices too.
     
  10. rpmurray macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2017
    Location:
    Back End of Beyond
    #10
    China ought to take this chance to withhold approval unless Disney agrees not to make any content critical of the Chinese government, any former, current or future Chinese leaders, the Chinese people, China as a country, or anything related to Chine both past and present and into the future.
     
  11. agsystems macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2013
    #11
    don't know about the releasing unmodified versions - what we will definitely get are 4k versions of the remaining stars movie - so far only the POS Last Jedi has been released in 4K.
     
  12. Kabeyun macrumors 68000

    Kabeyun

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Location:
    Eastern USA
    #12
    Why would they do that? Because we want it? And what does buying Fox have to do with it, since they’ve owned Lucasfilm for almost six years?
     
  13. EdT macrumors 68000

    EdT

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    #13
    More people have grown up with the altered versions than with the original theatre releases. For them the altered versions ARE the real ones.
     
  14. Gashole macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    #14
    Has anyone yet mentioned the possibility of an X-Men/Avengers movie?

    /sarcasm/
     
  15. EdT macrumors 68000

    EdT

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    #15
    Fortunately, monopolies are always beneficial and don’t end up as self serving money centric businesses that don’t care because being a monopoly means that they don’t have to.
     
  16. ApostolisApo macrumors member

    ApostolisApo

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2015
    Location:
    Gothenburg
    #16
    So you ignore racism, homophobia and hate speech and choose to be annoyed by PC?? :rolleyes::rolleyes:


     
  17. lostczech macrumors member

    lostczech

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    #17
  18. tayalva macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 11, 2015
    Location:
    Huntington Beach, CA
    #18
    I’m confused... what does this have to do with Apple?
     
  19. EdT, Jul 27, 2018
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2018

    EdT macrumors 68000

    EdT

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    #19
    Disney is not Snow White when it comes to racism and sexism:

    https://www.cartoonbrew.com/artist-...s-john-lasseter-is-still-employed-162146.html


    https://www.cartoonbrew.com/artist-...-description-groped-john-lasseter-155073.html
    --- Post Merged, Jul 27, 2018 ---
    ????

    Why would we care how Disney portrays the Chinese government?

    Especially for family/animation. China is such a big market that I don’t think if you had videos of China killing acres of puppies that Disney or any other entertainment company would say a word because their product would be banned from distribution. And it wouldn’t require a formal document that could be used against either side.
     
  20. m0sher macrumors 6502

    m0sher

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2018
    #20
    One word MONOPOLY

    Just wow, the special interest on what huge mergers are allowed or not that are aligned to current political preference.
     
  21. fairuz, Jul 27, 2018
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2018

    fairuz macrumors 68000

    fairuz

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2017
    Location:
    Silicon Valley
    #21
    I don't think there can really be a monopoly on movies. People watch stuff if it's good and watch nothing if it's not*. As for news, that's one thing the US has always had a hands-off policy on. Except somehow we have NPR.

    * I guess they've been wanting crappy superhero movies for the past several years, unless you count Incredibles.
    --- Post Merged, Jul 27, 2018 ---
    Not gonna lie, I have no idea what anyone is talking about with these "real versions" or why it matters whether Han shot first. It's not like the storyline is deep enough to deserve all this nitpicking. I watched only the Special Edition ones on VHS, and I only remember one CGI thing looking really out of place, otherwise great movies.
    --- Post Merged, Jul 27, 2018 ---
    By "PC" you mean "politically correct," right? Unless the old Looney Tunes comes back (would be awesome but never gonna happen), the family-friendly genre is clean. It takes skill to make that and have it actually be good, and Disney does the best job.
     
  22. EdT macrumors 68000

    EdT

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    #23
    Most fantasy stories aren’t terribly complex when it comes to storylines but there is nothing wrong with a simple story that is well told.

    As far as altering storylines, I’m not sure what your age is or what movies or shows you like, but for example let’s pick Harry Potter. Imagine first the movies exactly as they are. Now imagine that 4 or 5 years from now they re-edit and reshoot the 2nd movie, Chamber of Secrets, so that it blatantly and unambiguously tells you the outcome of the final movie. More or less, that’s what happens in Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi. The big reveal that occurred in Empire is wiped out, as far as dramatic effect goes. That’s what upsets people who’ve seen the unadulterated versions. It significantly changes the story, simple as that story may be.
     
  23. arkmannj macrumors 65832

    arkmannj

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Location:
    UT
    #24
    So... is Firefly (& Serenity) one of the IP's Disney would now own?
    If so, I wonder if Disney would have any more interest than Fox had in making more quality content in the Firefly universe.
     
  24. fairuz, Jul 27, 2018
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2018

    fairuz macrumors 68000

    fairuz

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2017
    Location:
    Silicon Valley
    #25
    Thing is, if they rereleased the Harry Potter movies, which I did watch as they came out while I was growing up, I wouldn't watch them again because I already saw them. So I wouldn't mind.

    Better example is Star Trek since the only thing I'm a fan of is Star Trek ToS, and I don't mind that they've redone Star Trek in ways that actually change the old characters, even though I don't like the new ones very much. At worst just disappointed that the new movies aren't good enough that I want to go see them.

    I'm actually not sure which reveal you're referring to in Star Wars. Asked a friend who knows a lot about movies, and he didn't know about it.
    --- Post Merged, Jul 27, 2018 ---
    What does this have to do with China? I think Mulan was pretty positive ;)
     

Share This Page