Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Sky is designed to float unobtrusively over what you're doing, so AI is just a click away. It understands what's on your Mac's screen, and is able to take actions using the apps that you have installed. It's able to help with answering questions, writing, planning, coding, and much more, and it can be customized with prompts, scripts, and shortcuts.

Everything these days is designed to "float unobtrusively over what you're doing" so we get popups on our popups after our popups over other popups pop up so Pops can pop up while he pops up in case he hasn't seen any pop ups while watching the other pop ups animating their pop ups.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wx_Man
I know, I am probably too old for this new tech wave, but I find it creepy to allow whatever ai app to go through my screen/mails/other stuff.. probably will lead to me being unemployed in few years/months, as ai is according to “all” new necessity for anything
 
  • Like
Reactions: StingRaySpeed
I will wait for 10 more years for Apple to make it free and built into the macOS so I can test it out

At the end of the day will disable it in settings or via terminal because of privacy concerns🤣🤣
 
Computers are extension of Self.
Self send the email to>
Self send URL to Xperson>
Self Open said web browser to X-pages.
About time!
--
Aw privacy always come up as you only think you have clothes on while sitting there!
They know more about you than you know about you.
You been spied on for how many years now on the internet?>
Emperor has no Clothes.
 
It will be interesting to see if this requires a separate LLM subscription to work properly. I see a lot of apps these days that mirror the old "batteries sold separately" model, where even after you pay monthly for the thing it still doesn't work unless you also pay monthly for other stuff.
It‘s right there in the article? Works with GPT and Claude, which have no free API access.

So you‘re essentially double paying for this app: for one you need to pay the API pricing of your choice and two, you pay the Sky app subscription.

on topic: Apple‘s next purchase? They need to fix their on screen awareness.
 
But it's only being left behind if you're actually missing out on something that would definitely have been useful to you had you given it a chance. For example, are people who prefer sitting down and reading physical books being left behind by the proliferation of audio books?

Regarding the current trend of "All AI Everything", I think huge part of the challenge facing the wide adoption of these new AI tools is that so many of them feel like technologies in search of broad, easily-monetizable use case when their strengths are best suited almost exclusively to the enterprise world and office professionals. Most people simply don't need a tool to write emails for them, or to text their friends on any sort of regular basis, and certainly not to the extent that they would pay a subscription for that.
Not a good example. Although it is better for someone’s eyes to listen to audiobooks, it’s not the same as reading. Left behind would maybe be the guy who praises his physical books like they were godgiven while demonizing e-readers.

I use open ai a lot when looking for information or have it write some code and afaik that’s what most people do and also what most use the internet for. I never needed it to write ann email for me.
Anyway, maybe read the article again. It’s not just about writing some emails or texting friends FOR you.
We are just at the beginning of what AI will be useful for.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: StingRaySpeed
It‘s right there in the article? Works with GPT and Claude, which have no free API access.

So you‘re essentially double paying for this app: for one you need to pay the API pricing of your choice and two, you pay the Sky app subscription.

on topic: Apple‘s next purchase? They need to fix their on screen awareness.
It's still actually not clear. Sky could include API costs into their subscription pricing rather than having users subscribe separately and bring their own API keys to plug in.
 
Which remains a superior name for such a system.

Still have to explain to people it's not a shortcut on the desktop (except when you create a shortcut on the desktop to run a Shortcut published by the Shortcuts App) and it's not cheating at anything (it's defining a series of procedures to accomplish a task, which only sometimes feels like cheating).

And then they already had the Automator brand name sitting right there... completely unchanged from when it was introduced in 2005.

Well it's changed by having more extensibility over time. Technically it doesn't do that much exciting, it's simple code blocks right? I wish they had a node based editor for this stuff.
 
This is awesome. Game changing.

Can't wait. Great idea! For those expressing privacy concerns here, it is easy solvable with a ON/OFF switch, so you can type your credit card number when needed (or whatever) with no fear.

It will surely be part of macOS in the future.
 
with all this sticky AI popping up everywhere not only privacy is an issue. We’re storming at a wall called electricity crisis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StingRaySpeed
This is what Apple should have done with AI in their OS's.
Yep. Why couldn’t they have, after all these years, just made Siri and Automator work magically together ? Or since they had to purchase Siri to get a local chatbot and had to purchase Workflow, now renamed, Shortcuts, to have something better, I guess, than Automator, then why haven’t they worked on integrating Siri into Shortcuts to make something like Sky….which they’re probably going to to buy anyway?
 
If this was a part of Apple Intelligence, I think people would be a lot happier.
May be this is the plan. The company already made a lot of money, selling Shortcuts to Apple. Why not this one, too? With everyone talking about "agentic AI", such a thing is currently missing in Apple's vision of Apple Intelligence.
 
This is what Shortcuts should be. “I want this to do this” etc. However, I cannot see how someone not technically minded can figure out how to use Shortcuts and make it work I’m no Luddite, but I gave up on Shortcuts as whatever I made didn’t work, didn’t work the way I want it to, or don’t know what Shortcuts would be useful for me

It is incredibly deep for something that Apple officially backs - it's at odds with how shallow a lot of their software services and features are.

It is definitely not straight forward to create shortcuts and AI isn't very good at helping with them as it's not raw code and they don't appear to have lots of data on them - so it can guide and help a little but it's often wrong about how to get something working.

I've built quite a few lately though - today I made a shortcut where I highlight a bunch of numbers right click and tap "sum" and it'll either output the total to the document i'm in or copy it to the clipboard so I can paste it somewhere - quite handy when i'm not using a spreadsheet app with some numbers.

But really it should now be trained into Apple's LLM so there's a text box at the top, you tell it what you want to do and it builds the shortcut for you (if it's possible and tells you if it isn't and why) - similar to how it works with IFTTT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 211
This is a very hard pass for me. I find the Shortcuts app to be somewhat frustrating to use as well, so I question how well / user friendly it would be anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 211
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.