I bet if he fights this on the basis of "reasonable expectation" he'd win.
He was buying an Apple Product from an AUthorized Apple Dealer, he was given verbal information that infered to a reasonable person that their policy [14 day] was the same as Apples, there was no information verbal or otherwise that disputed this until AFTER the sale
He was buying an Apple Product from an AUthorized Apple Dealer, he was given verbal information that infered to a reasonable person that their policy [14 day] was the same as Apples, there was no information verbal or otherwise that disputed this until AFTER the sale