Eizo doesn't use IPS in all their displays, yet they are regarded as some of the best in the market. Apple isn't even using a current IPS panel.
MVA and PVA are right there with IPS these days. Especially considering the displays are using newer panels unlike Apples old S-IPS panel. Not to mention the ghosting, pink cast, etc etc.
You are also limited to a single digital DVI connection. Whereas most displays have 2-3 inputs.
It's like I said, research, it's amazing what you'll learn. Mine may be as dated and as out of touch as people seem to feel the ACDs are.

Before I bought mine, I read reviews and comments mainly from digital photography sites as color accuracy is paramount to those guys and gals. Of the displays that people seemed happiest with, I found the ACDs to be the choice for me. I also get a hefty discount through my employer. A luxury other may not have.
I also know the Eizo's don't come cheap their ColorScan 24" comes in at about $5000, but color reproduction is ungodly wonderful. They're "lesser" model the FlexScan 24" is almost twice as much as the 23" ACD.
I think if the OP wants a second opinion, I'd try digital filmmaking or photography sites like DVinfo.net or the forums at
Luminous Landscape.
I'll admit that I had hesitations before I bought my 23", but I have them no more. I bought my 23" about a month ago and have no ghosting, no pink casting, though I've read about folks who do. I'm completely satisfied with mine. It reproduces colors faithfully and accurately and images are crisp and clear.
On the other hand, OP, copious amounts of hooch is very appealing.