Yes, I wonder if we'll laugh about this attitude (where so many people like pornography, yet its so frowned upon) in a few years...
I seriously doubt this will happen, but then as I say that ... I realise that really depends on what "pornography" is, both to you and to me.
That's the problem with this whole thread is
it's built on a vague and subjective "non-definition" (or two).
Pornography, in the sense of that awful, soul-destroying, negative crap that is in the back room at your local brick and mortar video store will likely be far
less popular in any healthy future for the human race, than it is today.
On the other hand, depiction's of nudity and sexual activity will likely be common and people *will* truly laugh out loud at the idea that anyone ever thought that this kind of stuff should be illegal.
only my opinon of course, YMMV
No I don't think so, its just not necessary. But I would like to see Apple sell all Music Videos, TV shows, and Movies with a Explicit option (Or in the case of certain movies an Unrated version) like they do with music. Its a sad day when I buy a Nine Inch Nails music video about censorship only to find its the censored version of the video. (I ended up finding the uncensored one for free on the NIN site).
I sympathise with you about buying something that seems one thing and is then another, but I am still against those labels.
I think in this day and age, when the very worst swearwords are commonplace, that to worry about "explicit" lyrics is just nonsense. It doesn't help or protect anyone and it's just a sop to the Christian community.
The proof is in the opposite label that iTunes uses ..."clean."
"Clean" basically means "christians can listen," or perhaps, "Disney approved." These labels indicate that they are targeting a specific market, American Christians.
Outside of the USA there simply is no big unified group of people who all agree on what's "clean" and what's "explicit."