Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MoreAwesomeDanU

macrumors 6502
Dec 4, 2010
264
113
I guess the biggest irony in all of this is that — the only reason signals can offer free E2E encryption chat (which is also offered by WhatsApp btw, FB does not monetize WhatsApp through ads), is because the founder Brian Acton sold WhatsApp to FB for 22billion dollars.

So at end of the day, all this is still powered by FB ad money... Some serious circle of life s**t :)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Zeus65

Pakaku

macrumors 68040
Aug 29, 2009
3,138
4,453
I wonder if I'm the only one who actually wants to see these ads in action, just to see what the algorithms have to say about me
 

quarkysg

macrumors 65816
Oct 12, 2019
1,227
814
I was talking with friend of mine about his new job in one of the top popular beer company, and he send me a picture of 0% beer - on Signal.
Next day I saw a few ads of that beer on Facebook.

Worth to add - I haven't google or anything like this about the beer or that company.

Ye, privacy :)
The most likely explanation is that you downloaded the image of the picture and that the server that served the picture to your device captured your IP address. That action alone is probably enough to link the picture to you by Facebook.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeadingHeat

LeadingHeat

macrumors 65816
Oct 3, 2015
1,044
2,608
Uhm... instagram? We were chatting on Signal app ;) and no, I did not save it into my camera roll.
Instagram periodically scans your photos and uses it for ad data. That’s why I brought it up :) but yeah that is interesting.

I don’t know how exactly their algorithms or data collection works but all I do know is that after being behind the curtain of Google at my previous employment, it’s literally scary how much they know about you. Are you and your partner trying to get pregnant? They know that. Are you going to start looking for a new couch? Yeah they know that too. Past borderline creepy haha.
 

Abstract

macrumors Penryn
Dec 27, 2002
24,837
850
Location Location Location
I searched for a few articles about Dogecoin, just because I know nothing about crypto.

I searched in the DuckDuckGo browser, using the DuckDuckGo search engine.

I’m seeing lots of ads about investing in crypto, ETFs, etc. ??‍♂️
 

quarkysg

macrumors 65816
Oct 12, 2019
1,227
814
I searched for a few articles about Dogecoin, just because I know nothing about crypto.

I searched in the DuckDuckGo browser, using the DuckDuckGo search engine.

I’m seeing lots of ads about investing in crypto, ETFs, etc. ??‍♂️
If you clicked on the search links and read the articles of those links, that's likely where information were collected about you reading up on crpyto.
 

MacBH928

macrumors G3
May 17, 2008
8,327
3,719
Next should be Google. I like how everyone treating FB as the "bad cop" and Google as the "good cop" . Google is even worse than FB.
 

MacBH928

macrumors G3
May 17, 2008
8,327
3,719
I searched for a few articles about Dogecoin, just because I know nothing about crypto.

I searched in the DuckDuckGo browser, using the DuckDuckGo search engine.

I’m seeing lots of ads about investing in crypto, ETFs, etc. ??‍♂️

if you actually visited those site, then they installed cookies on your system to follow you around the web. It was not DDG.

Search for something on DDG but don't click any links, see if you get ads for that. Also you should be using adblocker, uBlock Origin for any browser, 1Blockr or AdGuard for Safari , Wipr or 1Blockr for iOS or just using Brave Browser that comes with a built in adblocker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zeus65

dsut4392

macrumors member
Jun 29, 2006
89
56
Uhm... instagram? We were chatting on Signal app ;) and no, I did not save it into my camera roll.
Have you given insta/FB access to your address book, and do you have your friend's new email in there?
 

Abstract

macrumors Penryn
Dec 27, 2002
24,837
850
Location Location Location
If you clicked on the search links and read the articles of those links, that's likely where information were collected about you reading up on crpyto.

if you actually visited those site, then they installed cookies on your system to follow you around the web. It was not DDG.

Search for something on DDG but don't click any links, see if you get ads for that. Also you should be using adblocker, uBlock Origin for any browser, 1Blockr or AdGuard for Safari , Wipr or 1Blockr for iOS or just using Brave Browser that comes with a built in adblocker.
Sure, but the DDG browser has a “Fire” button that gets rid of all saved data.

It also blocks trackers automatically. See images below.

That, and I’m running iOS 14.5 with tracking turned off for everything.
 

Attachments

  • BD715843-AE29-4302-AE56-D1DD1B8A2AB4.jpeg
    BD715843-AE29-4302-AE56-D1DD1B8A2AB4.jpeg
    204.6 KB · Views: 37
  • 4EEB9F06-FAC5-4A2A-BB39-FBACF7DEE9B4.png
    4EEB9F06-FAC5-4A2A-BB39-FBACF7DEE9B4.png
    216.4 KB · Views: 42

quarkysg

macrumors 65816
Oct 12, 2019
1,227
814
Sure, but the DDG browser has a “Fire” button that gets rid of all saved data.
The information about you are likely collected at the server end, not at your computer’s end. As long as you clicked on the link and the request reaches the server, they already have some information about you, e.g. your IP and it is accessing a web page of a particular topic.
 

lazyrighteye

Contributor
Jan 16, 2002
4,097
6,318
Denver, CO
I don’t know how exactly their algorithms or data collection works but all I do know is that after being behind the curtain of Google at my previous employment, it’s literally scary how much they know about you. Are you and your partner trying to get pregnant? They know that. Are you going to start looking for a new couch? Yeah they know that too. Past borderline creepy haha.
I too worked closely with G in another life (around 2010ish). And what they were capable of, and with whom they were openly collaborating, and sharing, some eleven years ago(!), was breathtaking. And not at all in a fun way. There was a particular meeting where they said "we don't talk about this publically, but..." and then proceeded to stagger those in the room with their capabilities, agenda, and perspective. The look on people's faces in that room is something I can't unsee. After walking out of that meeting, I removed every Google app from my iPhone. When I got home that eve, I removed any shred of G on the rest of my devices and I haven't installed them since. Today, I actively leverage G as little as is possible. I can't recommend ditching them, in every possible way, more. Obviously, millions of people could give two $#!%s (or are too ignorant) about their digital rights. But for those that do, heed.
 

Dan15

macrumors newbie
Feb 14, 2021
6
0
I don't think they even actually tried to run the ads. One of the screenshots Signal posted literally said there were 0 rejected ads. The warning screenshot they shared was from an unrelated billing issue.

Google don't sell your data onto 3rd parties like Facebook does though, they sell advertising slots, whilst also providing services which (I for one) find very beneficial and save me a lot of time and money. It's a trade I am willing to make.
That's not really accurate... Google and Facebook use exactly the same business model of targeted advertising based on data they collect. There's really not anything Facebook does that Google doesn't do.
 

Zeus65

macrumors newbie
Sep 27, 2019
16
20
Nah, never gonna install Signal! Watch when Signal needs money, they will sell your info! Just like any social platform!
Sorry man Signal is a non for profit, which had huge capital, its encryption technology is used in whatsapp itself and they have no data on you track. Even your phone number is stored in encrypted form just to let other users know you've joined. Signal itself does accept donations. When the recent influx of 50 millions users happened they didn't suddenly need more money, just took them a day or two to get the service back to reliable levels.
 

Zeus65

macrumors newbie
Sep 27, 2019
16
20
My government (Austria, Europe) has access to Signal chat logs just like they have to SMS messages or our bank accounts, or most anything else. Really no point in using Signal. We are like farmed animals. In fact, economically we are their farmed animals. All we have to do is read the newspapers, buy and do what we are told in newspapers, and vote for whomever the newspapers tell us to vote for. I guess FB and Twitter both act and count as newspapers too.
I would love to see how they did this? I think governments can only block the use of signal possibly, not actively monitor chats if the service is usable.
 

Zeus65

macrumors newbie
Sep 27, 2019
16
20
Once again, Apple doesn't make money selling your personal data. I don't know about MS.
As my friend puts what is the product, In world of Apple the pretty expensive product is the device you're buying and then the subscription to services that they hope you're continue subscribing to. But at the end of the day you get what you pay for. Anytime something is free we need to ask ourselves why is it free. If facebook charged everyone for the use of facebook with a monthly fee I doubt they'll make as much as they do now where the product is us. Same thing to google, Google drive, google photos and gmail. This is why I'll never use Android because you still end up being the product.

This is another reason I've started moving all my email stuff to a paid for service. Fastmail and I love it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kabeyun

Zeus65

macrumors newbie
Sep 27, 2019
16
20
I guess the biggest irony in all of this is that — the only reason signals can offer free E2E encryption chat (which is also offered by WhatsApp btw, FB does not monetize WhatsApp through ads), is because the founder Brian Acton sold WhatsApp to FB for 22billion dollars.

So at end of the day, all this is still powered by FB ad money... Some serious circle of life s**t :)
Very true, the startup of signal was paid for by the sale of WhatsAapp, WhatsApp's encryption actually uses the same signal encryption. Its the other stuff WhatsApp is collecting and that will be shared with Facebook that has me worried. Signal for the win.
 

Kabeyun

macrumors 68040
Mar 27, 2004
3,412
6,350
Eastern USA
Anytime something is free we need to ask ourselves why is it free. If facebook charged everyone for the use of facebook with a monthly fee I doubt they'll make as much as they do now where the product is us. Same thing to google, Google drive, google photos and gmail. This is why I'll never use Android because you still end up being the product.
Correct. As the proverb goes, “If you sit in on a poker game and don’t see a sucker, get up. You’re the sucker.”

And as Tim Cook said, “I think everyone has a right to ask, how do companies make their money? Follow the money.” Anyone think Facebook and Gmail are free? Don't worry, you’re paying. You just don't realize how. Apple makes their billions selling products and services, not you. Anyone who doesn't see that is either pointing out false equivalencies, has some sort of Apple grudge, or has the monogram MEZ.
 
Last edited:

MacBH928

macrumors G3
May 17, 2008
8,327
3,719
Sure, but the DDG browser has a “Fire” button that gets rid of all saved data.

It also blocks trackers automatically. See images below.

That, and I’m running iOS 14.5 with tracking turned off for everything.
are you seeing those ads in the DDG browser or in other apps?

its no use if you were browsing signed in a Google account or FB account, as you browse the internet logged in the tracking data is saved to your account not your local device. If you login again they will serve the ads again.
 

warp9

macrumors 6502
Jun 8, 2017
450
641
Similar happened with a friend of mine and Carwow. I talked to him about it (in person) and the next day he was getting adverts for it, even though he had never heard of them and never looked them up....
This is a known thing that happens with android phones. Facebook has an agent listening for keywords that can be monetized. Some will say it's not true but the evidence is overwhelming. Expect this to be the next big facebook scandal.
 

warp9

macrumors 6502
Jun 8, 2017
450
641
One of the things I can select, as an advertiser, is to ask Facebook to show ads to people whose friends have visited a page within x days. So are you sure the friends of the friend (I guess in this scenario that's you) also did not visit the web page around the time you had the conversation about it? I have also heard some anecdotal stories where we suspect the microphone access is doing this, but just making sure, because there are lots of other ways to generate the scenario you describe.
You can test the microphone thing yourself for 100% proof but it only works on android, not ios.

1. Make sure you do not have the microphone disabled in settings.
2. Open the facebook app, then close it.
3. Put the phone down, then have a "fake" conversation about something you have never talked about before but is very specific and "monetizable", like a product or vacation.
4. Open the facebook app again (it's possible the data is cached and requires the app to be open to upload).

Within the next hour or day, you will most likely see an ad related to what you talked about. Keep in mind, it's competing with other ads so it may not show up soon, but having you talking about it increases the bid rate substantially.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.