Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Simplistic 'Yo' Messaging App Soars in App Store Charts, Proves Vulnerable to Hacking
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
the spike coincides with the front page story on CNN/Money:
http://money.cnn.com/2014/06/18/technology/mobile/yo-app/index.html
maybe a paid product placement?
Altho, as much as I want to hate on this stupid app, it would address several cases where texting is cumbersome:
When I go visit a friend at his office, he has to come open the security-controlled door. Currently, I text "here", but a single button-press "Yo" would convey the message.
Same works for anyone who has to let visitors in an apartment building, etc. There are lots of cases when meeting up with ppl, that we type some perfunctory message to let them know we have arrived, or are ready to leave, etc. The words are really unnecessary when we are expecting a message of that type. A simple "Yo" would convey the idea.
Like I said, I still want to hate it. But I might get it. ha.
Last edited:
Didn't apple solve this with read reports?
you see they've read it. They don't reply. You assume they are busy. Seems very simple
For the most part, yes they did solve it. The issue with the proposed use of Yo is that it requires you to open a DIFFERENT app to send that Yo. Also, there is already a way to acknowledge you received a message from someone if you don't have read receipts as an option. You simply say "K".
Now, I have seen something similar on Twitter and App.net where a user will favorite and then un-favorite a message as a way of letting the sender know that they saw it. But again, this is all done in-app using the tools already provided. If Yo were so necessary, you'd see an "Ack" button added to messaging apps that manually "acknowledges" a message.
Last edited:
This is the social equivalent of a fart app. Unfortunately it's so easy to develop for iOS now that these fart developers think that they can break into the social media scene. Even more frightening is that the general public loves this stuff and investors give them millions!
This has inspired me. I'm going to learn iOS development. I designed and launched my first app the other day (didn't code it). I've had a lot of mediocre ideas over the years—and apparently that's all you need to be successful now. Hell, I've even had a couple of good ideas. Imagine if I had implemented them. I wouldn't be sitting here in my office writing on some forum about Apple stuff. I'd be sitting on a secluded beach writing on some forum about Apple stuff.
This has inspired me. I'm going to learn iOS development. I designed and launched my first app the other day (didn't code it). I've had a lot of mediocre ideas over the years—and apparently that's all you need to be successful now. Hell, I've even had a couple of good ideas. Imagine if I had implemented them. I wouldn't be sitting here in my office writing on some forum about Apple stuff. I'd be sitting on a secluded beach writing on some forum about Apple stuff.
Yes, I'm over 30
Thanks for the explanation but I still don't get why kids wouldn't use their existing messenger (say Whatsapp) to send the "Yo".
These apps also offer emoticons, which I hear are popular with teens and tweens, very quick to send a response or "mood" gauge in just one emoticon.
Why yet another app? Whatsapp etc. also offer pop-up messages and doesn't seem much slower to use.
Yes, I'm over 30
Thanks for the explanation but I still don't get why kids wouldn't use their existing messenger (say Whatsapp) to send the "Yo".
These apps also offer emoticons, which I hear are popular with teens and tweens, very quick to send a response or "mood" gauge in just one emoticon.
Why yet another app? Whatsapp etc. also offer pop-up messages and doesn't seem much slower to use.
Because Whatsapp is not hipster enough, that's why. I can't really understand, but everyone's trying to be hipsters nowadays
I originally thought this app was beyond stupid, but I've actually thought of a use case that make sense for me.
I'm a "technical advisor" to several television shows and staff are distributed throughout our building. Instead of having to call my desk phone (which I'm not always at, and sometimes can't hear ringing with headphones on) or walk over to try to find me they could "yo" me with minimal effort and I could go to their office to see what the issue is.
Still, a million dollars in financing seems a bit much - what do they need the money for?
I'm a "technical advisor" to several television shows and staff are distributed throughout our building. Instead of having to call my desk phone (which I'm not always at, and sometimes can't hear ringing with headphones on) or walk over to try to find me they could "yo" me with minimal effort and I could go to their office to see what the issue is.
Still, a million dollars in financing seems a bit much - what do they need the money for?
I was going to goof on this app with creative examples of other inanity, but gave pause that someone might move on the idea, code it, and earn millions in financing.
So yet more malware hacking rubbish apps on APPLES app store!
Where are all the Mac Rumours posters that constantly slam Android for these types of apps now then? Forgetting the exact same thing happens on Apples app store I imagine, which is worst considering Apple are supposed to vet each app before posting it up.
Where are all the Mac Rumours posters that constantly slam Android for these types of apps now then? Forgetting the exact same thing happens on Apples app store I imagine, which is worst considering Apple are supposed to vet each app before posting it up.
That would be your editorial opinion about the app, which is not the same thing as a description of the app's functions.
----------
See above. In fact if anything is simplistic, it's your understanding of the word's meaning.
App Store quality control is simply non-existent. You only need to consider that there are 1.2m apps available to realise that.
I'd much, much rather see 12,000 apps which were 'guaranteed'.
99% fake reviews, i tried it and it sucked, dont bother
Agreed. Wonder why MR is supporting it. If anything this exposure is what is making it money.
Im going to stand by the description of this app as simplistic (for trying to boil social interraction down to a single word), though I will agree that this is an editorial judgement. That being said, the concept of simple is relative, making your description of the app as simple an editorial comment as well.
As for misunderstanding the definition of the word, having spent my professional life embroiled in the complexities of the English language, I wont pretend that the usable definition isnt/wont changing/change. But if youll consult your nearest dictionary, I think youll find my understanding of the term is fine.