Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I got the one about the great-grandfather's wife's daughter's daughter last night while I was driving and trying to dictate a text in hands free/eyes free mode with my BT headset. I couldn't believe what I was hearing. Sometimes it's a good idea to make your point by example, but this wasn't one of them. I had to sit through the intentionally long-winded and confusing response while I was driving and trying to get some important things done. Aggravating, and not at all entertaining or amusing. In no way did that help achieve my goal, and it implies their needs trump the user's needs. What was Apple thinking? Why would they build something into their product that essentially mocks the user?!?
 
There's no practical way at this point in time that a computer can consider interpreting long sentences.

Lets break this down. What do you mean by interpret? Do you mean accurately understanding your words or using them to find data?

For part 1, it's not necessary to have the entire dictation to start using context to predict what you are saying (for when the language processing fails). If you use Google instant search you'll see that in action. Or even better, use Google Now and see words pop up as you say them. No need to have the whole dataset.

For part 2, plug in a very long query into Google search and see how long it takes to deliver a result. Be sure not to blink. I'll give you an example. Paste this into Google:

Overly long unformatted statements present fellow editors a dilemma: spend excessive time parsing out what you mean or being mildly rude in not actually reading what you wrote. It is more collegial and collaborative to take an extra few moments to distill your thoughts into bite size pieces. Traditionally, the phrase too long; didn't read (abbreviated tl;dr or simply tldr) has been used on the Internet as a reply to an excessively long statement. It indicates that the reader did not actually read the statement due to its undue length.[2] This essay especially considers the term as used in Wikipedia discussions, and examines methods of fixing the problem when found in article content. As a label, it is sometimes used as a tactic to thwart the kinds of discussion which are essential in collaborative editing. On the other hand, tl;dr may represent a shorthand acknowledgement of time saved by skimming over or skipping repetitive or poorly written material. Thus the implication of the symbol can range from a brilliant and informative disquisition being given up due to lack of endurance, interest, or intelligence, to a clustered composition of such utter failure to communicate that it has left the capable reader with a headache; judging this range is very subjective.

And before you say Google Voice Search isn't like Siri, I'd point you to Knowledge Graph which basically does the same thing but integrates it into Google Search. It's better because you get a result no matter what. If it doesn't have an exact result, you have the search results without having to do something else.
 
Last edited:
I actually had a pretty difficult time getting it to do this and ended up reading a random paragraph. How long are your freaking questions people?!?!

Just read the Strunk quote to it. Sometimes Siri will respond with the same quote and the request to make it shorter.

(That should be a hint that these cute messages are too long, Apple.)
 
I hope they add my favourite quote for those times when Siri answers a tricky question correctly or negotiates a purposely annoying conversation with poise and then the user says some thing like 'well done Siri'. Siri could respond with a quote from Picasso - If the wise man approves; bad. If the simpleton applauds; worse.
 
Just because it's a little bit quicker, and has slightly better voice recognition,

Are you serious, "a little quicker" and "slightly better voice recognition"?? Google Voice is mind-blowing, watching it transcribe in real time as I'm talking, correcting words in real time based on the context of later parts of my speech -- all with crazy accuracy. It's borderline scary.

Siri was groundbreaking and fun for a while, and I still use it to set reminders and such, but it's so far behind it's not even comparable.
 
I use Siri a lot when dictating text messages... The other day when I tried to dictate a long one that was important she gave me some stupid quote telling me to try again in fewer words. I didn't think it was cute or cool, I found it obnoxious and infuriating that Apple cant handle the data so they come up with a stupid way to try and be silly about it. This is stupid, not helpful.

Apple engineers: CHANGE THIS.

Ah, so I'm not the only one to run into this.

I don't have a problem with Siri reminding people to be concise when asking questions, but it is rediculous to apply this when a text is being dictated, especially given the fact that the content of the text was transcribed perfectly and all that had to be done was placing into a text to be sent.
 
I really don't understand comments like this.

Just because it's a little bit quicker, and has slightly better voice recognition, people are making over-the-top statements like this.

In my experience, Siri answers a much broader range of questions, gives far more comprehensive and in-depth answers (à la Wolfram alpha), has better natural-language processing, and has some nice easter eggs in it.

I value those more than slightly faster response times and slightly better voice recognition.

Just the other day while driving, I had to go to a location different from the place I had keyed into my GPS and didn't want to meddle with the GPS while driving. Picked up my iphone, said the shopping mall's name (I didn't know where the mall was located except for its name) like a gazillion times before Siri understood and brought a list of addresses based on the name but none exact, and didn't allow me to select one from that list for some reason. Fed up, I fired up the Google app and pronounced the mall's name the same way I did with Siri and boom, it knew what I was referring to, brought out the address and gave me the directions in an instant and I was on my way.

You are grossly underestimating "slightly better voice recognition". Being a non-native English speaker, this is kind of a big deal for me, more than you think, and Google gets what I am saying 8 out of 10 times, Siri 2 out of 10.

And mostly, Google has far, far more information at its disposal than Apple has now. Data and information processing is their life. If you'd used Google you'd probably know they do a heck of a job with their search results of late(summarizing results on the side, bringing out weather, sports scores and so on..). It won't be long before Now trumps Siri by a huge margin.

You can keep supporting Apple despite its weak show with Siri, or accept Now is going to be a superior alternative sooner than later and realize Apple should raise its game if it needs to compete on this front.
 
Upset business user

From the start, I have successfully enjoyed using Siri to dictate business texts and emails. I now feel like a child dealing with a passive agressive adult who came up with a new rule, but won't tell me exactly what the new rule is. Thanks apple for taking away a great feature in a completely patronizing way.
 
Thanks for rubbing it in, we don't get this "fabled" sun in England. Ive bought a snow lance and some decent snow foam, just waiting for the weather to change so I can clean the bleeding car.

Oh and the cost of £1.39 a litre for fuel :confused:

Your post made me smile! Yeah, I know England is not the sunny country but it's a beautiful place still. :)

----------

From the start, I have successfully enjoyed using Siri to dictate business texts and emails. I now feel like a child dealing with a passive agressive adult who came up with a new rule, but won't tell me exactly what the new rule is. Thanks apple for taking away a great feature in a completely patronizing way.

Have you tried it since the update? I was under the impression that Siri only responds asking you to reduce the amount of words you use if she doesn't understand what you're asking, no?
 
Just the other day while driving, I had to go to a location different from the place I had keyed into my GPS and didn't want to meddle with the GPS while driving. Picked up my iphone, said the shopping mall's name (I didn't know where the mall was located except for its name) like a gazillion times before Siri understood and brought a list of addresses based on the name but none exact, and didn't allow me to select one from that list for some reason. Fed up, I fired up the Google app and pronounced the mall's name the same way I did with Siri and boom, it knew what I was referring to, brought out the address and gave me the directions in an instant and I was on my way.

You are grossly underestimating "slightly better voice recognition". Being a non-native English speaker, this is kind of a big deal for me, more than you think, and Google gets what I am saying 8 out of 10 times, Siri 2 out of 10.

And mostly, Google has far, far more information at its disposal than Apple has now. Data and information processing is their life. If you'd used Google you'd probably know they do a heck of a job with their search results of late(summarizing results on the side, bringing out weather, sports scores and so on..). It won't be long before Now trumps Siri by a huge margin.

You can keep supporting Apple despite its weak show with Siri, or accept Now is going to be a superior alternative sooner than later and realize Apple should raise its game if it needs to compete on this front.

Really if you have a problem with that, hold down the sentence which it misinterpreted and correct it. Not that hard.

And as to the content Siri gives, I'll stand by my opinion that it has far superior content. And I'm not going to admit that now has better content, because this is my experience.
 
Are you serious, "a little quicker" and "slightly better voice recognition"?? Google Voice is mind-blowing, watching it transcribe in real time as I'm talking, correcting words in real time based on the context of later parts of my speech -- all with crazy accuracy. It's borderline scary.

Siri was groundbreaking and fun for a while, and I still use it to set reminders and such, but it's so far behind it's not even comparable.

So you still say that it goes a "but faster". Or maybe my response should be "holy crap, google now is a whole two seconds faster!" I wouldn't mind waiting an extra couple of seconds for far better content.
 
What horrible excess. I imagine this will confuse a fair number of people.

I can seriously imagine that if people like my grandparents were to use an iPhone and received that message, they might think they had received a text message from someone with the quote from Thomas Jefferson.

This is in a way analogous to the skeumorphic design elements in Mac OS and iOS. It's there to be cute, but it distracts from simplicity.

I like Google's search on iOS simply for the fact that it works on my 4th generation iPod touch.
 
Understandable but the problem with humans is, they talk too much. Many times I completely ignore a post that is laden with endless text. Siri and Google voice are only suppose to assist simple questions, not address soliloquies. :)

Some people do, but here's a nice long question that it would be nice if Siri could answer:
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    237.8 KB · Views: 508
I discovered this last week, right after coming down with some horrible sickness. A few minutes after I finished puking my guts out, I decided I should email my boss before trying to get some sleep. I didn't feel like typing, or even opening my eyes.

*ding*
"Send an email to [my boss]"
*ding*
"OK. What would you like it to say?"
*ding*
"I just came down with some kind of stomach bug, so I won't be coming in. I'll give you an update sometime tomorrow to let you know how I'm recovering."
*ding*
"A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts. William Strunk. Can you ask me that again, in fewer words?"

Infuriating.

Siri can dictate two sentences in Mail.app, but not in the lockscreen. In the lockscreen, she lectures you about brevity using literally 500% more words than necessary.
 
I discovered this last week, right after coming down with some horrible sickness. A few minutes after I finished puking my guts out, I decided I should email my boss before trying to get some sleep. I didn't feel like typing, or even opening my eyes.



Infuriating.

Siri can dictate two sentences in Mail.app, but not in the lockscreen. In the lockscreen, she lectures you about brevity using literally 500% more words than necessary.

This! Exactly this! It's so hypocritical and ridiculous that she won't dictate a simple 2 sentence message but replies with a myriad of useless words
 
This! Exactly this! It's so hypocritical and ridiculous that she won't dictate a simple 2 sentence message but replies with a myriad of useless words

You got that right enough!

Siri effectively has been disabled. BS baffles brains ... and in this case its even baffled its own 'brain'

I went from iPhone 4 to 4S for the much vaunted Siri ... at the time it was the main feature as well as the speed and improved camera resolution (yawn)

But its been pretty poor at best TBH .. and so much for beta improvements. Now its actually been crippled ... not improved in that time.

Sadly I fear ... like the British weather at present .... its not looking good or indeed for New (post Jobs) Apple if this is a sign of their innovative prowess - and I do think it really is on the slide ... I really do ... :confused:

And as Private Fraser might say... we're all doomed ... DOOMED!

Fraser.jpg
 
Ridiculous. Not everyone has a short attention span. I read long posts, books even. Siri and Google's voice recognition adapt to humans, not the other way around. Good luck with the future of Siri by requiring people to dumb everything down to 'simple questions'.

The attention span is not the point here, it’s about being efficient, overly long posts normally carries very little value, matching the writer’s ability of concentrating his expression.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.