Become a MacRumors Supporter for $25/year with no ads, private forums, and more!

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
54,251
16,095



According to a report [Google Translate of cached version] from Korean publication Digital Daily that was published and then pulled (via G 4 Games), Apple has inked a deal with LG to provide flexible, plastic OLED displays for the company's iWatch product. LG is allegedly the sole supplier of the 1.52-inch panels for Apple's rumored smart watch device.

continuous.png
Image from Apple's "bracelet" with wraparound display patent
LG is said to be starting mass production of these flexible panels starting in July 2014 with an initial target volume of 2 million units, and Apple chose these panels because they are thin, light, and provide adequate brightness with minimal power consumption, insiders claim. LG introduced the display technology in early 2013 and incorporated the panel in its curved LG G Flex smartphone, which was unveiled in October of last year.

Besides a flexible display, other rumors have suggest the iWatch will be launched in the second half of 2014 with wireless charging as a possible feature. OLED has been a commonly rumored technology for the iWatch, but other sources have pointed to different display sizes for the device, including the possibility of separate sizes in the 1.3-inch and 1.6-inch ranges for men and women.

Apple is said to be continuing to work through issues with battery life, display technology, and manufacturing on the iWatch, with the device said to feature biosensors and mapping features and run a "full" version of iOS.

The reason for the removal of today's report about the claimed deal with LG is unclear, and with no rumor track record for Digital Daily it is difficult to assess the reliability of the claims.

Article Link: Sketchy Report Claims LG to Provide Flexible OLED Displays for Apple's iWatch
 

DrManhattan

macrumors member
Dec 27, 2013
47
0
Makes sense. Samsung makes better displays, but they steal your technology. Pick your poison.
 
Comment

KdParker

macrumors 601
Oct 1, 2010
4,793
998
Everywhere
Looking forward to the design possibilties that could come from flexible display. :)

Hopefully we will not have to wait until 2016 and beyond.
 
Comment

3282868

macrumors 603
Jan 8, 2009
5,281
0
Nice. Now produce a paper thin, OLED "newspaper" that changes with headlines and can be rolled up, and I'm sold.
 
Comment

osx11

macrumors 6502a
Jan 16, 2011
825
0
Nice. Now produce a paper thin, OLED "newspaper" that changes with headlines and can be rolled up, and I'm sold.

And then you have a really awkwardly-shaped role that's fragile and difficult to carry around?
 
Comment

JaySoul

macrumors 68030
Jan 30, 2008
2,627
2,860
Ooooh this is actually intriguing!

A flexible display mixing iOS and FuelBand-like technology sounds dope.
 
Comment

downpour

macrumors 6502
Oct 20, 2009
413
87
I'm probably not going to buy one of these, but I'm looking forward to seeing a new Apple product that looks futuristic and groundbreaking again.
 
Comment

thekeyring

macrumors 68040
Jan 5, 2012
3,457
2,092
London
If Apple went as far as they could with a minimal design, the iWatch could be as simple as a band you wear around your wrist that is all screen.

Instead of pages of apps, you have several icons/widgets and a 'live' clock face that you can scroll through. Just an idea, but it'll be interesting to see what they release.
 
Comment

ArtOfWarfare

macrumors G3
Nov 26, 2007
9,287
5,420
Wireless charging may make sense... The Gear's charging system looks awkward. (Plug this tiny cable into this postage stamp sized device.)

One thing about this though... I can't see women wearing watches. The few watches that I've seen girls wear look nothing like the ones that guys wear or smart watches look like. It's be interesting to see if Apple manages a single design that both genders would wear. Plus, I remember as a child not liking watches because they never fit my wrist well. On the rare occasion I had a watch as a kid I wore it on my belt loop - watches didn't fit my wrists well until I was ~14.

It seems to me that smart watches, no matter how cool, could only be sold to ~1/3 of the human population, based on the fact that only adult male wrists are large enough for them on average.
 
Comment

batchtaster

macrumors 65816
Mar 3, 2008
1,031
217
Nice. Now produce a paper thin, OLED "newspaper" that changes with headlines and can be rolled up, and I'm sold.

Pffft…. if you're going to go that far, "just" put a little projector in the flexible watch that lets you read your holographic newspaper Minority Report-style. The initial cost and the repair/replacement cost for your 20-inch diagonal (minimum) flexible newspaper screen would be significant.
 
Comment

3282868

macrumors 603
Jan 8, 2009
5,281
0
Pffft…. if you're going to go that far, "just" put a little projector in the flexible watch that lets you read your holographic newspaper Minority Report-style. The initial cost and the repair/replacement cost for your 20-inch diagonal (minimum) flexible newspaper screen would be significant.

lol You caught me, "Minority Report" was exactly what I was thinking. :eek:
 
Comment

ArtOfWarfare

macrumors G3
Nov 26, 2007
9,287
5,420
You heard it here first (and second, and third...), it's going to be called the iWatch!

Ha, ha, ha. Sure.

Why wouldn't it be? iMac, iBook, iPod, iPhone, iPad, iTunes, iWork, iLife, iMovie, iBook, iCal, iTV (never mind the fact that the last two + the iBook were later renamed) - do you doubt that the first letter of the name will be 'i'? And Apple has rarely made up the main word of the product... Mac came from Macintosh and Cal from Calendar, so neither of those were really made up - just shortened. Pod is the only word they really made up (or at least seems unrelated to the product.) So "Watch" seems like a reasonable guess. "Time" or a unit of time (the "iSec"?) might also be reasonable, or possibly a reference to the fact it goes on your wrist. iWrist or iWear? iWatch seems most probable to me - everything else seems awkward.
 
Comment

Tankmaze

macrumors 68000
Mar 7, 2012
1,691
328
that looks very familiar to this

nike-plus-fuel-band-03.jpg


but flexible OLED definitely interesting, not sure the technology is ready though.
 
Comment

nazaar

macrumors 6502a
Oct 28, 2008
576
296
Sketchy reports.... I'll say! That sketch is horrible!! I'm glad my hand doesn't look like that.

:D
 
Comment

IJ Reilly

macrumors P6
Jul 16, 2002
17,889
1,479
Palookaville
Why wouldn't it be? iMac, iBook, iPod, iPhone, iPad, iTunes, iWork, iLife, iMovie, iBook, iCal, iTV (never mind the fact that the last two + the iBook were later renamed) - do you doubt that the first letter of the name will be 'i'? And Apple has rarely made up the main word of the product... Mac came from Macintosh and Cal from Calendar, so neither of those were really made up - just shortened. Pod is the only word they really made up (or at least seems unrelated to the product.) So "Watch" seems like a reasonable guess. "Time" or a unit of time (the "iSec"?) might also be reasonable, or possibly a reference to the fact it goes on your wrist. iWrist or iWear? iWatch seems most probable to me - everything else seems awkward.

Hmm, I didn't say any of that. But what I will say is that MR can't seem to decide editorially whether the iWatch name is just a placeholder (in which case it should always be in quotes, which it is only sometimes), or the actual name for the product. They went through the same exercise with the iPad, which MR was certain was going to be called the "iSlate" despite the obvious problems with that name that so many pointed out. (This is true, you could look it up.)

Similarly, iWatch is unlikely to be the product's real name. First, it is closely associated with ancient, single-purpose technology. Strike one. Second, it associated with a growing class of "smart watches," most of which are geeky and not very compelling functionally. Strike two. Third, it limits the imaginations of potential buyers of the product and developers alike about what the product can do. Strike three, you're out.

But it must be called the iWatch, because MR says so. And they are always right on the money.
 
Comment

SmileyBlast!

macrumors 6502a
Mar 1, 2011
654
43
I'm probably not going to buy one of these, but I'm looking forward to seeing a new Apple product that looks futuristic and groundbreaking again.

It would be fun and nice to see Apple get the iWatch right even as Samsung failed with the Galaxy Gear.

Still if you already have an iPhone and you think that screen is too small, I don't really see how the iWatch will appeal.

I'm gonna have to wait and see.
 
Comment

chumpy34

macrumors 6502
Jun 28, 2010
316
235
If Apple went as far as they could with a minimal design, the iWatch could be as simple as a band you wear around your wrist that is all screen.

Instead of pages of apps, you have several icons/widgets and a 'live' clock face that you can scroll through. Just an idea, but it'll be interesting to see what they release.

I think you may be on to something. We have all thought this would be a traditional watch with smart features but I know Tim is a big fan of Nike's bands and he's a health nut too, so maybe the iWatch will be a bit more like a band than a watch but still have some crossover functions. Either way, I am jazzed for it and something new...
 
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.