Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

GanChan

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jun 21, 2005
617
27
I've been having trouble finding the perfect sweet spot between HDTV screen size, price, and a 7-foot viewing distance. I found myself thinking "Gee, I sure would have more choices if I could just go with a TV smaller than 42 inches." And then I thought, "Well hey, why can't I?"

since i live alone and use the same chair for all my TV viewing, i'm wondering if maybe I could get away with a 36-inch or smaller HDTV, placed on a rolling stand that I could park at close range for viewing and then scoot back out of the way when not in use.

What do you think? As long as the image fills most of my range of vision, will I really know the difference one way or the other?
 
Last edited:
I don't think it matters as long as you can comfortably see the screen. I have a 32" and I can be in bed and not have issue.

If you want to be totally immersed in the set you will need to go as big as you can afford.

Keep in mind that the closer you get you will see motion blur and pixels. So you want to be as far back as possible.
 
The truth is as long as it's 1080p you're still seeing the same amount of pixels. A 32" from a foot away can be like a mini IMAX.

I'll be sitting only a few feet away from a 60"+ 4K TV though, that'll be the next immersive choice.
 
I've been having trouble finding the perfect sweet spot between HDTV screen size, price, and a 7-foot viewing distance. I found myself thinking "Gee, I sure would have more choices if I could just go with a TV smaller than 42 inches." And then I thought, "Well hey, why can't I?"

since i live alone and use the same chair for all my TV viewing, i'm wondering if maybe I could get away with a 36-inch or smaller HDTV, placed on a rolling stand that I could park at close range for viewing and then scoot back out of the way when not in use.

What do you think? As long as the image fills most of my range of vision, will I really know the difference one way or the other?

The first time I bought a large screen tv (60") I was told the ideal min viewing distance was 12'. We only had 10' and my eyes were bothered at first until I acclimated. I'd say go with a smaller TV, 46" or 55" seems like those would be a workable size.
 
I bought a Samsung 32" 1080p led tv from best buy for my bedroom to replace my 9 yr old Samsung tube tv. Works great at the 8' or so range I view it at from bed. And for $249 I can't really complain. Works great with my Apple TV after I got the color settings down
 
I've been having trouble finding the perfect sweet spot between HDTV screen size, price, and a 7-foot viewing distance. I found myself thinking "Gee, I sure would have more choices if I could just go with a TV smaller than 42 inches." And then I thought, "Well hey, why can't I?"

since i live alone and use the same chair for all my TV viewing, i'm wondering if maybe I could get away with a 36-inch or smaller HDTV, placed on a rolling stand that I could park at close range for viewing and then scoot back out of the way when not in use.

What do you think? As long as the image fills most of my range of vision, will I really know the difference one way or the other?

my brother (who is single, mind you) has a 32 inch flat screen. He has it in a walk in closet sized room with no windows. So, you open the door, and he has a one-person chair about four feet from the tv, and the rest of the room is just storage for him. Since it is in the middle of his house, there is no outside noise, nor light pollution. I suppose if you're okay with watching tv in a storage room, then why not? It makes him happy, and he says when the room is dark, you can't even see all the storage boxes behind the tv. I just think its kinda funny that he's a grown man, sitting in a closet, watching tv.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.