Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I feel like there's really nothing new in this article apart from the fact that The New York Times has been covering it. I suppose this is substantial because it adds to the credibility of the claim, but I am anticipating further news regarding developments involving parts and other solid evidence. Apple sure has been doing an impressive job at keeping this project under wraps.

Is it finally coming? I really hope so. I will buy it.
 
I'm guessing it will be $350 for a 16 GB model. Apple likes to keep its profit margins fat.
 
A cheaper ipad not a mini ipad

A 8gb model without a retina display or 3g, if its about hitting a lower price point. The ipad mini makes no sense to me since I can't carry either in my pocket.
 
Post Pc

The iPhone and iPad are the tentpoles of the PostvPc era. Between them hangs iOS.

So whether it's an iPad mini or an iPod Touch Maxi, it's another ramp into the Eco-system. Over time the device size will proliferate in both directions and your photo streams will exhibit everywhere and face timing will consume about 25% of all your calls.
 
Just be prepared for a very watered down iPad mini, featurewise. Basically, just a larger iPod touch. Personally, I don't have any use for such device.
 
At this point give me one good reason why apple shouldn't make a "mini" iPad?

They already do. It's called the iPod Touch.

----------

Somehow all these articles forget that apple can't release anything in the 6.5 - 8.5" range thanks to the millions they pushed into lawyers the past 2 years to piss of the galaxy tab and get it banned by proofing that it 'was like an ipad' visually cause samsung owns the 6.5 - 8.5" range of that design.

You may find that the above is NOT true. It all depends on the specifics of the patent on the design. If it specifies the 9.7 inch size of the iPad then that's the only size Apple can fight for using said patent. But something tells me that they didn't specify a size, just for that reason.
 
In October of 2011, Tim Cook said on an earnings call that he was "very confident about our ability to compete and extremely confident in our product pipeline."

In the history of CEO's only one has ever said in an earnings call that he's "iffy" about their ability to compete or in their product offerings. That guy was immediately taken out back and beaten by his largest shareholders.

I'm pretty sure the RIM CEO feels "confident in our product pipeline" and he's got squat coming.
 
if it doesn't have LTE, then i don't think I will be buying.

It'll be WiFi only. I would bet my beer on that. Like I said in the other thread, I think it'll be branded as an iPod Touch rather than an iPad Mini. Either way it'll replace the current iPod Touch, and then the iPod brand will be associated primarily with music again, rather than a gaming/media device.

Regardless of what it's called, I think the market they're going after are iPod Touch owners that want to upsize, but don't want to shell out the $$$ for an iPad, and still want something nearly as portable.

What else would they do, keep the existing 3.5" form factor, while the iPhone gets a 4" screen? Or will they make a 4" iPod?

Maybe it will be called an iPad Mini, but it'll replace the iPod touch. Otherwise, they'll be selling two completely different products at almost the same price point. That makes zero sense!
 

Course they paint it that Apple is telling this information but they have nothing to back that up. It's going to be a laugh when Dec 31 rolls around and this mini iPad hasn't seen the light of day because it's not real and Apple leaked nothing to anyone. It would make more sense what with Tim Cook's comments about doubling down on secrecy
 
Somehow all these articles forget that apple can't release anything in the 6.5 - 8.5" range thanks to the millions they pushed into lawyers the past 2 years to piss of the galaxy tab and get it banned by proofing that it 'was like an ipad' visually cause samsung owns the 6.5 - 8.5" range of that design.

should they release such a thing, then samsung basically has an autoban at hand unless the design differs significantly from past ipads and hell will freeze before apple is going to break with their own design.
in this case it wouldn't be significantly cheaper cause it would cost apple a 2-3 figure million USD amount due to their arrogance and anticompetitive competition fighting patterns in the past
Are you trying to say that Samsung can somehow ban Apple from making an iPad that looks like an... iPad???
Yup it also has a much higher dpi than the rumored ipad mini. Around 216, which in my opinion is the best compromise between battery life and display quality. The ipad 3's 260dpi require them to use a gigantic battery. And the ipad 2's 130 was far too low.
Assuming the same resolution as the iPad 2 in a 7.85" form factor, the pixel density of an iPad Mini should be similar to that of the Nexus.
At $200 I'm sold no questions. Most likely will be 16gb $300, and if so I need more information.
Yep, probably $299 for 16GB, with the same internals as the iPad 2. And they may continue to sell the iPad 2 for $399, just as they are selling the iPhone 4S, the iPhone 4 and the 3GS at price points to cover most of the market.
 
Wow. AAPL should have a blockbuster second-half 2012. I really hope the iPad mini debuts with Apple's rumored new content service.

I wonder if the iPod touch goes away?
 
That extra .85" is going to be a killer.
If Apple prices this close to the Nexus and Kindle Fire, you will be seeing a lot of people go "Hey, that looks equally as portable, but with a bigger display".

This is sure to give Apple an absolutely decimating lead in the tablet market.

Which, to be honest, will be awful for competition.
Then again, iOS is still going to be competing in the phone market, so it's unlikely to stifle innovation that much.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.