A big part of implementing IoT devices is to maintain internet connection for as low cost as possible, which is not free.
Or you can use HomeAssistant and not be cloud or vendor-dependent.
A big part of implementing IoT devices is to maintain internet connection for as low cost as possible, which is not free.
I’m astonished 😦Pfft! (spits milk)
Yeah, like "an extra week" is the problem. It says right on the box: NO FEES OR SUBSCRIPTIONS
View attachment 914593View attachment 914594
Wink is so very clearly on the precipice of shutting down and they're just trying to get as much of our cash on the way out.
Fortunately for me, when I thought I'd start building a Wink smart home and purchased a Wink Relay, I immediately got a bad feeling about the company when they kept blaming me and third parties for their bugs so I didn't buy anything else. HomeKit came along soon after and I built my smart home with that standard instead.
How does HomeKit work, please? Also, is it privacy focused being an Apple thing?You just have to make good decisions about which horse to hitch your wagon to. Every smart home accessory I have is HomeKit compatible. Because of the way HomeKit works, even if a device maker went out of business or decided to charge a fee for cloud services, the devices would still work perfectly fine through HomeKit, because it doesn’t utilize communication with the vendor, just Apple. I also tend to stick to well established companies like Schlage, Chamberlain, Ecobee, Philips, etc.
It sounds like...
![]()
Airmail Users Frustrated About Sudden Switch to Subscription-Based Pricing on iPhone and iPad [Updated]
Airmail users awoke today to find out that the popular email app has switched to a subscription-based pricing model on the iPhone and iPad. Airmail for iOS is now free to download on the App Store, but push notifications and multi-account support have become premium features priced at...forums.macrumors.com
Everyone hates subscription pricing.
I am looking at you, Microsuck Office...
I’m astonished 😦
It was literally on the box...
How can they hope to get away with this?
I think the person who replied to you meant they don’t check their email. I don’t check my email except once per week unless I am expecting something. I turned off not just notifications but Mail doesn’t even check my email unless I open the app.Not really, push email notifications are nearly instant. Besides, various DVR/NVR software can have their own apps with push notifications of motion or other events. The important thing is, once you have cameras of good enough resolution and if you take time to wire them up with reliable PoE, none of this wifi junk, you have a system that's upgradeable for years to come.
My thoughts exactly. They surely knew the bad will this would cause, and had to have been so financially desperate that the options were try and get people to pay a fee or just go ahead and lock the doors.I can understand if the company might be on the verge of insolvency. And if it does go down the servers it uses to run these cloud-based products also goes down, leaving customers with pretty bricked objects. They may be pulling out their last option here to survive and keep serving their customers. Sadly, if this IS the case, I think the bad-will the action generates will essentially doom Wink anyway. They should have come out with a better way to address this than issuing an ultimatum.
Wouldn't be surprised if the R&C had a clause that they could start charging at any time and of course nobody would ever know since they would have to,you know, read it.WTF is that even legal? That’s not what you signed up for when you bought their products or the terms & conditions you agreed with upon purchase. Those products just stop working if you don’t pay??? The EU would have a field day with this. They don’t like electronic trash
And what’s that going to do but make a few lawyers richer and force Wink out of business faster? Nobody in the buyer “class” will see anything. Blood from a stone and such.Class action lawsuit in 3, 2, 1...
Exactly. Go with a known standard like so you won’t have to worry about this. I bought one of those cheap Chinese cameras and they could do the same but it was $20. If they were to do something stupid like this I wouldn’t be sad about throwing it in the trashYou just have to make good decisions about which horse to hitch your wagon to. Every smart home accessory I have is HomeKit compatible. Because of the way HomeKit works, even if a device maker went out of business or decided to charge a fee for cloud services, the devices would still work perfectly fine through HomeKit, because it doesn’t utilize communication with the vendor, just Apple. I also tend to stick to well established companies like Schlage, Chamberlain, Ecobee, Philips, etc.
It would be if it were in the UK. The change would only be lawful if it applied only to sales from the date of the change.This should be illegal, and it’s not the end user‘s problem that the business isn’t profitable.
Isn't the EU great.In EU it's a law that if a product was sold it should work like that until the end of life. You can't remove features from it. I remember it was something similar when Apple tried to remove 3D Touch from phones.