No, I'm not being entitled. This particular request has been discussed by many people who share the same opinion on MacRumors. If you scroll up to the second post (I think) I made in this thread you will see a listing of multiple threads about the topic.
Ah, but there's the rub. As I explained earlier in this thread, those features are ex post facto. In other words, they were not being asked for BEFORE Apple released the watch. It's only AFTER Apple released the watch that those features were recognized as valuable and thus became desirable.
You can't prove something true beforehand by using evidence that only came afterwards.
See here's the disconnect. You claim that an LED notification light is trivial. Why? Probably because you wouldn't use that feature, it's not important to you, etc.
The health data that the Apple Watch provides is NOT trivial to you though. I assume your defense of it means you take it seriously. Well, I don't. I recognize that it has value to others, but it's trivial to me because I don't need or want it. So, our definition of trivial is entirely different.
And I can blame Apple for offering an expensive solution to an inexpensive problem. Because that's what they have always done. I'm just pointing that out. I'm in this discussion now because people seem to want to deny that this is what Apple does, not because it's anything I get angry about. So, whether the result is beneficial to others or not, the fact is that many people asked for a simple solution and Apple responded by providing a more expensive one.
Well, this feature isn't a deal-breaker for me and never has been.
Aren't notifications on the lock screen Apple's answer to an LED light?
I find a disconnect between the Apple Watch that is always on my person versus an LED light that is always on the phone.