Snow Leopard 10A435 reported to be GM

Discussion in 'macOS' started by carterx, Aug 21, 2009.

  1. carterx macrumors member

    carterx

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
  2. ayeying macrumors 601

    ayeying

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2007
    Location:
    Yay Area, CA
    #3
    Please explain?
     
  3. leomac08 macrumors 68020

    leomac08

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #4
    I thought your thread title meant Snow leopard 10A435 reported to be part of General Motors Inc...


    ?????????:confused:

    still confused
     
  4. avediswolf macrumors regular

    avediswolf

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Location:
    Ohio
    #5
    What!!!??? Apple bought General Motors? Why isn't this on the front page?????
     
  5. VladM macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
  6. syqwin macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2009
    Location:
    Adelaide
    #7
    fake fake fake

    well~well, I don't have any evidence, I can't proof anything

    just that feeling~it's fake

    look at the last number "1" in "Darwin 10.0.1", it's so PSed

    The right side Picture is my macbook Sys. Inf.

    look at the number "1" in "Macbook5,1"

    that's the real "1"
     

    Attached Files:

    • ?? 1.jpg
      ?? 1.jpg
      File size:
      29.1 KB
      Views:
      6,489
    • ?? 2.jpg
      ?? 2.jpg
      File size:
      12.3 KB
      Views:
      6,479
  7. wetrix macrumors 6502

    wetrix

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Location:
    Auckland, New Zealand
    #8
    Fake, when you install 10A432, it doesn't say build number, it says 10.6 - because it's the GM for public release.
     

    Attached Files:

  8. Whiteyez macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    #9
    How noob you are? Just click on the number 10.6 to change to build version.
     
  9. VTECaddict macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    #10
    lol I was just about to post that too. :D
     
  10. MacManiac76 macrumors 65816

    MacManiac76

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Location:
    White Mntns, Arizona
    #11
    I don't know if this is fake or not, don't really care. But if it is fake, what is the point?
     
  11. sammy2066 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2007
    #12
    Quoted for epic fail. :D
     
  12. IT-Pro macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Location:
    Netherlands
    #13
    As far as I know, not all screenshots are from the same source. The screenshots mat3224 provided are from a different source than some of the screenshots on 9to5Mac. My own source, who provided me with valueable information recently, promised me he will send me some proof later today.
     
  13. wetrix macrumors 6502

    wetrix

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Location:
    Auckland, New Zealand
    #14
    [​IMG]
     
  14. SomeSwede macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Location:
    Land of ice and snow.
    #15
    It will be hilarious if 10A435 is the GM and tens of thousands of pirates will tear their clothes in despair and anger because "Apple fooled them". :D
     
  15. Krafty macrumors 601

    Krafty

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2007
    Location:
    La La Land
    #16
    Some dude posted a rapidshare link full of fake photos of "10A435," those 2 were including. He probably just edited the strings in those cause someone else pointed out the rest of the fakes in one of the threads in the front page.
     
  16. IT-Pro macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Location:
    Netherlands
    #17
    It's not a fact they were fake. That's what people said based on some, in my humble opinion, weird inconsistencies. It's like people will always find something to make others believe things aren't legit.

    Why 10A435 hasn't shown up on ADC is probably because it's an internal build within Apple and according to my source at least one company Apple's partnering with has received the new build already, which has been designated Gold Master. He said it will be on ADC on Monday.
     
  17. Krafty macrumors 601

    Krafty

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2007
    Location:
    La La Land
    #18
    Seems like everyone and their grandma has some "source," is there a place to order these or was this a trend I missed?
     
  18. carterx thread starter macrumors member

    carterx

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    #19
    So could be fake. A user on another forum posted that to change the version in the "About This Mac" just change it here /System/Core Services/SystemVersion.plist

    Did this myself on my current Snow Leopard install.

    [​IMG]
     
  19. rpp3po macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2003
    Location:
    Germany
    #20
    It's supposed to have a new address book app. Look at the screenshot. The highlighted item is supposed to be green! SL's UI is partly inconsistent, but that's not believable, it's fake. The green does not match anything else anywhere in the user interface and colors at Apple usually all decent from a common family (even the background images are matched).
     
  20. Sky Blue Guest

    Sky Blue

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2005
    #21
    If these are the same pics posted yesterday with the Quicktime preferences... sooooo fake.
     
  21. Peace macrumors Core

    Peace

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Space--The ONLY Frontier
    #22
    The "highlight" color can easily be changed by going to appearance in system preferences. The color is not fake.
     

    Attached Files:

  22. IT-Pro macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Location:
    Netherlands
    #23
    Screenshots showing About this Mac and System Profiler are indeed identical. Screenshots of Address Book aren't, they're new and weren't in the rarfile matt3224 provided yesterday.
     
  23. rpp3po macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2003
    Location:
    Germany
    #24
    Facebook & Twitter integration into Address Book does not make much sense. The Facebook API only exposes name & birthday and WTF do you want with Twitter in Address Book? Facebook & Twitter references make perfect sense as data fields of address entries, but not as super categories like int the "screenshot". This is fake.
     
  24. ethen macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2005
    #25
    If that is a new build, then August release or even early september release seems to be impossible due to the time to send in for manufacturing. But again, all we know is info we read from rumors, only apple knows the truth :)
     

Share This Page