Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
CNET is reporting that an update that fixes the issue is being released by Apple this evening.

Some earlier posters say it is already here.

----------

Rosetta isn't something Apple develops. It's licensed tech. Developed by UofManchester and Transitive Corp. But IBM acquired Transitive several years ago. Does anyone know if IBM is still supports and licenses this tech at all?

That's a good point. What's interesting is that Lion came out a little more than 5 years after the first Intel-based Macs came out. Perhaps there was something in Apple's agreement with Transitive or even IBM's agreement with Apple that limited the length of time it was in effect. If Transitive were still an independent company, perhaps they would have still wanted the royalties, but IBM might rather not have emulation software "in the wild" that replicates a processor that they still sell (albeit mostly for embedded applications).
 
Nothing surprising really.

I know critics are not welcomes on this fanboy forum, but I've been using Mac since I'm 14 and clearly this is the beginning of the end. You can't tell that by the current numbers, because sure, Apple has now gone mainstream and make crazy money.

But that's exactly why smart, early adopters will soon ditch Apple: what Apple used to be good with, as the alternative outsider to Microsoft, was quality control, innovation, more easily accessible options etc...

Now Macs will have more and more bugs, and for those who know what Planned Obsolescence is, devices will less and less solid. Plus they don't innovate anymore, the iPhone 4S for is an iPhone 4 with a useless faster chip, a slightly better camera, and a voice gadget nobody uses after playing with it for the first month. As for OSX Lion, it's a failure, that's the less installed OSX upgrade of all time, lots of people stayed on Snow Leopard.

And finally, of course, Steve Jobs is gone, and official documents show that he has the iPhone 5 ready. I don't whose decision it was to finally just release a crappy iPhone 4 update one year after the first one, even if they were sure to sell crapload of them thanks to stupid sheep consumer who just discovered Apple (lots of stupid bvtches now have an Iphone or Macbook in my class, and they don't know what Cocoa or Spaces are...)...after the mainstream, there is always the demise.
 
CNET is reporting that an update that fixes the issue is being released by Apple this evening.

For me there is no alternative for 1. quicken 2007 2. Personal Organizer (Chronos) and not interested in hearing how I need to move on.

Lots of pontificating here, telling people when to let go and why; lots of paranoia about apple's motives, and here we are, the expected fix. Thanks for posting.
 
In 2005 Apple announced the PPC to Intel transition.

In 2006 this transition was final. No more new PPC Macs.

In 2006 the "Universal Binary" OS, Mac OS X 10.5 was introduced.
PPC and Intel supported.

In 2008 the Intel-only OS, Mac OS X 10.6 was introduced.
PPC dropped, Rosetta introduced to make it possible to still use PPC apps.

In 2010 the 64 bits Intel only, OS X 10.7 was introduced.
Time to eliminate PPC apps.

Now, it's 2012.
A security update for 10.6 seems to destroy Rosette support.

6 years after the PPC to Intel transition, Apple seems to eliminate PPC apps via Rosetta support on 10.6

Time to move on, or get a real PPC and run 10.5.

Umm....

Leopard intro'd in late 2007

Snow Leopard intro'd in 2010

Lion intro'd in 2011.

Not sure why your dates are wrong? These OS's were discussed a year before they came out, yes.

The first few rounds of Intel Macs shipped with 10.4 Tiger.

Having to upgrade to Word 2011 is a complete pain. Not doing it until I absolutely must.
 
A solution posted by Apple

There is a new version of the security update (version 1.1) which appears to resolve some of the problems.

Hope this helps

Steve
 
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

One more reason why Leopard is the best Mac OS ever :cool:

Plus, non-Rosetta users can't use Office 2004, which is way better than the new ones except for PowerPoint, which sucked back then.
 
I guess people weren't upgrading fast enough to their crappy Lion "upgrade" and so now they're trying to kill Snow Leopard's usefulness in order to get people to figure "why not". I think adding a Rosetta option (hey, I still like to play Diablo II sometimes) to Lion would be more effective than screwing the pooch in Snow Leopard, but then this is Apple we're talking about and they do stupid things...like that whole Final Cut Pro X thing, for example. :cool:
 
Downloading 1.1 right now. I actually saw it come up in Software Update last night, but I was too tired to bother installing it :p
 
As long as 10.6 can hold out until summer, I will then upgrade to Lion when it is stable and of use.

In our home we upgraded to Lion months ago. It's running on all of our four MacBook Pros - and we have experienced zero problems. All macs were upgraded with a clean OS X Lion install.

I really don't think you have a lot to fear. And Lion is packed with cool new stuff.
 
Apple's QC has completely gone to ****.

"it just works"

...except when it doesnt...

some recent bugs that come to mind:
- Snow Leopard Security Update kills PowerPC apps
- Mac OS 10.7.3 CUI error
- Apple TV 2 Homesharing

I could tell Apples QC was going down the toilet when I got 2 of the first gen Unibody MacBook Pro's with THUMB PRINTS BEHIND the glass screen... then we had the yellow screen problem..

But the software, man they have got come serious issues now! I mean you launch a world wide big update and it breaks computers?? You have an excuse when your MS, NOT when your Apple and all the machines are made by you!! IMO the iPhone is just as bad.

My computer ran nice and fast and smooth after I installed 8GB of Ram last weekend, since the update it's now slow again :confused::mad: like Safari glitches when scrolling up and down a page, didn't do that after my 8GB ram went in!

However at least they have updated the video drivers or something cause Starcraft 2 no longer has broken FPS.

Sorry for winging, it's just I expected better from Apple considering it controls every aspect of what it sells and updates...
 
Last edited:
Umm....

Leopard intro'd in late 2007

Snow Leopard intro'd in 2010

Lion intro'd in 2011.

Not sure why your dates are wrong?

Same reason yours are and here's why : No one bothers to look things up anymore before posting.

Mac OS X v10.5 "Leopard" was released on October 26, 2007. First discussed in June 2005 by Steve Jobs, indicating a late 2006 release that was missed.
Mac OS X v10.6 "Snow Leopard" was released on August 28, 2009. Publicly unveiled June 2009 (though betas were around before that)
Mac OS X v10.7 "Lion" was released on July 20, 2011. First public appearance October 2010.
 
Basically it takes 2 years for an Apple OS to become rock solid. For those of you with short memories, both Leopard and Snow Leopard were really buggy on release. My Mac became a brick when I upgraded on day one of Leopard, so I sat it out for Snow Leopard until 10.6.6 and things were ok. Now I just sit back and enjoy the circus for Lion, knowing that it'll be rock solid in 2 years time. Having said that, I was lulled into installing the 2012-001 update for Snow Leopard. Will always remember now to wait for a while to see if new releases have bugs. I knew that, but got lulled into complacency.
 
... Now I just sit back and enjoy the circus for Lion ...

If it wasn't for the iCloud issue and Mobile Me disappearing in the summer, this is by far the best stance if you have an older computer, but for those with new machines it is not so easy.

Unless there is the rumoured 10.6.9 with iCloud, Apple seem to be ditching quite a few customers with MobileMe which seems a strange strategy.
 
Good, thanks for passing this along. I just shared this with my Dad, who runs his legal practice on an iMac using Snow Leopard and AppleWorks 6 (A PowerPC Application). He literally has *thousands* of AppleWorks files on his iMac and relies on AppleWorks everyday for his daily work (he has been using it since his old iMac Bondi Blue, Classic Mac OS 8.6/OS 9). This is the sole reason he has not upgraded to Lion is due to the inability to run Rosetta or launch PowerPC applications. The inability to run AppleWorks would cripple his entire operation, since he basically relies on this for everything.

I've told him to ignore any security updates, or at least until Apple gets this ironed out. Thanks again for sharing this news.

Given its so important no doubt he has an incremental clone back up using Carbon Copy Cloner taken regularly or Time Machine done hourly so you saved him having to do a restore.

No one doesn't have regular back ups these days, given how simple it is, do they?
 
Basically it takes 2 years for an Apple OS to become rock solid. For those of you with short memories, both Leopard and Snow Leopard were really buggy on release. My Mac became a brick when I upgraded on day one of Leopard, so I sat it out for Snow Leopard until 10.6.6 and things were ok. Now I just sit back and enjoy the circus for Lion, knowing that it'll be rock solid in 2 years time. Having said that, I was lulled into installing the 2012-001 update for Snow Leopard. Will always remember now to wait for a while to see if new releases have bugs. I knew that, but got lulled into complacency.

Quite true. Leopard and Snow Leopard were the "worst OSes ever" upon initial release, and then upon the release of their respective successors became the "best, most stable operating systems" ever released by Apple. :D

In truth, given Apple's quick release cycles (8 major releases in 11 years), it's pretty good. Also consider that, apart from Windows 7 (which was really more like Vista SP3), Windows releases were often unstable at first, but became more stable with time.
 
LOL. This. That is exactly what's going on.

It's Rosetta. Probably not too high on the list of critical features.

This isn't even an OS issue. The issue is with users not upgrading their ancient software.

I expect that attitude from someone who uses his computer for nothing more than Facebook and Twitter. Businesses on the other hand don't upgrade at the drop of a hat; they require interoperability across a wide age range of hardware and OSs. And FYI, large corporations are still using mainframe systems and the associated OSs from the 70s.

----------

What PPC apps are people still running that can't be upgraded (serious question, not meant to be sarcastic)?

It seems to me that all main stream consumer apps have a Lion compatible version (e.g. Office). Also, if you're hardware-limited, can't install Lion, and absolutely must use a program (e.g. business apps) it's time to buy new hardware and migrate to newer software anyways. Maybe there are some scenarios I'm missing.

You've obviously never run a business with a $50,000 piece of custom software.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.