cmaier
Suspended
I dunno if jjahshik32 is technically correct but he IS generally correct.
If it's truly "green" it should cost less. Not more. If it costs more it's using more resources and energy (unless the price hike in question is a scam) and that's un-green. 🙂
No.
Because "different" doesn't mean "more." One can use the same AMOUNT of material A or material B. They can take the same amount of ENERGY to extract and process. However using one may cost more than using the other because one or the other may, for example, be a scarcer resource (either literally scarcer, or with fewer current suppliers, etc.) Demand may be greater than supply for one or the other, and thus it may cost more.
Further, one or the other may be better understood, and thus more engineering effort may be required to use one or the other. This engineering effort is temporary "waste," but is offset by long-term environmental savings. The price may reflect the short-term costs, and not be lowered until later.