Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As everyone has been saying: Joke of an "update". Can't believe I wasted over an hour following the keynote on engadget.

And one more question:

Why does the camera on the nano only shoot video?
 
On the bright side. I just saved a few hundred bucks on an expected upgrade from my 1st gen 8gb.

Heh, same here.

No it's not. The new 32/64 have upgraded processors.

I'm not convinced there are any significant changes to the hardware. We already knew that before the 3GS, the 2nd gen touch was the most powerful device. My guess is they just enabled the software to support OpenGL.
 
I am totally disappointed. Now my son is gonna cry because I am not giving him my 2gen ipod touch as I told him I would when I got a new one with a camera. Why? Because Apple could not find it in their heart to give me a solid upgrade.

Jobs should be ashamed of himself for hyping this up as it was. He just wants more money for old tech.

Bad job Jobs.:mad:

you really should mail a hard copy of that story to Apple. i actually lol'd irl reading then picturing it in my head. for added effect, upload video of your son senselessly weeping in the corner after the fact.

APPLE U EFFING MONSTERS!!

if you do decide to do video, plz use the new Nano :)
 
What's really interesting is the included FM radio on the nano--many predicted Apple would never do this. I feel like this has opened a door. . .
 
I think I am going to need counseling after this dark depression I am sinking into due to the lack of a camera and mic.

Oh well. At least I can play beatles rock band tonight. :eek:

Norah Jones (bleh):(
 
I'm not convinced there are any significant changes to the hardware. We already knew that before the 3GS, the 2nd gen touch was the most powerful device. My guess is they just enabled the software to support OpenGL.

I thought I'd read that the implementation of OpenGL employed on the iPhone 3GS depends on hardware acceleration that was incompatible with the hardware in the iPhone 3G -- that a different CPU and embedded GPU combination was required.

I also thought I'd read that the CPU in the 2G iPod touch is simply a different speed grade of the same CPU in the iPhone 3G, so both would be just as incapable of using the same implementation of hardware-accelerated OpenGL.

So, if the same level of OpenGL support is present on the new iPod touches as on the iPhone 3GS, I'm willing to accept, until proved otherwise, that the new iPod touches do, in fact, have a new CPU and embedded GPU.
 
According to Apple's spec sheet, it would appear that the 8GB model is the same one that's been out since last September, and the 32&64GB models are sporting a faster processor and more RAM capable of voice control, just like the 3GS.

I've got both spec sheets open in front of me (8GB vs 32/64GB), and I see no mention of any difference in processors. Could you tell me what to look for?
 
I thought I'd read that the implementation of OpenGL employed on the iPhone 3GS depends on hardware acceleration that was incompatible with the hardware in the iPhone 3G -- that a different CPU and embedded GPU combination was required.

I also thought I'd read that the CPU in the 2G iPod touch is simply a different speed grade of the same CPU in the iPhone 3G, so both would be just as incapable of using the same implementation of hardware-accelerated OpenGL.

So, if the same level of OpenGL support is present on the new iPod touches as on the iPhone 3GS, I'm willing to accept, until proved otherwise, that the new iPod touches do, in fact, have a new CPU and embedded GPU.

I was just guessing really. So it's the iPod touch 2.5g then :p
 
From the various feeds from the event, and having a quick glance at the Apple website, I have not seen any official reference to an iPod Touch "3G". IMO the rumors of production problems were true, and that we can expect to see the "real 3G" sometime in the near future. Perhaps in time for the holiday season.
 
I've got both spec sheets open in front of me (8GB vs 32/64GB), and I see no mention of any difference in processors. Could you tell me what to look for?

You're right, there's nothing about it in the spec sheet; CPU and RAM specifications have never been published in those documents for iPods.

The Apple Store does have a short side-by-side comparison of the three currently-available iPod touches. It lists three features for the 8GB iPod touch:
1,750 songs
10 hours of video
Earphones

It lists four features for both the 32GB and the 64GB iPod touch:
7,000/14,000 songs
40/80 hours of video
Faster performance
Earphones with Remote and Mic

The "Faster performance" feature is the suggestive feature here, with corroborating evidence in the media event that OpenGL support was being added to the two higher-end models.
 
IMO the rumors of production problems were true, and that we can expect to see the "real 3G" sometime in the near future. Perhaps in time for the holiday season.

"There's no place like home, there's no place like home."
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.