Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Software Raid 0 vs Hardware Raid 0

sfwalter

sfwalter

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Does anyone have an opinion of setting up raid 0 in software vs getting something like a g-tech raid? Is there better performance or better reliability with getting a g-tech like system with hardware raid 0 vs software raid 0?

Thanks, Scott.
 
sfwalter said:
Does anyone have an opinion of setting up raid 0 in software vs getting something like a g-tech raid? Is there better performance or better reliability with getting a g-tech like system with hardware raid 0 vs software raid 0?

Thanks, Scott.
Click to expand...

My limited experience of Software RAID vs Hardware RAID showed me to avoid the Software version. It was forever finding excuses for resynching the RAID, so would be out of action for an hour at a time on boot-up.

Since moving to Hardware RAID 6+ years ago, I have never had to resynch except for a known reason (drive change, volume expansion etc)
 
RAID isn't a backup, it's supposed to stay running with minimum downtime.

Lots of folks on these forums assume RAID is a backup and use it for primary storage. If you delete something on the RAID it's gone so that's not a backup.

Oh yea, software RAID is useless.
 
blueroom said:
But any drive fails and so much for the array. RAID is not a backup.
Click to expand...

Of course it is not backup... No RAID is "backup". And... of course, is subject to full data loss upon the failure of any drive.

My comment was in response to the mis-statement that RAID-0 was only good for size. I was correcting that to state that RAID 0 is primarily used for performance.

/Jim
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back