Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Important nuance being missed in some of the knee-jerk reactions: the aspects which won't be available without a subscription are solely "intelligent features" (highly likely to be Apple Intelligence -based tools) and "premium content" (makes me think of clip art packs…) – neither of which sound like basic/essential functionality, and sound very much like premium additions which make things easier or nicer.
Exactly right. And it's likely the two are tightly integrated and applied across the bundle. That may be at least part of the reason for the omission; the missing features/content are particularly relevant for cross-app interactions. It would make technical sense, at least... though I do also agree with others that Apple is leaning on services for revenue these days, and subscriptions are a tricky way of recategorizing software applications as a services. (Which actually makes me wonder if this is as much about accounting as anything else?)
 
  • Like
Reactions: orbital~debris
I won’t get new features anymore without subscription, is that right?
Apple has said that it is only the new "intelligent" features and some templates that you don't get without the subscription. Ostensibly, that means that there should still be other feature updates that will come for the non-subscription version.
 
I thought pages, keynote, and numbers were still going to be free? That's what was so nice about apple vs Microsoft. I hated having to pay for word. One more thing to bundle into my Apple one I guess. Apple needs that money bad I guess. Tough times.
We should start a GoFundMe for Apple.
 


If you are not interested in subscribing to the new Apple Creator Studio bundle introduced today, you will officially start to miss out on some new features.

fcp-pcp-iwork-creator-studio.jpg

Apple said some "exciting new intelligent features and premium content" in Pixelmator Pro, Keynote, Numbers, Pages, and Freeform will only be accessible with a Creator Studio subscription. In the U.S., a subscription costs $12.99 per month, or $129 per year, while college students can pay a lower $2.99 per month or $29 per year.

This means that if you bought Pixelmator Pro via one-time purchase, which will still be an option going forward, you will no longer have access to every new feature. However, Apple promises the app will continue to receive updates.

The one-time-purchase version of Final Cut Pro for Mac will also miss out on "premium content."

From the Final Cut Pro page on Apple's website:Apple told CineD that Final Cut Pro's new "intelligent" features Visual Search, Transcript Search, and Beat Detection will be included in both the Creator Studio and one-time-purchase versions of the Mac app, but it is not entirely clear to us if Final Cut Pro for Mac will receive every additional "intelligent" feature that follows in the future.

Overall, both versions of Final Cut Pro for Mac will continue to receive updates.

Fortunately, Apple's website says Logic Pro and MainStage will have all the same features whether they are subscription or one-time-purchase versions.

As for Keynote, Numbers, Pages, and Freeform, those apps will remain free, but some new intelligent features and content will likewise require a Creator Studio subscription. This means these apps are now effectively "freemium."

Here are a few of the first new features coming to Creator Studio subscribers:
  • Pixelmator Pro: A new Warp tool lets you twist and shape image layers.
  • Keynote, Pages, and Numbers: A new Content Hub provides access to high-quality photos and graphics, and there are new premium templates and themes.
In summary, existing users of Final Cut Pro and Pixelmator Pro never had to worry about paying extra to have every new feature or content pack, but that is no longer the case going forward. And while the Keynote, Numbers, Pages, and Freeform apps never cost money, some new features will now be locked behind a subscription. These changes will undoubtedly disappoint some Apple customers, while helping to boost the company's services revenue.

This article has been revised.

Article Link: Some Apple Apps Will No Longer Receive Every New Feature Without a Subscription
I’m sure this is a common comment: Too expensive, no thank-you!
 
Dear Apple, 👏you👏 are 👏a 👏hardware 👏company. Internal software and content are only to facilitate hardware sales. This reeks of some business wonk deciding all departments need to pay their own bills, rather than appreciating the synergy that makes the whole thing work.
 
This is an abomination.

Obe of the main attractions of the Mac platform and native apps is the no subscription fee model.

Apple is becoming more like Microsoft every day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peterdev
Final Cut Pro being $300 is a pain point for people who want to own it but aren't in the industry, but making it $12.99/mo so others can buy it makes it extremely more expensive in the long run.

If someone only wants FCP, Motion & Compressor, it'll take 31 months on the subscription price to equal the 1 time buy price. On the annual subscription price, its a hair over 3 years. But still, they will never own it, and therefore, they will be locked into the subscription model forever.
I had an after thought about this which was that people like me who've never ventured into using Apple's creator apps like Final Cut Pro etc are now going to find out why Apple has "Pro", "Max" & "Ultra" machines.
I myself went for a Pro Mac Mini just to cover all bases, get fast compilation and hopefully longer life time usage.

If making these power apps easy to try for just $12.99 by subscription results in more people getting into creating videos then it may also push more users from the base machines apple sells into the higher GPU tiers they also offer.
The Mac Mini being the obvious example.

As a software engineer I know what it takes to not just write apps but keeping them maintained, fixing bugs, adding new features and extending their life as OS platforms evolve or change.
A one time price just doesn't work. Subscription is the only way.

The problem is we've had decades of one time software sales which have set an expectation.
The subscription is a covenant between you and the software developer, as long as you are a patron they will look after the code and keep it fresh.

I do hope Apple releases a light version of the iWorks threesome.
I don't need anything sophisticated from Pages or Numbers other than very basic functionality and I suspect the majority are the same. I don't use Keynote.
I suspect Apple might do a light version depending on how this new subscription pans out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macinjosh9895
I had an after thought about this which was that people like me who've never ventured into using Apple's creator apps like Final Cut Pro etc are now going to find out why Apple has "Pro", "Max" & "Ultra" machines.
I myself went for a Pro Mac Mini just to cover all bases, get fast compilation and hopefully longer life time usage.

If making these power apps easy to try for just $12.99 by subscription results in more people getting into creating videos then it may also push more users from the base machines apple sells into the higher GPU tiers they also offer.
The Mac Mini being the obvious example.

As a software engineer I know what it takes to not just write apps but keeping them maintained, fixing bugs, adding new features and extending their life as OS platforms evolve or change.
A one time price just doesn't work. Subscription is the only way.

The problem is we've had decades of one time software sales which have set an expectation.
The subscription is a covenant between you and the software developer, as long as you are a patron they will look after the code and keep it fresh.

I do hope Apple releases a light version of the iWorks threesome.
I don't need anything sophisticated from Pages or Numbers other than very basic functionality and I suspect the majority are the same. I don't use Keynote.
I suspect Apple might do a light version depending on how this new subscription pans out.
There are already light versions of FCP and LPX. They're called iMovie and GarageBand. The gateway drug is always some feature that is ONLY in the Pro apps. For LPX, it's primarily the ability to record automation in realtime either while tracking or mixing. In GarageBand you have to draw it in manually after the fact. While I get the need for maintenance and the effort it requires (having worked in software development for years), the arrangement you describe is unfortunately arbitrary and not worth the virtual paper the subscription terms are written on. It's not a binding contract that states the developer is going to maintain the software for X number of releases or years, or maintain compatibility with Y & Z systems. ALL of the control goes to the developer. Losing access once a subscription ends or compatibility is no longer offered is a significant barrier to this being a viable model for most consumers to support. For corporate purchases it's an entirely different set of rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macinjosh9895
There are already light versions of FCP and LPX. They're called iMovie and GarageBand. The gateway drug is always some feature that is ONLY in the Pro apps. For LPX, it's primarily the ability to record automation in realtime either while tracking or mixing. In GarageBand you have to draw it in manually after the fact. While I get the need for maintenance and the effort it requires (having worked in software development for years), the arrangement you describe is unfortunately arbitrary and not worth the virtual paper the subscription terms are written on. It's not a binding contract that states the developer is going to maintain the software for X number of releases or years, or maintain compatibility with Y & Z systems. ALL of the control goes to the developer. Losing access once a subscription ends or compatibility is no longer offered is a significant barrier to this being a viable model for most consumers to support. For corporate purchases it's an entirely different set of rules.
In my post I said "iWorks threesome", which doesn't include iMovie or Garageband which I also never mentioned.
You've quoted my post but I'm left wondering if you actually read it.
 
I kind of always thought paying the Apple Tax gave you access to their software as included in the price, but now...no point it that. And if you seriously think ANYONE will pay for Apple Unintelligent, you are delusional, Apple. Jeez. I love my Keynote presentations, but it's not a subscription. Sorry...I'll just switch to html or something...Good AI can literally make any of that for me. Much more economical to use one of those services than Apple's apps...and if I stop using Apple's apps....hmmmm......where could that lead....I wonder...;)
 
Yeah, no subscription garbage for me. They should keep the last free version available, or I’ll simply ignore its final version before it becomes paid.
 
How do you get to internet?

Do you own a phone?
Ok I’ll bite. if you want to get granular I do have internet at home (as everybody else in the civilised world, yes I own a phone (not sure the relevance). Anyone with a phone could use WiFi hotspots instead of having a contract btw.
I meant I don’t have any subscriptions with apple adobe Strava etc etc (technology)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.