Who? An employee being fired or Apple trade secrets being leaked?They’ll get over it
The people who the headline references.Who? An employee being fired or Apple trade secrets being leaked?
Yeah I'm a lawyer and my wife works in government. Both of us can work from home.
If lawyers and government employees with security clearances can work from home then I'm pretty sure Apple techies can. Unless... there's a hidden message about trust, professionalism and (more broadly) their systems lacking various capabilities.
In the Windows world the solution here is VPN into the internal network and RDP to a VMware Windows machine. This question came up last week from data scientists at my company who were complaining about how to get around working over the VPN and trying to extract large amounts of data for analysis to their local machines.
I'm not familiar with MacOS in large corporate environments but I would assume Apple has some way of doing this for it's developers.
Ah. The group labeled “some”.The people who the headline references.
Maybe and maybe not. I know companies already letting employees work from home, and there are benefits and issues. There are broad swaths Of companies that absolutely rely on face to face contact where working from home is a reduced efficiency band-aid. But your point is maybe companies can rethink some of how their employees jobs are structured.
Yes. “They”, the “some”, will be okay.Ah. The group labeled “some”.
Welcome to 'working from home'. If it was that easy to do your job from home, some guy in India would be doing it.
Ok.Secrecy at Apple. 🤣 😂 Don't we pretty much know everything before it comes out now?
I'm aware of all of those things, and far more, including the fact that "screen sharing" isn't a protocol, but rather an Apple term for RFB (a pretty lousy protocol if we're being honest), known by most as VNC, with RDP being the Microsoft version (has security issues and is over-complex, but a far better performer, and far more features). Granting full unrestricted access to an internal computer from an external network is more risky than granting access to specific resources.No, that's not how using screen sharing over a VPN works. Nothing is touching the home computer - you're basically just using it as a remote control for the on-campus computer. The only port which has to be open between the two is the UDP/TCP port(s) required for the VPN. All the work and LAN access would be happening on the apple campus, on the on-campus computer, on the on-campus disks. Apple might need to customize the screen sharing protocol to restrict certain things, such as not allowing the default dragging of items between the remote and local computer, and not allowing remote disk mounting or usb forwarding; but that should be straightforward.
One would hope that Apple is already only granting "employees access to specific resources", even on campus. That's standard best security practice.
You can argue "well they could take photos of their screen", but that hazard exists on campus too.
I called my insurance company yesterday for quotes on two new vehicles I’m considering to purchase within the next month, and as I was talking to the representative, she mentioned that all of their client work was migrated to their home, where they don’t even have to travel to the office until further notice. I asked her is that the case for all the representatives and she said “Yes“, there’s actually no one specifically at their headquarters aside from some supervisors/communication technicians for network repairs.
It’s strange really, but this is the ‘norm’ moving forward, which will probably be like this for longer than most anticipate.
I work for one of the top 15 Fortune 500 companies.Yeah I'm a lawyer and my wife works in government. Both of us can work from home.
If lawyers and government employees with security clearances can work from home then I'm pretty sure Apple techies can. Unless... there's a hidden message about trust, professionalism and (more broadly) their systems lacking various capabilities.
Maybe and maybe not. I know companies already letting employees work from home, and there are benefits and issues. There are broad swaths Of companies that absolutely rely on face to face contact where working from home is a reduced efficiency band-aid. But your point is maybe companies can rethink some of how their employees jobs are structured.
Yeah, would really like a super bullet proof iOS and Mac OS this time around.From a software development side, this could be used as an opportunity to really make new versions of iOS and macOS much better. Would it be the end of the world even if Apple delayed new iPhones and iPads for a year? Sure, revenue would take a hit, but, the company is starving for cash.
I'm going to guess that certain procedures are not properly in place since we never experience something like this before. It's just the nature of many silicon Valley companies where sometimes people are working on different projects and the structure is fairly flat. The confusion is not out of the ordinary.I work for one of the top 15 Fortune 500 companies.
Projects and products that I have worked on shall not see daylight until 2 years into the future at the minimum. Yet, I can work from home. So, not sure how Apple is any different.
"...thousands of employees home amid the coronavirus crisis has been messy,..."
covid19 has been messy to everyone
get out of here covid19