the issues at Apple are not that uncommon for any company that has strict R&D policies.
Precisely.
the issues at Apple are not that uncommon for any company that has strict R&D policies.
Only Apple customers have limited internet resources?It might not be a bad thing for Apple to become aware of the limited internet resources experienced by some of their customers.
Well, they couldApple can't look over employee's shoulders when they work from home.
From a software development side, this could be used as an opportunity to really make new versions of iOS and macOS much better. Would it be the end of the world even if Apple delayed new iPhones and iPads for a year? Sure, revenue would take a hit, but, the company is starving for cash.
The recent “expose” of Apple (And Snowden) using contractors to listen to Siri recordings says all that needs to be said about worker trust.Working in media I can relate.
TPN is very restrictive for working from home and understandably so.
But I think this out break needs to create a culture shift in the attitudes for working remotely.
There has to be some relaxation and trust given to workers.
-AE
Apple can't look over employee's shoulders when they work from home.
Welcome to 'working from home'. If it was that easy to do your job from home, some guy in India would be doing it.
No, that's not how using screen sharing over a VPN works.
Punishing Apple will solve the issue?It might not be a bad thing for Apple to become aware of the limited internet resources experienced by some of their customers.
Especially in the IT industry, that statement is complete nonsense - and you know it. Most managers and employers don't want you to work from home simply because they are afraid of losing direct control over you. Full stop.
I'm a lawyer and agree with all of it, right up until the time I need to be in court, which is Tuesday :-(Yeah I'm a lawyer and my wife works in government. Both of us can work from home.
If lawyers and government employees with security clearances can work from home then I'm pretty sure Apple techies can. Unless... there's a hidden message about trust, professionalism and (more broadly) their systems lacking various capabilities.
Mmmeh... I doubt anybody would consider somebody in my position a 'grunt' and I bill clients in 6 minute blocks (with zero dips depending on where I'm working... the firm pockets a lot more of that than I do BTW - I pay for myself hundreds of times over). Fortunately I'm paid based on the work I do, not where I do it. I'm senior enough to be trusted to choose the most appropriate location for each day of work. Can't really say I agree that avoiding 2 hours of travel, being able to start earlier and being available to work for international clients at odd hours is a reduction in efficiency. TBH not having people chatting and gossiping around me increases efficiency without making me less available (e.g. if somebody calls, sends me a message or e-mails me I'll respond right away... if they schedule a coffee with me then it'll be on a day when I'm in the office).
What secrecy? Apple has never been more leaky since Tim Cook. Basically every new product or Announcement is well known weeks before...
Listening to Siri recordings makes sense if there is something that Siri didn't understand, and a human listener can understand it and enter it into their system, to improve future answers. Nobody knows _who_ was talking to Siri. On the other hand, you know when Siri is listening because you said "Hey Siri" (and Siri filters out voices from anyone who didn't say "Hey Siri" so nobody can listen to conversations). And I know of people who seriously believed there was a human listening and providing the answer.The recent “expose” of Apple (And Snowden) using contractors to listen to Siri recordings says all that needs to be said about worker trust.
"Weeks before" instead of "months before".What secrecy? Apple has never been more leaky since Tim Cook. Basically every new product or Announcement is well known weeks before...
I'm a lawyer and agree with all of it, right up until the time I need to be in court, which is Tuesday :-(
Same. What is baffling is our county courts are open but the next 2 counties over are closed for 2 weeks. It makes no sense at all with the risk herding people into a courthouse.
Luckily I havent had to be in court for 2-3 years now. I would not want to go now.
Absent emergency matters (domestic violence, true emergencies, etc) the court should be closed. There is no reason to be conducting routine hearings right now with everyone in a room and touching things (tabes, chairs, bathrooms, etc).
Even in criminal court bringing inmates to the courtroom risks bring it back to hundreds or thousands in the jail. I gues they can do those by video and let the lawyer call in, but still. Its just a ton of really unnecessary risk going on here.
Like why are the airports and public transit still open! Its mid-boggling. You have people mixing from all over in one place, and bringing it from state to state, that is recipe for disaster.
Maybe and maybe not. I know companies already letting employees work from home, and there are benefits and issues. There are broad swaths Of companies that absolutely rely on face to face contact where working from home is a reduced efficiency band-aid. But your point is maybe companies can rethink some of how their employees jobs are structured.This whole experience could lead to a lot of people and companies being inspired to produce better solutions for working from home.
If not from Apple, then maybe we’ll see some other companies come up with new ideas... or an individual will start a new company.