It’s a bit unfair to make that charge yet. This policy update could be that they want to incorporate AI features that require data for instance, not necessarily that they’re becoming a data brokerIf Sonos puts more value on being a data broker as opposed to a sound delivery system it’s time to stop buying Sonos
The only thing that was attractive about Sonos was their price point not the quality of the sound in the products they produce
Most of the ads I hear on Spotify are to sign up for Spotify.What I really want is to know, when I receive a targeted ad, is where they got their targeting information from. For example if I get a targeted ad from Spotify, I want Spotify to have to tell me "we got your preferences from SONOS, Facebook, YouTube, and our own app". Mainly because I want to know where I can poison my data for it. Until I get at least that information, I'm running adblockers forever.
There is no lawsuit.
Unless they lied about selling data, the customer has not been damaged.
Companies are allowed to change their TOS (for better or for worse) even after purchase.
It’s sh*tty, but it’s a byproduct of modern technology with EULAs.
Your only options are to continue using the product under the new data polices or switch to a new product.
Until the company that sells that new product you switched to does the same. Even Apple might consider it at some point, maybe not Tim, but possibly his successor might give the green light. Hardware is just a tool now to make more money with subscriptions and/or data harvesting. We don’t buy the product anymore, the product buys us. I was thinking of replacing my two Sonos One speakers which I bought in 2019 with the third generation HomePod which I expect to be released next year. As much as I like Sonos speakers, I’m not comfortable with this change so it’s more likely now that I will switch to Apple. I just want to wait until the third generation.There is no lawsuit.
Unless they lied about selling data, the customer has not been damaged.
Companies are allowed to change their TOS (for better or for worse) even after purchase.
It’s sh*tty, but it’s a byproduct of modern technology with EULAs.
Your only options are to continue using the product under the new data polices or switch to a new product.
So you just want things to be free with no ads?
There is a middle ground. Politics, sexual health etc don’t have to be part of targeted ads. But yes lots of people prefer targeted ads because they’re relevant. It is possible to have relevant targeted ads without having to give up every piece of info.It would be nice, but unrealistic. To respond to your obviously loaded question, I'd like UNtargeted ads. Tell me about Tide or Chevrolet or some political candidate in general terms, not endless ads for rain gutters across multiple sites because I searched for it once. Oh, wait, this guy (likely a guy) is a homeowner - let's put an ad here with an annoying dancing silhouette about how he could save money on roofing, or his power bill, what party he should vote for (does he live in a swing state? turn on the fire hose!). Targeted advertising is a new invention and it's not necessary for an ad-funded business but now companies scramble for every penny.
So instead I'll reply to your leading question with one of my own: Do YOU enjoy being hounded mercilessly by marketers over purchasing decisions you may have already made? Do you enjoy a "free" internet in trade for faceless corporations and their algorithms knowing various bits of data about you, from your likely credit score, zip code, health status, sexual preferences, etc? Or would you like to just ignore ads about Tide and Chevy?
BTW this is rhetorical. I'm not interested in a debate with you. I just want you to know that there are other options out there for funding the internet that you may not have considered.
I love this ideaNew crooks in town.
Here's what I would like Apple Intelligence to be able to do:
Scan Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for any changes and summarize them.
For example:
"Good morning, Tim. You first downloaded this app in 2023. Between then and now, there have been several changes to their Terms of Service. Here is a summary:
Have a nice day. Oh, and enjoy your coffee."
- The company no longer promises not to sell user data.
- The company will scan users' private content to train AI without user consent.
I post all of my life on social media. Pics, thoughts, whatever.
Popular audio company Sonos recently updated its U.S. privacy policy to make a small but notable change that seemingly puts customer data at risk. As noted by Louis Rossmann (via The Verge), the new Sonos privacy policy removes a line about not selling customer data.
![]()
In the 2023 version of its privacy policy, Sonos had this sentence: "We do not and will not sell your personal data to third parties." The statement has been removed from the 2024 version of the privacy policy in the United States, though it is still present in privacy policies in other countries.
The change to the privacy policy has sparked commentary on Reddit from Sonos customers who have become increasingly unhappy with the company in recent months. Back in May, Sonos rolled out a new app design that has been widely criticized for missing a long list of features like editing a song queue, managing playlists, shuffling a music library, and more.
Sonos users already unhappy with the app changes feel that the privacy policy update is another nail in the coffin for Sonos. From Reddit user RemarkableAgent1350:
The removal of that line from the privacy policy doesn't mean Sonos is definitely selling customer data, and the company has not responded queries about what the change means as of yet.
Article Link: Sonos' Privacy Policy Change Suggests It Might Sell Your Data
I post all of my life on social media. Pics, thoughts, whatever.
But hell no, is Sonos telling somebody else what type of music 18.3% of their user base is using?
That’s outrageous, let me go on social media and explain how this threats my privacy.
You should be able to upload each ToS to ChatGPT and ask it to summarize and tell you the differences.New crooks in town.
Here's what I would like Apple Intelligence to be able to do:
Scan Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for any changes and summarize them.
For example:
"Good morning, Tim. You first downloaded this app in 2023. Between then and now, there have been several changes to their Terms of Service. Here is a summary:
Have a nice day. Oh, and enjoy your coffee."
- The company no longer promises not to sell user data.
- The company will scan users' private content to train AI without user consent.
I suppose the defence of that would be "legacy data won't be sold so if you cancel your account when the new ToS take effect, your data won't be affected and the original promise won't be broken." Of course, I'm assuming that legacy data won't be sold, but I can see that being the wiggle room.What's interesting about the old promise – "We do not and will not sell your personal data to third parties" – is that it promised something into the future, forever. Most policies say 'we don't do this, we don't do that'; I've seen few that say "We won't do that in the future." But that's the promise Spotify made: that, going forward, they would never sell users' personal data. I'm not sure taking the language out of the terms now changes the fact that they promised millions of customers that they would never do that. Maybe the language shouldn't have been in there in the first place, but it was.
A week or so ago, I had to click through a new agreement to use Spotify. Even after I had opted out, there were still a bit over a thousand vendors that had ”legitimate interest” in tracking me that I could not opt out from.What I really want is to know, when I receive a targeted ad, is where they got their targeting information from. For example if I get a targeted ad from Spotify, I want Spotify to have to tell me "we got your preferences from SONOS, Facebook, YouTube, and our own app". Mainly because I want to know where I can poison my data for it. Until I get at least that information, I'm running adblockers forever.
I bought a Marantz receiver last year. It connects to WiFi and bluetooth but doesn't have its own app (though it is compatible with HEOS), and I stream my Apple Music to it. Phenomenal sound, and none of this privacy nonsense to worry about.Why I switched to AirPlay2 via Apple app‘s on the Sonos speakers. The Sonos app used only for setup and software updates. Sonos app knows way too much about ones listening preference. If Apple does not have a speaker I need, will look only at AirPlay2 compatible speakers. Less apps in the mix the better. Getting to the point, if Apple does not have an app, my first question to myself. Do I really need to do that and most importantly what apo developers are first and foremost about privacy. Not what are the app features.
In practice, probably useless. Presumably, the developer would be able to do this scan themselves and tweak the new TOS until it no longer finds the difference they want to hide.Here's what I would like Apple Intelligence to be able to do:
Scan Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for any changes and summarize them.