Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So all competitors are copying Apple's every move again. How typical.

If Apple charges, they charge too
If Apple doesn't charge, they dont dare charge

ffs they should spend that effort coming up with new features instead of being so sensitive to Apple's every move.
sorry to burst your bubble but Spotify announced months ago that Hi Fi was coming this year.






how long have we known about Apple lossless? according to this very website the earliest report was 17 days ago:


so they aren't copying Apple's every move. In fact in this case Apple is the one who should be doing the copying. Apple Music is inferior to Spotify (i'm using Apple Music on my iPhone so not just hating).

Did they fix their crappy apps? Then no deal.
you mean the apps that are on ios, android, mac os, windows, linux, playstation, xbox, and even some TVs (LG for example)?????

meanwhile, i'm waiting for Apple to put out a dedicated Apple Music app for Windows so i can stop using the web player which is a buggy mess lol. "jUsT uSe ItUneS!!" ... no. it's old and archaic. it's so outdated and was designed for the iPod era.

i've used Spotify for 12 years (currently using Apple Music) and let me tell you the apps are fine and Apple has a lot of work to do before they can catch up with Spotify.
 
Last edited:
Having used both recently, I prefer spotify to apple music. It's the music discovery on spotify that gives it the edge for me. My experience is that I find new music more easily on spotify, whether it's the kind of playlists that get posted to online places I read or it's the dark voodoo of their algorithm finding things I didn't know but end up liking. Both spotify and apple music are way ahead of my brief runthrough of amazon music in this discovery department, but spotify wins vs apple for me here. But the thing I love best about this apple announcment is that it all but guarantees that spotify won't be able to charge me more for their eventual/impending hifi tier. Yeah, I'm trying to keep my audiophilia mostly in the closet, but I have the equipment to benefit from cd-quality streaming and look forward to it coming to spotify.

For me, it’s the UI and speed of the Spotify. I found the Apple Music app pretty slow on mobile, and EXTREMELY slow and buggy on the Mac. Also, simple things like queuing music are overly complicated in Apple Music, whereas in Spotify, you just slide right on the track. There’s also no comparable feature to Spotify Connect for Apple Music, who is supposed to be king of handoff and continuity. I also get free Hulu under the student plan or Spotify. Additionally, my friends use Spotify and if we send each other music, it’s always using Spotify links.

Lossless Apple Music does tempt me given that I have a low- to mid-end audiophile headphone setup at home Apple is providing multiple quality options, free of charge, and that they’re likely doing it properly by working with record labels to get the highest quality versions. However, I don’t know if I’ll be able to justify switching over when just simply using the Apple Music interface is slow, buggy, and not logical for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: isidore4000
With all these companies adding hi-fi, is the only way to listen to them in full quality through wired headphones and a DAC? Would services like spotify connect on an amp potentially support it? Is Apple's hi-fi capable of being played through hdmi to powered speakers on an apple tv? I'm so confused with all of the efforts made to ditch headphone cables when services like these seem to require them....
 
So all competitors are copying Apple's every move again. How typical.
Competitors??? You're kidding, right?

High resolution, lossless music streaming services have been out now for sometime -- including the music catalog behemoth Amazon. If anything, Apple is copying those and the few stragglers who still remain are catching up as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Expos of 1969
Let the war begin. Apple better up its game in general even before we look at lossless, hi fi and all this marketing munbo jumbo.
 
sorry to burst your bubble but Spotify announced months ago that Hi Fi was coming this year.






how long have we known about Apple lossless? according to this very website the earliest report was 17 days ago:


so they aren't copying Apple's every move. In fact in this case Apple is the one who should be doing the copying. Apple Music is inferior to Spotify (i'm using Apple Music on my iPhone so not just hating).


you mean the apps that are on ios, android, mac os, windows, linux, playstation, xbox, and even some TVs (LG for example)?????

meanwhile, i'm waiting for Apple to put out a dedicated Apple Music app for Windows so i can stop using the web player which is a buggy mess lol. "jUsT uSe ItUneS!!" ... no. it's old and archaic. it's so outdated and was designed for the iPod era.

i've used Spotify for 12 years (currently using Apple Music) and let me tell you the apps are fine and Apple has a lot of work to do before they can catch up with Spotify.
Okay, show me a great "Now Playing" option. You know the one Apple Music has? That Amazon Music has? That even Tidal has?
 
Having used both recently, I prefer spotify to apple music. It's the music discovery on spotify that gives it the edge for me. My experience is that I find new music more easily on spotify, whether it's the kind of playlists that get posted to online places I read or it's the dark voodoo of their algorithm finding things I didn't know but end up liking. Both spotify and apple music are way ahead of my brief runthrough of amazon music in this discovery department, but spotify wins vs apple for me here. But the thing I love best about this apple announcment is that it all but guarantees that spotify won't be able to charge me more for their eventual/impending hifi tier. Yeah, I'm trying to keep my audiophilia mostly in the closet, but I have the equipment to benefit from cd-quality streaming and look forward to it coming to spotify.
Spotify: great recommendations, great UI, some bugs on iOS, some bugs on Windows 10, works great on web, buggy "up next", OK audio quality, could be better;

Apple Music: weak recommendations, great UI on iOS and Web, awful UI on Windows 10 (iTunes), a few bugs in iOS, awful slow experience on Web, really buggy experience on iTunes, lots of memory leaks etc., great "up next", great audio quality.

I'm subscribed to Apple Music because even though Apple Music is awful on Web and Windows 10, the experience and audio quality is superior on iOS. This could change if Apple updates iTunes so I can stream on my Windows 10 laptop. I currently have local files on it with iTunes not logged in. Once you log in the bugs start.

The music recommendations are so weak that I have to look for new artists to listen on Reddit. Spotify wins here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: isidore4000
For anyone curious, you will still benefit from HiFi on low/medium budget speakers and headphones. It's true that the better the speaker, the more you will notice, but it's a nice upgrade for anybody regardless of what equipment you're using, except maybe super-low-budget speakers found on smartphones, laptops and and TVs.

Very much looking forward to Spotify HiFi. Now if only they could get their Credits right like Tidal, I'd be able to use it for everything.
 
still waiting for Spotify HiFi to launch like

tumblr_oncly6T9gs1tkb2p0o1_500.gifv
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dwalls90
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.