Not sure - the image at the top of the story shows Discover Weekly and Release Radar, so possibly not personally curated playlists just yet.It’s about time, but not quite what I was expecting, especially after 3 YEARS. It still doesn’t look like this lets you browse through your playlists... I could be wrong though
Exactly what IS Apple's objection to opening up cellular streaming to developers?
Exactly what IS Apple's objection to opening up cellular streaming to developers?
I can easily imagine a scenario where Apple worked with the major carriers - particularly in the US - as part of the effort to get the limited price coverage. That would likely have included some agreement that the majority of traffic would be over the primary device (phone) with the watch as a secondary. Carriers would want to know that adding n Watch would not substantively increase overall traffic. Allowing all 3rd party apps to use the cellular connection could create a scenario where both the watch and the phone were using significant traffic. Might be totally wrong, but this makes sense to me.
They are more widely available in store than online. Even for online orders, my experience has always been that Apple beats their own estimated delivery dates by about 1 week. Under-promise, over-deliver.Good luck with that. The lead time for the Apple Watch 4 is about 2 weeks.
If this app cannot play an offline music what good it's gonna do to majority of Apple Watch users. Obviously, Apple puts limitations on the competition for their advantage.
Can I listen to music - Bluetooth headphones - without my iPhone? It would be great to leave my phone at home and still have music.
Even longer for the stainless steelGood luc
Good luck with that. The lead time for the Apple Watch 4 is about 2 weeks.
Needs cellular and offline mode to be worth anything.
Once this allows offline playback, then it will be a worthy addition to Apple Watch.
Next, Apple needs to stop being ridiculous and allow third party apps to use cellular streaming.
Anyone else still find it incredibly annoying you can’t use the Apple Watch(celluar) music app directly to play music to your cars bluetooth? It only works using Siri on the watch. Then it will tell your iPhone to play, which in is connected to your car. Why on Earth when manually using the app it won’t and requests you to connect a device!?
Will Spotify app have this same glitch?
Anyone else still find it incredibly annoying you can’t use the Apple Watch(celluar) music app directly to play music to your cars bluetooth? It only works using Siri on the watch. Then it will tell your iPhone to play, which in is connected to your car. Why on Earth when manually using the app it won’t and requests you to connect a device!?
Will Spotify app have this same glitch?
I can easily imagine a scenario where Apple worked with the major carriers - particularly in the US - as part of the effort to get the limited price coverage. That would likely have included some agreement that the majority of traffic would be over the primary device (phone) with the watch as a secondary. Carriers would want to know that adding n Watch would not substantively increase overall traffic. Allowing all 3rd party apps to use the cellular connection could create a scenario where both the watch and the phone were using significant traffic. Might be totally wrong, but this makes sense to me.
3rd party apps are traditionally horrid at managing usage. When a 3rd party app like Spotify drains your Apple Watch battery and kills your data plan, who gets blamed? Hint: it's not Spotify. Nope, instead people blame Apple and their watch for not having good battery life.
Much of the API access has been rolled out as Apple has found ways to limit the ability of app developers to do real damage. They simply don't think of performance impacts and how their app is just one of many a user utilizes. Instead they only think of their own, making no effort to be good about minimizing resource usage.
Needs cellular and offline mode to be worth anything.
I doubt it. The cellular plan for wearables is the same price for apple watch as it is for all other wearables as far as I am aware. I am willing to bet anything this was a decision made to protect the battery life. A poorly written third party app that is streaming over LTE could very quickly ruin the battery life of a device that most users expect to last a day without problems.
I doubt it. The cellular plan for wearables is the same price for apple watch as it is for all other wearables as far as I am aware. I am willing to bet anything this was a decision made to protect the battery life. A poorly written third party app that is streaming over LTE could very quickly ruin the battery life of a device that most users expect to last a day without problems.
Exactly what IS Apple's objection to opening up cellular streaming to developers?
Either way if the feature still not available to a third party app until now then Apple had a headstart which creates an unfair advantage over the competition. Just imagine if I have Spotify then bought a non-cellular iWatch and I do outdoor running and want to listen to the music then I only have one option. Since I wanted the feature so bad, that will force me to jump into Apple Music. After months of use I already started liking Apple Music and created more running playlist.That feature is not ready yet and they said it will roll out in a future update. If Apple was putting a limitation on the competition they would have never updated WatchKit in WatchOS 5 to allow this app to exist. It exists because of the new Background Audio API they created for Watch OS 5 to allow developers like Spotify to make their app.