Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Seems like splitting hairs. It may not do 24-bit/48kHz … but it’s a fact that Bluetooth can now do lossless, and a few headphones and phones already do it.
And it’s called aptX loseless. Available only on Android. Apple is far behind (as usual) even though they could implement similar solution in their products easily (they control all hw/sw enivironment) long ago.
 
It is indeed a fact that Aptx Lossless can deliver bit-perfect 16-bit/44.1kHz but only in lab conditions. In real world scenarios where there is other RF about, such as from other Bluetooth users, WiFi, and Bluetooth peripherals, Aptx lossless has time and again been shown to revert to a reduced bit rate to prevent dropouts.

We’re close. But we are not there yet. And that’s just CD quality, which most people consider “standard” quality. Hi-res? No chance.

It’s not splitting hairs at all. I’m sure Bluetooth could manage 8-bit/44.1 kHz lossless but it would sound like crap. Lossless is only part of the requirement. It needs to be lossless at a good bit rate, at least 16-bit/44.1kHz, and it needs to be maintainable and consistent in the real world.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.