Spotify rocks - I love how good they are at making those daily playlists!
I think the differentiating factor is that Apple makes their hardware while Microsoft does not. Windows is technically a third party OS on non proprietary hardware. I feel if Apple was in the same legal water the lawsuit would of happened by now.Imagine if Spotify was allowed to provide a direct link in the iOS app to pay for a Spotify subscription, Apple might really be feeling the competition...I just do not understand how Microsoft can violate anti-trust for packaging internet explorer as the default (even though other browsers could be downloaded) when the Mac technically existed as an alternative, but some people think Apple is not violating anti-trust by packaging the iOS App Store as the default (even though you cannot download other app stores) when Android exists as an alternative
Facts.Yeah just like Apple isn’t interested in raising iPhone and Mac prices, they just want to sell enough devices to be relevant in the computer and phone market /s
Only a person with no understanding of how a public business runs would make your claim.
Imagine if Spotify was allowed to provide a direct link in the iOS app to pay for a Spotify subscription, Apple might really be feeling the competition...I just do not understand how Microsoft can violate anti-trust for packaging internet explorer as the default (even though other browsers could be downloaded) when the Mac technically existed as an alternative, but some people think Apple is not violating anti-trust by packaging the iOS App Store as the default (even though you cannot download other app stores) when Android exists as an alternative
Both Apple Music and Spotify pay artists the same amount. Streaming rights cost is, oddly, set by law and all companies must pay the same amount.I use Apple Music for the integration and they pay the artists more that Spotify.
Both Apple Music and Spotify pay artists the same amount. Streaming rights cost is, oddly, set by law and all companies must pay the same amount.
Pandora’s “Music Genome” playlist creation algorithm is still unmatched in putting together excellent playlists. I wish they’d license it to AM and Spotify...I find Spotify repeats songs way too often when I used it. I switched to Pandora and greatly prefer it...
Not surprised. Spotify has an uncanny ability to push music that you might actually want to listen to more often than not. Other services, like Apple Music you either get stuck listening to popular music or end up hunting fruitlessly for new music.
Exactly this.
I subscribe to both.
Spotify is my fantastic music discovery tool.
Apple Music is my fantastic music library tool.
The former helps me find all the new music I could imagine in a way only Apple Music could dream.
The latter lets me organise a beautiful music library including all my old CD's and singles and rarities that aren't on steaming platforms, all synced together with no difference to those that are, across all my devices.
Define "better"? Spotify now works with Siri. You just have to add "with Spotify" at the end of your requests. Works pretty well, actuallyStill waiting for HD Spotify and better Siri integration...
[automerge]1572272699[/automerge]
Pandora’s “Music Genome” playlist creation algorithm is still unmatched in putting together excellent playlists. I wish they’d license it to AM and Spotify...
Yeah just like Apple isn’t interested in raising iPhone and Mac prices, they just want to sell enough devices to be relevant in the computer and phone market /s
Only a person with no understanding of how a public business runs would make your claim.
Nothing wrong with competition as it will continue to push Apple. My only concern with Spotify is how long they will last, considering they don't make any money and are trying to renegotiate a deal currently to pay artists even less. Feels like it is just a matter of time.
Daniel Ek is an entitled whiner.Crazy to think they're suing apple for anti-competitive behaviour while growing twice as fast and turning a profit.
2. Spotify is not trying to renegotiate any streaming pay deals to pay artists less than Apple. That is false. Streaming royalties are set by law, and Apple, Spotify, Pandora, Amazon, etc. all pay the same rates no matter what.
What law in which country?
Yeah just like Apple isn’t interested in raising iPhone and Mac prices, they just want to sell enough devices to be relevant in the computer and phone market /s
Only a person with no understanding of how a public business runs would make your claim.
thats weird, i thought Apple music is present everywhere spotify is, given that it is supported on both android auto and apple carplay.
1. Spotify makes money now. It's in the article OP linked. It's the most important aspect of Spotify's earnings announcement.
View attachment 873013
However, Spotify anticipates returning to a loss for Q4 2019, estimating that its operating loss will fall somewhere between €31 million and €131 million ($34 million – $145 million).
Are you afraid someone might steal your playlists?as long as spotify refuses to implement 2FA I won't use their services
Incorrect. As long as they grow the number of subscribers (and fast) they are not necessarily expected to make a profit.If you’re going to pull a chart from an article you should also add context. Spotify said:
So, Spotify isn’t profitable. A rare quarter where they do post a profit doesn’t qualify. They need to make money every quarter, not because they got lucky with market conditions or did some “creative accounting” over a tax situation (like the last time they posted a profit). They need a business model that’s profitable. And they don’t have that now.
Which means they’re going to have to change. I see only three options - increase prices, reduce services or dump their ad supported tier (or a mix of all three).