Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm in the north metro of Atlanta and have been on Sprint/NexTEL since NexTEL which was the bomb at the time. I have never had any issues with Sprint even up in the remote N. Georgia mountains. I have an AT&T line as well and the coverage seems pretty similar.

I miss Nextel. Will never forgive Sprint for buying it and killing it off.
 
I have a couple of Sprint towers fairly close. If Sprint rolls out a modem with acceptable data caps ... depending on price ... I may be tempted to swap out my slow DSL.

https://newsroom.sprint.com/sprints...may-17-for-lg-v50-thinq-5g-and-htc-5g-hub.htm

HTC Hub $12.50/month after $12.50/month credit, applied within two bills. With approved credit, 24-month installment billing agreement, and new line of service. If you cancel early, remaining balance due. Tax due at sale. 5G coverage will be limited in select cities. See Sprint.com/coverage for actual coverage and availability. HTC 5G Hub SRP: $600. $60/100GB MBB Price Plan - With AutoPay. MHS reduced to 2G speeds after 100 GB/mo. Data deprioritization during congestion. Excludes taxes, fees and roaming. Number of devices may be limited by hardware. Restrictions apply.
What you’re looking for?
 
AT&T is playing marketing games. Don't believe the hype.

More relevant and important:
I'm no expert, but in talks with our enterprise network vendors, they confirm there are potentially serious limitations with mmWave. I was told it's probably best for outdoor use in small areas. Who knows. Anyway, this quote on the wikipedia page sounds right to me:

"Millimeter waves propagate solely by line-of-sight paths. They are not reflected by the ionosphere nor do they travel along the Earth as ground waves as lower frequency radio waves do.[1] At typical power densities they are blocked by building walls and suffer significant attenuation passing through foliage.[1][2][3]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremely_high_frequency

Before signing a big contract with Sprint using mmWave for 5G, I strongly encourage you to find a way to test it, especially within buildings, and especially concrete buildings.

I'd love to be wrong and welcome clarifications and corrections.

While all this is true, 5G is not going to be limited to mmWave.
 
@elvisimprsntr was cracking a joke about AT&T's fake 5G.

mmwave does have issues with walls and obstructions. I think that's why the networks will still lean on 4G to mitigate the issue. Besides the convenience of using existing infrastructure, I think that's one of the reasons for Sprint attaching the 5G transmitter/receivers to current 4G cell sites.

IMHO, 5G is about stationary wireless broadband to help offload existing 4G infrastructure to provide faster speeds without caps. If you think satellite rain fade is annoying, lets see how 5G mmwave service holds up in a tropical climate. I actually hope poured concrete walls and hurricane impact windows keep mmwaves out of my home, and I certainly don't want mmwaves in my front pocket anywhere near the family jewels.
 
Nah, 5G is the 8K of TV's. 4K is a worthwhile upgrade from 1080P. 8K is massive overkill that people won't even notice.
4K isn't worth a damn unless the content is in 4K, of which there is little unless you like watching nature YouTube videos and mostly subpar Netflix content.

All live sports are broadcasted in 1080i or lower AND compressed. Same with network TV. Same with cable TV. It's a joke.

Yes, there is 4K content, but you're probably watching a lot more 1080i if you have any kind of cable plan. If you don't, the content available just isn't plentiful/good enough.

And no, upscaling doesn't look any better.
 
Last edited:
and cancer increases in those cities first. Lets compare the numbers in few years.
We are about to microwave ourselves....
 
Is this line of sight for 5g? I had a tech try to install the verizon 5g in my home. The antenna was about two blocks away and I could clearly see it from my home. However it was pointing away from me and the signal couldn't penetrate my windows so they said they couldn't provide reliable service and left. Seems flaky at best.
 
Since consumer tech is the new arms race, health risks and other public safety concerns don’t matter anymore to regulators. Take a look at beta self driving Teslas going around using public roads and citizens as test tracks and dummies.

It’s all okay as long as it makes you the first and/or dominant player, putting you ahead of other countries’ companies.

Haha that’s true, Tesla selling cars as autonomous that aren’t actually autonomous.. and banned from being so too! Yeah don’t think much of Tesla to be honest.
Still 5G is now here, personally I couldn’t care less.. but some will go nuts for gigabit speeds, just to load those You Tube videos half a second faster?
 
  • Like
Reactions: aero2
We should not even discuss it from the technology standpoint. Instead we should fight to ban them in court.
I would argue that nobody *really* needs 5g speeds anyway, even if there weren't studies indicating that it skyrockets your chances to get cancer. Even if there is a possibility these studies are wrong, I don't understand how anybody can argue that taking this chance to become the first lab rats is a good thing.
 
The feels when certain networks still can't even manage to get you a decent 3G connection in one of the busiest cities in the world, but are now jumping to 5G.

Really Marketing, it works actually.
Coverage & Load matters more that 4G/5G.
[doublepost=1559244048][/doublepost]
Since consumer tech is the new arms race, health risks and other public safety concerns don’t matter anymore to regulators. Take a look at beta self driving Teslas going around using public roads and citizens as test tracks and dummies.

It’s all okay as long as it makes you the first and/or dominant player, putting you ahead of other countries’ companies.

Agree with your concerns.
Take a look at beta self driving Teslas going around using public roads and citizens as test tracks and dummies.
Is there data to show that rate of accidents are higher with Tesla Cars compared to other cars ?
I think anytime a Tesla is involved in an accident that will be big news, but if there is an accident with normal cars then that don't get reported, so numbers might be skewed. Have to look at the data.
[doublepost=1559244126][/doublepost]
According to ATT, I am already getting 5Ge. What took Sprint so long?

Sprint doesn't have "e"
 
According to ATT, I am already getting 5Ge. What took Sprint so long?

You're joking right? You know that 5Ge is NOT 5G.
[doublepost=1559244677][/doublepost]
The feels when certain networks still can't even manage to get you a decent 3G connection in one of the busiest cities in the world, but are now jumping to 5G.

3G networks are dead/dying and have been for years. This simply has to do with spectrum being repurposed from 3G to 4G LTE years ago to make a good 4G network. And it will happen again with 4G to 5G.

When phones are rarely connecting to a network tech. it gets dropped and spectrum gets repurposed.
 
5g?? I can't even talk and have data at the same time with Sprint. Lets not run before we can crawl.
 
I can't even talk and have data at the same time with Sprint. Lets not run before we can crawl.

Oh man... I remember when that was a thing a long time ago. All those "Talk and Surf at the same time" AT&T commercials while Verizon couldn't do it. Luckily times have changed.

But Sprint still can't do it today? :eek:
 
The feels when certain networks still can't even manage to get you a decent 3G connection in one of the busiest cities in the world, but are now jumping to 5G.

I've been a sprint customer for over 10 years. Their 4G network can't even get you 3G speeds. And I live in the Washington DC metro area. **** them with this 5G bs. They should work at getting a decent 4G first.
 
and cancer increases in those cities first. Lets compare the numbers in few years.
We are about to microwave ourselves....
Same frequencies as LTE on Sprint. Provide credible sources about "microwaving" people or quit with the fear mongering. The spectrum you're referring to has trouble penetrating fabric. Not sure how it's going to make it through our epidermis... lol. Sprint's 2.5 GHz spectrum (which has many times the range of mmW) was criticized in its early deployment for being unable to "penetrate a paper bag". Ridiculous.
[doublepost=1559246626][/doublepost]Early testing on Twitter is showing similar peak speeds to AT&T's 5Ge, but on an empty network...
 
Nope. I will not use Sprint after years of terrible service, unless forced to by a merger with T-mobile.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.