No smart developer is going to use this anyway. Adding an unnecessary dependency on the internet is a basic programming no-no. There is no justifiable scenario for this, even the ones Apple mentioned. Game levels? As you pointed out, that would make the game unplayable if you're out of range of cell service and happen to beat the loaded levels. Game tutorials? Not as important, but is certainly going to be detrimental to your less-experienced users to not have if they lack internet access.What a horrible idea. What if you're out of WiFi / cell range? What if the game or its resources are no longer available (dev goes out of business, doesn't pay their yearly subscription, etc)? What if the App Store is down, or Apple discontinues or changes this feature and the developer doesn't update their app: then you're just stuck?
I have a better idea: why don't Phil and Apple stop skimping on device space instead? Why should I have to be constantly downloading things (or parts of things) that I purchased instead of storing them locally if I want?
This is wonderful news!
What a great game Final Fantasy VII was on the original Playstation. Such cool music and a superb story.
Playing it on a 13" iPad would be a joy. This is the game we've all been waiting for.
My Playstation version came on four discs, not three.
Are you sure you aren't confusing VII for VIII? I have both original Playstation releases, FFVII came on 3 discs, FFVIII came on 4 discs (or maybe you had some special version?).
Regardless, this is of course very good news.
I'm probably mis-remembering it. Must get it out and see. I have VIII, so perhaps I'm thinking of that.
Thanks for your reply. I will definitely check out the FF VII remake as soon as it is available. As far as what is currently available on PS4, would you recommend Final Fantasy Type-0, or the X/X-2 HD Remaster? Being someone who hasn't played before, I'm not sure where to start.
Yet Apple slapped everybody in the face with a base 16gb model for one final year.
So why not make 8GB the base and drop the price by an additional $100?Never understood this logic - if the 16Gb isn't suitable for you then don't buy it. You haven't been 'slapped in the face'. The 16Gb model is for people who don't want loads of films, games or apps on their phone.
Correction, this will be the second PlayStation-originated game from Square Enix. Back in 2011, they released Final Fantasy Tactics: The War of the Lions for iPhone and later as a separate iPad release, though technically this is a port of the PSP port of the PS1 game.Square Enix has made the first six Final Fantasy games available on iOS devices, but Final Fantasy VII for iOS will mark the first Final Fantasy port coming from a PlayStation game.
I often wonder if Apple would get such a pass when/if they entered the home console space. Updating the console and breaking games seems like a huge problem. Especially since developers would have to divert resources from new "AAA" games to fix the old ones potentially years after the old one was released.I'm really gun-shy about buying anything from Square Enix for iOS, after The World Ends With You broke under iOS 8 and was left unfixed.
As a developer, I'm pleased that they charge sustainable prices for their games — none of this race-to-the-bottom free-to-play mindset that has ruined iOS gaming — but to charge $15-20 and then not keep the game working after a system update is inexcusable. And with FF7 taking 70+ hours to finish, some casual players will need years to finish it, which likely means going through at least one OS update.
The remake?Great news, but still holding out for FF VII on the Mac (natively).
This is called "Slicing" (one aspect of App Thinning), but iOS 9 also includes another aspect of App Thinning called "On-Demand Resources" which allows for loading assets from the app store on demand. So as the user progresses through the game, more assets are downloaded and unused assets are removed.
Yes same here. That one was my favorite between VII, VIII, and IX.I hope this means VIII is coming as well...
No smart developer is going to use this anyway. Adding an unnecessary dependency on the internet is a basic programming no-no. There is no justifiable scenario for this, even the ones Apple mentioned. Game levels? As you pointed out, that would make the game unplayable if you're out of range of cell service and happen to beat the loaded levels. Game tutorials? Not as important, but is certainly going to be detrimental to your less-experienced users to not have if they lack internet access.
I think it's safe to say that you can judge the quality of the developer by whether or not they use this. The good ones will most certainly not.
Yes same here. That one was my favorite between VII, VIII, and IX.
I really would like to get into the FF series, but don't really know where to start. Is it the type of game where each release builds upon the previous one story wise?
No. Final Fantasy VII is an ideal place to start. It was leaps and bounds beyond what came before. There are references to earlier games, of course, but nothing that matters to the gameplay or story. Each of the Final Fantasy games is a self-contained story, anyway.
Final Fantasy VIII was good, though not nearly as good as VII. FF IX was excellent.
So why not make 8GB the base and drop the price by an additional $100?
There is no reason to upscale low resolution textures. That's what filtering is for, or scanlines. we've been playing this game on emulators for decades and IT LOOKED JUST FINE. there is no need for this game to be over 3gb. /facepalm