Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sandforce SSD's must port the Sandforce firmware to their specific devices (OWC, CRUCIAL, ETC) after every update.

Crucial does not use the Sandforce controller.

----------

thanks a lot for this explanation

Go through and read HellHammer's posts in this thread. The guy knows what he is talking about.

I took his advice and got the Crucial M4 256gb when NewEgg had it on sale for $279 last week. I installed it a few days ago with no hitches and it works great. For me, reliability far outweighs speed and the M4 looks to be one of the most reliable out there right now.
 
Actually, Fedex just dropped a Plextor M3 for me earlier today. Should have a review up in a week or so :cool:

I look forward to it. All I have managed to do in the last week is get the drive in and Lion installed, then swap it back out. I did that in an evening. My doubler bay hasn't arrived yet and I NEED the secondary drive for business stuff.

Hopefully this week I'll get to put it through its paces. It did install Lion faster than hell though. That was nice at least :)
 
OMG, my late 2011 15" MBP used to be really fast with the Intel 510 SSD (120 Gb)

now with the Samsung 830 (256 GB) instead, it's screaming :D

i love it even more and more :p
 
Last edited:
OMG, my late 2011 15" MBP used to be really fast with the Intel 510 SSD (120 Gb)

now with the Samsung 810 (256 GB) instead, it's screaming :D

i love it even more and more :p

Do you mean Samsung 830? Yeah that thing is so friggen fast and stable. I went round and round with Intel, Crucial, OWC, etc but I bought the Samsung. Everything they make is great!
 
oops sorry, yes 830

i was happy with the intel

nothing to complain about

0 issue at all, great compatibility, no beachball, no freeze


but i also get the same with the samsung and even better performance


just judging the product from the case: wow !

superb case for the samsung SSD, probably the best i've seen so far

no waste in extra packaging, very simple too

it could have been an Apple product considering the overall quality

nice job Samsung

the Sata to USB cable provided is very convenient to connect a 2.5" drive externally without using an enclosure
 
btw, how can i update the firmware of the samsung, using a mac only ?

does it work it i virtualize a Windows session ?
 
btw, how can i update the firmware of the samsung, using a mac only ?

does it work it i virtualize a Windows session ?

Can't do it in Mac. Has to be in Windows, however, the firmware that comes with it should be fine for now.

Virtualization may not be a good idea. A dual booted mac might work, but give it a shot in the Virtual Machine. Just backup your data first. Caution, if hose the drive, you might need a Windows machine to fix it.
 
Anyone uses Corsair Force 3?

I just recently got the Corsair Force 3 series GT 120gb.

It is really fast (as far as i have noticed), and i dont have any problems with it whatsoever.

My friend also has one in his MBP and is happy.
 
Which SSD for Late 2006 MBPRO?

I have a late 2006 MacBook Pro, 2.16 ghz, 15-inch, Core 2 Duo machine and the HD is fried.

Which SSD would be compatible and most reliable? I want something with 180GB or 256GB.

Thanks.
 
About to buy a Crucial M4 SSD from Alternate in the Netherlands. However they have 2 different types in stock, one of 9.5mm and another of 7mm in height.

The 'normal' 9.5mm:
http://www.alternate.nl/html/produc...sks&l2=Solid+State+Drives&l3=SATA&l4=2,5+inch

And the slim:
http://www.alternate.nl/html/produc...sks&l2=Solid+State+Drives&l3=SATA&l4=2,5+inch

Which of the two would you recommend for a 2011' MBP? Does the 2.5mm height make any difference whatsoever? When I look at the Crucial firmware updates, they do offer different firmware updates for both of them.
 
About to buy a Crucial M4 SSD from Alternate in the Netherlands. However they have 2 different types in stock, one of 9.5mm and another of 7mm in height.

The 'normal' 9.5mm:
http://www.alternate.nl/html/produc...sks&l2=Solid+State+Drives&l3=SATA&l4=2,5+inch

And the slim:
http://www.alternate.nl/html/produc...sks&l2=Solid+State+Drives&l3=SATA&l4=2,5+inch

Which of the two would you recommend for a 2011' MBP? Does the 2.5mm height make any difference whatsoever? When I look at the Crucial firmware updates, they do offer different firmware updates for both of them.

The 9.5mm is what apple is using for the HDD and it is what I put in from Crucial. The newest firmware revision for this is 309. You can update the firmware on a Mac only with Crucial via their website. I would go with the 9.5mm as I did.
 
The 9.5mm is what apple is using for the HDD and it is what I put in from Crucial. The newest firmware revision for this is 309. You can update the firmware on a Mac only with Crucial via their website. I would go with the 9.5mm as I did.

Thanks for the response :) Will make sure to check the firmware before installing anything. The last firmware updates seems to have been a nice fix performance wise.
 
I just recently got the Corsair Force 3 series GT 120gb.

It is really fast (as far as i have noticed), and i dont have any problems with it whatsoever.

My friend also has one in his MBP and is happy.

Nice, what speeds do you get?
 
Samsung 400 write 500 read :p

Keep in mind that especially write speed is up to the capacity. 256GB and 512GB versions of Samsung 830 achieve up to 400MB/s write, but the 64GB model is good for only 160MB/s.

About to buy a Crucial M4 SSD from Alternate in the Netherlands. However they have 2 different types in stock, one of 9.5mm and another of 7mm in height.

The 'normal' 9.5mm:
http://www.alternate.nl/html/produc...sks&l2=Solid+State+Drives&l3=SATA&l4=2,5+inch

And the slim:
http://www.alternate.nl/html/produc...sks&l2=Solid+State+Drives&l3=SATA&l4=2,5+inch

Which of the two would you recommend for a 2011' MBP? Does the 2.5mm height make any difference whatsoever? When I look at the Crucial firmware updates, they do offer different firmware updates for both of them.

The only difference is that the 9.5mm model has a bigger casing to fit better in some laptops, the actual drives are the same (different part numbers, hence two links in firmware sections, although the FWs are the same). Apple uses 9.5mm drives so that would be a safe bet.

I have a late 2006 MacBook Pro, 2.16 ghz, 15-inch, Core 2 Duo machine and the HD is fried.

Which SSD would be compatible and most reliable? I want something with 180GB or 256GB.

Thanks.

Intel 320 Series is a safe bet but not available in the capacities you would prefer. Crucial M4 or Samsung 830 Series are probably your best options as SATA 3Gb/s drives are harder to find and cost more due to older process node.
 
Hellhammer, i wanted to personally thank you for your previous advices

i got an Intel 510 SSD and finally sold it to get a Samsung 830

your feedback about the Samsung was very useful

i'm really happy and my MBP works like a charm


so, thank you
 
Hard drive upgrade (Disk or SSD)

Here is how the hard drive is mounted using the 4 post screws. It doesn't screw down to the case, rather it is suspended by 4 horizontal screws along a rail. The rail is exposed by removing a couple screws on the rail cap:

Screw locations:
D6MZa.png


Screw example:
NZlbt.jpg


Video explaining it:

Hard Drive Install MBP (Unibody)

Therefore, any thickness hard drive will fit (assuming it is using standard form factors).
 
ok then are they are reliable above this capacity or should we go for specific brands for 256 Gb SSD ?

I only have one 256 GB drive. I don't think the size determines reliability much where as the maker can very much so. The Samsung, Crucial, and Intels all have excellent ratings across the boards on all of their available sizes. I went 256 for the Crucial M4 because its write speed is significantly higher than on the 128. Also, the cost is really appealing. The 128 Intel (in reference to their performance models) and Samsung both are faster at the 120/8 size IIRC than the Crucial. My 120 GB 510 has about the same write speeds as my 256 M4.
 
Samsung 830 256 Gb on a late 2011 15" MBP i7 2.2 w/ 8 Gb Ram

415034DiskSpeedTest.png



after a few minutes, the read speed can reach 500 mb/s but write speed does not go beyond 401

which is already more than twice the results i got with my Intel 510 120 Gb :)
 
Samsung 830 256 Gb on a late 2011 15" MBP i7 2.2 w/ 8 Gb Ram

after a few minutes, the read speed can reach 500 mb/s but write speed does not go beyond 401

which is already more than twice the results i got with my Intel 510 120 Gb :)

Just remember, depending on what you are writing(video, music, file, etc) the speeds will be different. The firmware uses different algorithms for different media.

NOTE: Heavy usage, such as video editing, where huge swap files are being written to/deleted from the disk, will eventually cause a massive slow down since the available space on the disk will get full and the free space will be required to be 'freed' before it can be written to. The garbage collection in the firmware is designed to be ran ONLY when there is little SSD activity (idling) or when free space gets low. This requires 2 operations for each write, thus slowing it down.

However, the damn thing kicks a$$!
 
Samsung 830 256 Gb on a late 2011 15" MBP i7 2.2 w/ 8 Gb Ram

Image


after a few minutes, the read speed can reach 500 mb/s but write speed does not go beyond 401

which is already more than twice the results i got with my Intel 510 120 Gb :)

Nice speeds! The 830 looks like a really nice drive! Here is a shot of my Crucial M4 256 GB for comparison. It looks like the Crucial is a wee bit quicker on read but the Samsung is a lot bit quicker on write. For those who do large/heavy writes, the Samsung is likely a better choice (although I love my M4 :) )
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2012-03-07 at 8.35.10 PM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2012-03-07 at 8.35.10 PM.jpg
    245.2 KB · Views: 97
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.