Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That speed is about what would be expected with 2 x 128 GB chips (or maybe a bit more on the write), and yes there are always large variations with Disk Speed Test.
Blackmagic Speedtest is simply not good at doing what it does. You run a few passes and it doesn't average them out for you, only showing the latest run. And then some people stops at the wrong time as the needle is still moving. But Blackmagic is the most recognisable and the UI looks pretty, so people just use it.
 
so I rerun the test after few hours and getting much more decent numbers now

Screenshot 2024-11-08 at 20.00.34.png

Base M4 mac mini with 256GB
View attachment 2448428
 
I've seen 3000 Mb/s in one review not sure of size. Seems like 90% of reviewers have M4 Pro we will have to wait till tomorrow for the average users to really tell us.
I'm only seeing about 2500, both read and write, using blackmagik's test on my new M4, but I'll give it a try again in a bit, filevault may still be doing its thing, icloud still downloading, and spotlight may still be doing initial indexing

For the use I expect for this machine those speeds are fine, so not bothered, but it is interesting that it's substantially lower than it seems other folks are seeing. We'll see what it looks like in a bit.
 
So frustrating that the base models have been in hands of users for 18+ hours but few people are benchmarking the SSDs. I finally got mine and I'm posting my results for the base M4 256GB. The lower BlackMagic score is for the default 5GB test size, the higher score is for a 1 GB test size.DiskSpeedTest 1 GB.pngDiskSpeedTest.pngAPPLE SSD AP0256Z : Apple M4.png
 
I'm picking up a base M4 with 24 GB RAM and 512 GB storage right now. I'll post results when I get home.

It's going to be more than what I need, I'm sure, but if M4 Pro is twice as fast... I may end up returning this.
 
Based on the data posted here so far it looks like you need a M4 Pro chip with any storage to hit 6000/4000 while the regular M4 is 3000/3000 regardless of 256/512
This statement is not acurate. 256 is slower than 512. Some people are testing using 1GB file size instead of 5GB, and some kind of cache on the SSD makes results better than real performance.
256 are getting around 2GB/s and 512 are getting more than 3GB/s
 
Probably because the 512 uses 4 NAND chips? Need more results from M4 (Non Pro) / 512
 
I betcha a bunch of people are testing while the computer is still indexing and downloading from iCloud.

Probably because the 512 uses 4 NAND chips? Need more results from M4 (Non Pro) / 512
No, it’s 2 NAND chips. Even 2 TB would be 2 NAND chips on the M4 non-Pro.
 
From the Tom's Hardware article (M4 512 vs M4 Pro 512)

M4 512 is barely faster than the 256 data posted here. Almost 2x on M4 Pro with 512 though

1731134215843.png
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.