cluster needs
kansaigaijin,
I can tell you what I am currently buying for the Mac cluster that I am building. Space is not a big issue for me (I have a good size lab room and nothing but computers to put in there). So I don't need to pay extra for rack-mountable hardware. I just buy from the Apple online store, but I remove as many bells and whistles as I can. Currently I have two machines that have larger hard drives, one with a Superdrive for archiving data. The other machine in the cluster, and probably all future purchases, are as stripped down as I can get from Apple. Cheapest graphics card (these machines don't even have their own monitor, what do I need a good graphics card for?), no modem, smallest hard drive, etc. I don't think I could do without the hard drive entirely, since running physics simulation code on the cluster occasionally requires individual nodes to do a local write to a file. My main concern is for two things: gigabit ethernet and the processor. I'd love to see more cache on the processor and a faster system bus (currently my large scale jobs have to write to the hard drive, which eats up a ton of time).
Anyway, it would be nice for Apple to address the cluster/server crowd directly. It looks like, for the links given above, that the server crowd does have some good options. To be honest, I think the scaled-down versions of the PowerMac G4s at the Apple store are a pretty good buy for someone building a mac cluster. So no complaints here. Saving some extra $ with cheaper graphics cards or smaller hard drives would be nice, but not essential. The benefits of Apple hardware and OS X entirely outweigh those considerations.
kansaigaijin,
I can tell you what I am currently buying for the Mac cluster that I am building. Space is not a big issue for me (I have a good size lab room and nothing but computers to put in there). So I don't need to pay extra for rack-mountable hardware. I just buy from the Apple online store, but I remove as many bells and whistles as I can. Currently I have two machines that have larger hard drives, one with a Superdrive for archiving data. The other machine in the cluster, and probably all future purchases, are as stripped down as I can get from Apple. Cheapest graphics card (these machines don't even have their own monitor, what do I need a good graphics card for?), no modem, smallest hard drive, etc. I don't think I could do without the hard drive entirely, since running physics simulation code on the cluster occasionally requires individual nodes to do a local write to a file. My main concern is for two things: gigabit ethernet and the processor. I'd love to see more cache on the processor and a faster system bus (currently my large scale jobs have to write to the hard drive, which eats up a ton of time).
Anyway, it would be nice for Apple to address the cluster/server crowd directly. It looks like, for the links given above, that the server crowd does have some good options. To be honest, I think the scaled-down versions of the PowerMac G4s at the Apple store are a pretty good buy for someone building a mac cluster. So no complaints here. Saving some extra $ with cheaper graphics cards or smaller hard drives would be nice, but not essential. The benefits of Apple hardware and OS X entirely outweigh those considerations.