So, throw away anything that has glass, ceramic, sapphire, etc?Any design that promotes disgusting fingerprints is a BAD ONE. You'd think Apple would not this by now.
So, throw away anything that has glass, ceramic, sapphire, etc?Any design that promotes disgusting fingerprints is a BAD ONE. You'd think Apple would not this by now.
Demo. models on tables without cases. You never know if people purposely scratched them but if they did the regular 12's you know they did the pros also. No pros had damage though.
HahahaIt's sad but Apple knows stainless sucks, but do it anyway because they needed a way to differentiate the Pro line and make it look more premium, regardless of how ugly it looks in daily use.
What’s the source for this?It's sad but Apple knows stainless sucks, but do it anyway because they needed a way to differentiate the Pro line and make it look more premium, regardless of how ugly it looks in daily use.
His arse....What’s the source for this?
While some who might be are 3 feet tall, and weigh 40 pounds may say it’s extremely heavy, but a grown person will never use the word extremely. It might be heavier than the aluminum, but to use the word extremely is way out there and not accurate. Wow, the words that some throw around is unbelievable.
It’s far superior. Jewelry, watches, medical tools, premium phones. The iPhones 12’s look like crayons.
It would be good if you actually quoted the correct MPa for the correct alloy used rather than disingenuously picking a softer alloy for your example. 7075 that Apple use in iPhones and watches has a tensile strength of 570MPa. If it only had 276MPa like you suggest, it wouldn’t be good enough for many of its chosen applications, especially aircraft! The deflection on both materials is roughly the same. This is obviously a subject where you’ve just badly googled an answer.Strength to weight ratio
Aluminum has a tensile strength of 276 MPa and a density of 2.81gcm-3. Aluminum is, therefore, lighter than steel. Stainless steel has a tensile strength of 505 MPa and a density of 8 gcm-3. Stainless steel is, therefore, stronger than aluminum.
You basically googled types of aluminum then called out someone for searching. Aluminum and stainless is not the same. That’s just basic science.It would be good if you actually quoted the correct MPa for the correct alloy used rather than disingenuously picking a softer alloy for your example. 7075 that Apple use in iPhones and watches has a tensile strength of 570MPa. If it only had 276MPa like you suggest, it wouldn’t be good enough for many of its chosen applications, especially aircraft! The deflection on both materials is roughly the same. This is obviously a subject where you’ve just badly googled an answer.
By aluminum you actually mean plastic right? 😖Sorry but I’ll take stainless steel all day if I wanted aluminium I’d get a Samsung![]()
I doubled checked in my Sapa handbook as despite being a mechanical engineer, even I don’t remember the megapascal rates of all steels and alloys. I do know how to interpret the data though.You basically googled types of aluminum then called out someone for searching. Aluminum and stainless is not the same. That’s just basic science.
Stainless steel is more desirably and stronger than aluminum. Doesn’t matter what tensil strength apple Uses. Doesn’t matter what your sappy handbook says. I can link hundreds of research and data between aluminum and steel but that’s useless. You just want to argue something that has proven to be false for no reason other than to justify buying the cheap phone.I doubled checked in my Sapa handbook as despite being a mechanical engineer, even I don’t remember the megapascal rates of all steels and alloys. I do know how to interpret the data though.
Of course stainless steel and aluminium is not the same but the person I quoted gave a much lower MPa for some generic alloy rather than the high grade 7075 that Apple use. That in disingenuous to say the least because had they quoted the correct tensile strength, it works out roughly the same as surgical grade stainless, hence why it is used by Apple for the same application.
If you feel you can dispute what I am saying then please do so with more than a sentence like ‘that’s just basic science’. I am all ears.
Well, isn't heavy a matter of comparison too? Let's take a bike as an example, I'm sure probably the majority of us can lift a bike, but certainly there are some that are heavier than others, thus when you pick one that in comparison is heavier you say: it's really heavy! Not really sure why it's so hard to comprehend