Their espresso coffees are huge, weak as piss and filled full of sugary syrups. One shot in a cup the size of their "tall" (which is the standard dose) is pathetic - that cup is so big that two or even three shots would be more appropriate. The short cup is more appropriate for a cappuccino (a cap should be no more than about 5 to 6 ounces in the US parlance with a one ounce shot of espresso - Starbucks put one ounce of coffee in a 12 ounce cup which is ridiculous) and tastes much better.
🙁 I used to go to Peets almost everyday since it was on my way to work...ever since I left that job, there's no easy way for me to get to Peets
But still on the photo it looks nice!!That brings up a very important point:
Never ask for a cappuccino at Starbucks. Uggh. Not only will you likely end up with a 16 or 20 oz. monstrosity, but they'll inevitably ask you whether you want it "Wet or Dry" Starbucks seems to have a Seattle-style dry cappuccino fetish, and most Starbucks baristi don't understand that real cappuccinos aren't at all dry, are never in a size larger than 8 oz. (5 or 6 is more appropriate, as Chundles said), and are never, never, never served in paper cups. If you don't end up with something like this:
![]()
... then it isn't a real cappuccino.
There. I think that takes care of that. 😀
But still on the photo it looks nice!!
I believe the photo was not an example of Starbucks deCappuccino (think decapitated 😉), but of some good Cappuccino.
ah okay i understand, isn't there a contest making the most beautiful design on the top of the coffee??
Indeed there is. It's called the World Barista Championship, although it covers flavour and technique as well as presentation.
I'm sure Starbucks don't care about making beautiful coffee, only making the most coffee.
Why are all decent London coffee shops run or staffed by Antipodeans? 😕