It is 64-bit, however the client doesn't seem to update to the 64-bit version, you have to go to the Steam website and download it again.
Ah, that'll explain it then. Mine is still 32-bit even on the latest one. I'll download it again. Thanks!
It is 64-bit, however the client doesn't seem to update to the 64-bit version, you have to go to the Steam website and download it again.
Ah, that'll explain it then. Mine is still 32-bit even on the latest one. I'll download it again. Thanks!
Can you give a link to that, or is it just a pre-installed version patched? Snow Leopard is a great OS.I'm still running Steam on 10.6.8 Snow Leopard myself ^.^ its an edited version that doesn't auto-update. I always get warned that support for my version will end in 2015 but it plays my existing games fine and can still download stuff.
![]()
Can you give a link to that, or is it just a pre-installed version patched? Snow Leopard is a great OS.
Thanks, running Snow Leopard on a 2008 iMac and a 2008 MacBook CE. I also have Sierra installed on them for anything modern I do thanks to dosdude1's patch.Here ya go, fellow Snow cat ^.^ Now, there are some things to keep in mind... it isn't very compatible with newer games so don't bother installing things like Civilization VI or Cities Skylines. Also I haven't attempted to make a purchase using it, I just downloaded my existing games.
https://www.filehosting.org/file/details/529695/7rHF2fk29LjB9b8H/Steam.app.zip
I’m pumped up for when they drop macOS for good next year, when 90% of my library doesn’t run because the hundreds of games I own are all 32-bit! Thanks for taking away my fun Apple, you know what’s best for me! I didn’t need Steam Link either!
Apple hates gaming on the Mac, so they couldn't be happier.
This is the kind of reckoning we shouldn’t be terribly surprised by, but it is disappointing nonetheless. I’ve often asked the question: ‘What would happen to my Steam games if Valve were to suddenly go under?’. Steam games require Steam to be running in order to launch. ‘Offline mode’ is finicky and if I remember correctly, must first be set when you’re...online. This kind of defeats the purpose in many respects. In any case, there is a big question mark hanging over the status of our games if Valve were to shut down. This was rarely true of physical copies before they were locked down to online stores (the physical edition of Fallout 4 is hilariously a single DVD that essentially just provides a Steam code so you can download the game).
In any case, now we have a new and somewhat unexpected issue: ‘What happens if Steam won’t run on my previously supported hardware - hardware that still runs the games I intend to play on it?’. If I boot a Windows 95 machine and have the right hardware to play the Win95 version of ‘Tie Fighter’, it will run. As a collector of old Macs, I can expect a copy of ‘Prince of Persia’ to run as well on a Macintosh LC running System 7.1 today as it did when it was released in the early 1990s.
Steam - and other digital game stores like it (GOG being the only possible exception I’m aware of) turn this whole relationship with our digital past upside down. In 20 years, will I be able to play ‘Factorio’ on my vintage laptop if I happen to have purchased the Steam version? It looks highly doubtful, and that’s terribly sad for those of us who find comfort and joy in returning to old software OR for the larger number of us whose backlog is so long that they’ll be dead before they make even the slightest dent.
Seems like a lot of hyperbole in this post. Especially since Apple isn't the one restricting anything related to this post.I don't see why you kids keep updating to the latest "and greatest" versions of OS X anyway... things get uglier and flatter every release and the system becomes more and more restrictive and hammered down.
In my opinion you should use the OS version that gives you the features you NEED and can't live without, not just upgrade for the hell of it. Apple used to be a company where you'd want the newest, shiniest bit of kit but now they're just a glorified fashion designer company.
Seems like a lot of hyperbole in this post. Especially since Apple isn't the one restricting anything related to this post.
Seems like a poor business model. Selling people the games then telling them that the games will no longer run even though they still have the older computer / OS.
Would people still be able to run the older games in offline mode ?
If you want to continue playing an old school game, you may need to maintain an old school gaming box.
I don't see why you kids keep updating to the latest "and greatest" versions of OS X anyway... things get uglier and flatter every release and the system becomes more and more restrictive and hammered down.
In my opinion you should use the OS version that gives you the features you NEED and can't live without, not just upgrade for the hell of it. Apple used to be a company where you'd want the newest, shiniest bit of kit but now they're just a glorified fashion designer company.
Would you expect an auto maker to maintain a business line of autmobiles for sale forever? Sooner or later, they gotta move on. If you choose to own a classic car, you’ve got to deal with classic car maintenance, and you may find you need a day-to-day driver to get to work. The privilege to be able to play games on a computer is just that, a privilege, not a right. No software company wil offer a warrantee that extends into perpetuity. Similarly, no software author os going to guarantee that your platform will last forever.
If you want to continue playing an old school game, you may need to maintain an old school gaming box.
Both unfortunately have the problem that they are still 32 bit apps and apparently are no longer maintained: Wineskin got its last update about a year ago, Boxer even almost three years ago.
Sadly I think owning any type of media will be impossible soon.This is exactly what annoys me the most about this. I would be happy just forgetting about Steam altogether, but this exclusivity nonsense is what drives me away from PC gaming. If I can buy a physical copy of a game for a console instead, I will always choose this one over Steam-exclusive PC version.
Does this even work if the Steam client itself is no longer working/supported?
Seems like a lot of hyperbole in this post. Especially since Apple isn't the one restricting anything related to this post.
Yeah I run most of my games within windows. Performance on macOS is a joke for a lot of games anyways.
Both unfortunately have the problem that they are still 32 bit apps and apparently are no longer maintained: Wineskin got its last update about a year ago, Boxer even almost three years ago.
As for "hyperbole" well, I can make up words too, you... you...festizio!