we all knew that apple cant keep up with intel... but they will get there eventually. be patient.
It does seem funny though:
We waited and waited and waited for something that didn't ever happen. Blaming IBM, Apple said IBM couldn't produce the processors they wanted fast enough to make it happen.
Then, Apple announces a switch to Intel and IBM starts rolling processors out quickly.
Now, Apple's switched to Intel, and we're waiting, and waiting, and waiting, and waiting again. Only this time we're waiting longer for updates than before. And, the updated and faster products are already available from Intel.
So, now we're waiting on Apple and not the processor manufacturer.
It would now appear as though Apple just can't keep-up in the computer industry, and has just been using IBM as a convenient excuse or scapegoat.
The problem, is that now that Apple is using roughly the same hardware as everyone else, this lack of forward movement makes it really easy to see Apple as being slow to adopt and a trailing computer company.
When Apple is the last one to implement the latest processors, it doesn't exactly scream market leader.
HP, Compaq, and several others had the quad-core processors implemented within a week to two weeks of Intel announcing. Some took around a month. But, to date, Apple hasn't even delivered (or implied that they intend to).
And, when you consider that the Mac Pro sells for $2500 to $3000 and even higher, it's hard to shell out that kind of money for a machine that doesn't implement the latest technology.