Speaking from a physician's point of view, this makes very little sense. Some aspect of what was said before or this new story is false. I've taken care of a number of people on transplant lists. Qualifying for a liver transplant is extremely difficult. You have to be near death's door to qualify, and with good reason. The surgery is a complete mayhem. Your liver is responsible for making coagulation factors, among its many duties. So shortly after the old liver is taken out, everything starts bleeding. If you make it through the surgery, there is acute rejection to get through, along with the opportunistic infections, medication toxicities, etc. Transplanting patients with cancer is extremely controversial, as usually the cancer has spread beyond just the liver, even if you can't see it on any scans. And all of this doesn't fit in with what Steve said in his letter. Steve did not have the appearance of someone with chronic liver disease. It would be unusual to come back to work so soon after this kind of procedure as well.
Of course, Steve's health information is private and his own. But when he sends a letter, if that letter is deliberately deceptive, all bets are off and shareholders have a right to be angry if they've been misled.
Dave
Forstall, for instance, has remarked that: "I actually have a photographer's loupe that I use to make sure every pixel is right," he told Time. "We will argue over literally a single pixel." THAT is the kind of thinking and language that seems to suggest that not all is lost if Jobs should, by natural causes or otherwise, become completely uninvolved with Apple.
I, for one, think Bertrand Serlet strikes an extremely interesting figure . . .
The guardian called this all the way back in Jan.. six months ago.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/jan/16/steve-jobs-bloomberg-transplant-claim
Also, don't forget Jony Ive.
Apple has been doing quite well while SJ has been gone, but I'm sure that all the stuff they've released lately has been planned out months before...when Jobs was still there.
Speaking from a physician's point of view, this makes very little sense. Some aspect of what was said before or this new story is false. I've taken care of a number of people on transplant lists. Qualifying for a liver transplant is extremely difficult. You have to be near death's door to qualify, and with good reason. The surgery is a complete mayhem. Your liver is responsible for making coagulation factors, among its many duties. So shortly after the old liver is taken out, everything starts bleeding. If you make it through the surgery, there is acute rejection to get through, along with the opportunistic infections, medication toxicities, etc. Transplanting patients with cancer is extremely controversial, as usually the cancer has spread beyond just the liver, even if you can't see it on any scans. And all of this doesn't fit in with what Steve said in his letter. Steve did not have the appearance of someone with chronic liver disease. It would be unusual to come back to work so soon after this kind of procedure as well.
Of course, Steve's health information is private and his own. But when he sends a letter, if that letter is deliberately deceptive, all bets are off and shareholders have a right to be angry if they've been misled.
Dave
Yes, but the CAUSE of this liver transplant (metastatic pancreatic cancer) has an extremely poor prognosis even with a pancreaticoduodenectomy (5 year all-cause mortality >95%). In the case of metastatic disease, I would expect that mortality would be even greater. Pancreatic cancer is hard to find, difficult to treat and aggressive. I wish him the best.
I hate to quote entire messages, but I couldn't agree with you more. The demise of many large companies is loss of vision, too many people doing too many things. I too fear for the long term success once he's gone (hence my anger if the facts are being hidden from investors).
I so hope that he is healing and well, but I so doubt that is the case.
So, uh, two things:
A. This confirms that he lied to everyone--most importantly shareholders--6 months ago.
B. This confirms that he, like Mickey Mantle before him, officially thinks he is better than everyone else on the waiting list for livers.
So he is a liar and a narcissist. Not a big shock considering we're talking about the Steve Jobs.
It's obvious that Steve's people leaked this story. Its timing is perfect:
1. Its the weekend (so it can't hurt the stock price and won't slam the newswires)
2. Its right after a major product launch (allowing the iphone to steal news time from this story)
3. Its the week before he's going to return (so now he doesn't have to explain much)
I wonder if he owns the Gulfstream jet he used for these trips or if its company property (if its company property Apple might have some legal problems...connect the use of the jet to the company "knowing" and "assisting" in covering up the health problems of a major executive.
Someone should find Al Gore and thank him for the hook-up (he's on the board and I think he pulled a few strings here for Steve).
I consider myself very lucky and again urge everyone who has taken the time to post to this forum, to take the time to register as an organ donor.
Is it so easy for someone to get a liver transplant in U.S , or did he wait in line with others for his turn ?
In Tennessee there is a 48 day waiting period. Thats where Jobs supposedly got the replacement and thats all that we know.Is it so easy for someone to get a liver transplant in U.S , or did he wait in line with others for his turn ?
I wouldn't call that a small point. It's a huge one, and one that I'd say the great majority of people aren't aware of. There is protocol involved with organ donation such that many people who would've wanted to donate don't get the chance. What it says on your drivers license has very little bearing on whether you get to donate.One small point. It is not enough to register as an organ donor on your driver's license. No matter what your license says, unless your next of kin give permission for organ donation, you will not be a donor. So even more important than clicking the donation box on your license, is making sure your family knows your wishes should the unthinkable occur.
The story being told was that they opened him up and found that he had the much less serious kind, not "metastatic pancreatic cancer."
That study was for a specific form of liver cancer. People receive transplants for a variety of reasons and the long-term survival rates vary widely based on age and reason for transplant.
I wouldn't call that a small point. It's a huge one, and one that I'd say the great majority of people aren't aware of. There is protocol involved with organ donation such that many people who would've wanted to donate don't get the chance. What it says on your drivers license has very little bearing on whether you get to donate.
In my training, when we were faced with a situation where a patient had no hope of recovery but had viable organs, we were never permitted to approach the family about organ donation. The family had to be the ones to bring the subject up. Even if the person had clearly marked on their drivers' license "Organ Donor" you were not allowed to mention that fact.
The best way to insure that you are considered for organ donation is to select a person you trust to act as your durable medical power of attorney, and tell that person that if you are ever in a seemingly hopeless situation, you want them to bring up the subject of organ donation with the attending physician.
Dave
You are unbelievably out of touch with reality.
EVERYTHING that is Apple, from the **** mouse to the great industrial designs, from the complete lack of gaming support to great strong focus on music... EVERYTHING from A to Z is Steve Jobs and Steve Jobs alone.
Steve Jobs has an hypnotic-like charisma that is nearly unequaled in the business world and when he goes for good, so will Apple. Within a few years
it will lose focus again and become another generic tech company, but unlike