Too many people have started to worship him like a God.
Don't give the rest of the users a bad name.
Don't give the rest of the users a bad name.
A new physical design, is not a redesign. Got itFirst of all if the iPhone 5(if that is even the name of it) does look like the leaked photos, Isn't a redesign. What planet do you live on. To stretch the screen of the iPhone 4/4s a half of inch. Change up the internals a bit. Doesn't qualify as a redesigned iPhone. It's an 4 inch iPhone 4/4s with some new guts.
A new physical design, is not a redesign. Got it
lol, come on now..
What? !
You want the truth... OK
He was _Obsessed_ with thin!
Is that more to your liking?
If not, help a guy out.![]()
I recall hearing last year just after the great Mr Jobs died, that he personally worked on this iPhone that we all are expecting to see last year. I read he had nothin to do with the iPhone 4S. Now if this is true all these leaked parts of the iPhone can't be what is in store for us Sept 12. Jobs would have never allowed apple to just release a larger screen iPhone 4/4s. That's not a redesign. What do u think people. And can anyone recall hearing about this.
I grew up in Cupertino, some friends still work at Apple. The rumor going around and around for years was just what I stated. Could it be wrong? Absolutely.I just meant that it's a stretch to state that he desired a thin iPhone merely because he himself was thin![]()
Sorry, but.... Is this really important ?![]()
Nope
Cause no one can say for sure yet if the new iPhone will be two toned or one solid color all the way around.
No argument from me that that Steve Jobs was a visionary (with considerable credit to his design team also) etc., but even he could not have been able to accurately predict what Apple's competitors have and will be doing for the next 5 years. Apple has to adapt to it's competition, just as Apple's competition adapts to Apple.
Personally I'd be rather worried about Apple's future if it was religiously following one person's roadmap. Apple's hardware and iOS influence third party developed iOS applications and competitor's offerings, which in turn should influence Apple's decisions regarding iOS core functionality and hardware.
Innovation is great, having a strong vision is great, being blind to the market place is not.
I guess you work for apple then. Cause no one can say for sure yet if the new iPhone will be two toned or one solid color all the way around. Rumors are floating all over the net bout the real look of the device. Assumptions make people look like You can fill in the blank.
There´s an obvoius similarity between iphone 4s and the iphone 5, you just can´t deny that. As there is between the lumia phones...
It´s not a redesign, it´s a little different, but not a redesign in my eyes. Yes, it is now a unibody, but who can see this? I can´t... I see alot more similaritys than differenses. And the differensen are only color and material. The overall shape and look is identical to the 4/4S no matter what you say.
Conceptually, Steve was sure to have high level input in iPhone5, but the design and minutia was sure to be all Ives, Cook, and Forstal.
The leaked design does seem to have the touch of Jobs.
And maybe even the iPhone 5S next year also has Steve Jobs hands on it. But after that, I doubt it, I would think the iPhone 6 due in 2014 will be the first iPhone mostly done without Jobs involvement, and we see how that goes ? Could be a much better product compared to the competition, or it will have lost something, and start to go down in sales...time will tell
Yes, the simple elongated display... instead of a radical change forcing developers to embrace resolution independence... has Jobs' non-techie salesman influence written all over it.
Just as with the pixel doubling, it's an easy way of updating the screen while still keeping legacy app support. Minimal size change also plays to the consumer who is comfortable with what they have now. Ditto for lack of major iOS modifications.
In other words, Apple is getting trapped with legacy tech and market issues just as others had been. Not having those problems was a major factor that allowed Apple to leap ahead in 2007. Now they seem headed down the same path that Windows Mobile, RIM OS and Symbian took. They're afraid of messing too much with a known success.
You're looking at those same rumours and making assumptions it hasn't changed. So you're not only making an assumption yourself, you're making a stupid assumption..
----------
So WTF DO you want? A round phone? A pyramid? A spike? A dildo? A t-bone steak? A football?
This is a good question, i would like to see what the biggest critics on here post a drawing or mock up of what direction they think Apple should take the iPhone.
I can't post a picture, but what I want is:
half the thickness
twice the memory
twice the battery life
half the weight.
scratch and dent proof - let me toss it around for 2 years and resell as pristine.
Oh, and when I want one, it should extract atoms from the surrounding air and form them into a hardware keyboard. When I'm done typing, it should reform again into chocolate chip cookies.
If Steve was alive we'd have this already. Tim just isn't up to the job.
I assume you are not, i was though. I would like to know what changes in design and shape that the critics on her would like to see. Again not spec changes just shape and design.
Well I'm not one of those critics. Basically a phone is a flattish rectangle for the same reason a TV, computer monitor and movie screen are - they're 95% display.
So the only big changes I want to see in an iPhone are those that are currently unachievable. You're not going to get an answer that makes sense. Oh sure, you can move the home button, change the colour, etc. But nothing that will count as a real redesign that will satisfy the critics who don't even know what they want to see.