Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Up in the Clouds...

Neat!

Last time I cared, reviews still kinda recommended turning off Flash in Android devices. Has that improved lately?

No.

Walt Mossberg Tells Adobe CEO To His Face That Flash Sucks on Android
http://www.cultofmac.com/98231/walt...-ceo-to-his-face-that-flash-sucks-on-android/

Screen-shot-2011-06-02-at-5.20.54-PM.png
 
Flash not only eats clock cycles, ram and battery, it also makes your hardware look buggy. When Bad Flash (There is no good Flash) crashes your browser, it does not make Flash look bad, it makes your browser look bad. Flash also ate into the key way Apple intends to make money and control quality. If People could run Flash on IOS, there would be no way to control what apps ran on IOS. Everyone would just port everything to Flash and put it on the web with no QC gateway.
......

1. Flash has memory leaks that crash not only Flash but other applications including the OS (Even after Flash has exited.)

2. By allowing Flash, you get lots of Trash apps that could have been better coded using a real programming language.

You left out Flash = major security liability.

Flash 10.1, October 28, 2010: Flash 10.1 Suffering Yet Another Security Exploit, Adobe Issuing Update November 9th

Flash 10.2, April 12, 2011: Security flaw in Flash 10.2 threatens Android devices

Flash 10.3, June 8, 2011: Adobe Warns Android Users About Flash Security Vulnerability

Flash 10.3.183.7, September 22, 2011: Adobe releases urgent Flash Player security update

One hopes that Apple University will continue to inspire current and future Apple employees that part of Steve's genius emanated from believing one should not focus on what customers think they want, but rather what they really want but don't even know it.
 
Last edited:
Wow, what an honor! Like Hamburger U.

Jobs had no desire to see Apple succeed after he was gone. If you disagree, either you don't know Jobs or don't want to know Jobs. Exhibit #1: iPhone 4S.

RIP

The iPhone 4S is the exact phone Steve Jobs would have presented on Tuesday if he were healthy and still running the company. Don't be a moron.
 
Wow, what an honor! Like Hamburger U.

Jobs had no desire to see Apple succeed after he was gone. If you disagree, either you don't know Jobs or don't want to know Jobs. Exhibit #1: iPhone 4S.

RIP

Is that why his last public appearance was before the Cupertino City Council asking for permission to create a gargantuan, new iconic headquarters? Is it part of his master plan to build Apple to the zenith of success and then speed it toward bankruptcy once he was gone?

If what you're really suggesting is that Steve Jobs had a large ego, then why wouldn't he want a legacy that lives on? :confused:
 
It's ironic that someone who barely attended college, let alone graduating from one, creates his own university.
 
Think everyone should stop worrying

I have seen the numerous threads about what will happen next etc and how will Apple go on now after Steve's death. I think everyone need to calm down and stop worrying.

The reason I say this is that, don't you think Steve would have spoken about this when he was alive with everyone at Apple, in how the company should go on and what they should concentrate on, such as the next OS X and next iPhone products and the next Mac's?

I am sure he has already discussed this and set out a road map for the future, and this Iuniversity he set up is all for the future for his dream for the company to proceed as he see's best. Also in relation to Tim Cook, I am glad he chose him when he was alive at Apple, as he has his faith in him and he chose him for a reason and we should all accept his choice and let him lead Apple forward.

Plus Apple have a great team, designers and people behind them. As long as Apple has us the followers of Apple, Apple will continue to be stronger and stronger. I am sure the next version of Mac OS X and iPhones and Macs are already being discussed and worked on. So lets relax and look towards the great future Apple has.

Oh and top of that I am sure Apple will continue to see what Walt Mossberg's advice is on new products and make sure he is always on board and happy before bringing out future products.
:eek:) :apple: for life
 
Last edited:
Holy crap. That was good. Thanks.

It's being easier for the whole industry to get up to speed with Flash-less alternatives than for Adobe to clean up the Flash crapfest. Heh.

I actually like flash on my phone...i set it on 'On Demand" and only use it if i need it.

Its good to not worry about compromising..even if its not an amazing version of flash (those who say its crap are just being dramatic...its FAR from crap...its serviceable.).
 
Apple becomes a religion, looks like.

If you look at any non-trivial organization, whether business, a nation, military, and yes, even religions, a key item in that organization's long-term success, or even continued existence, is some means to collect, analyze, understand and maintain and develop institutional memory.

You seem to think it's a bad thing. It's not.
 
I actually like flash on my phone...i set it on 'On Demand" and only use it if i need it.

Good for you.
I know the first thing I would have done is disable it or look for FlashBlock alternatives. I stay away from Flash in my computers, Macs and Windows, so I can't see why I would do differently on a phone.

Of course, having the option is good. But for me at least, not even having the option vs. the rest of the phone is a no-second-thoughts trade off

Anecdote: only once I found a website (for a shop) that I could not use on the iPhone because it was fully Flash. That already smelled like a crappy website, but I confirmed it when I accessed it from the computer: it was barely navigable even then, and anyway the info I wanted wasn't there (something as basic as opening hours). My thesis: if it's worth seeing it, it doesn't require Flash.

Its good to not worry about compromising..even if its not an amazing version of flash (those who say its crap are just being dramatic...its FAR from crap...its serviceable.).

If it is not "an amazing version", then you are already compromising.
 
Wow, what an honor! Like Hamburger U.

And yet, you completely miss the point.

Macdonalds has understood for a long time that they depend in large part on product consistency; not just the menu, but the way individual sites operate and present to the public. It just happens to be a well-known part of the business, and and easy butt of jokes.

Jobs had no desire to see Apple succeed after he was gone. If you disagree, either you don't know Jobs or don't want to know Jobs. Exhibit #1: iPhone 4S.

RIP

If you think for a minute that Jobs didn't see a successful Apple very much as an enduring legacy, you really don't understand the man. That much was crystal clear to anyone who worked at the company during his initial tenure. The 14 years after his return should have made that clear time and time again.
 
We'll only know how successful this is when Tim or others do an about-face and reject one of Steve's peeves. Continuing the turtlenecked one's petty grievances is disrespecting the Apple that Steve created.

Embrace Flash and Blu-ray - Apple's customers want them. Lay off the legal team that's trying to sue everyone else in the industry. Pay for other companies' IP that you're using, and forget the nonsense that a tablet form factor is a holy design.

Much of the value of the Apple brand is coolness, and all the lawsuits are very, very uncool.

What is the basis for rejecting Steve's peeves? Every decision should be made with Apple's best interests in mind. And you can't argue with success. Even with the "turtlenecked one's petty grievances," Apple is within striking distance of being the most valuable company in the world by market cap.

Any brand is defined by the customer's experience with the products. Apple's products have been good to its customers so they continue to buy them.

And about IP, the fact is that Apple invested the resources to come up with it. It's their right to protect it. Why should Apple just sit back and let others rip off their IP.

And as for "paying for other companies' IP," you must be referring to Nokia. Apple did not refuse to license Nokia's patents. Apple's issue was over the amount of the licensing fees.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.