Actually it does. It depends on what were the causes of his cancer and how he reacted to treatment. He lived a high stress life. Worked long hours and over thought everything.
Lack of sleep, stress, and improper dieting habits are things that can put a heavy dent into any recovery program. I am no doctor, but it doesn't take a degree to know that.
Lets be narrow-mided though so we can sound smart!
He worked long hours and tended to get quite excited from time to time. He also knew how to relax and ate a far better diet than 98% of us.
I don't quite understand the use of the word "premature" in this situation. Yes, in essence every death is premature. But the reality is no one can live forever, especially with a certainly-fatal illness.
This man had been living with one of the worst types cancer for, at least, seven years. This man had to endure too many painful medical treatments, especially ones with unfavorable survival rates. In addition to the many others we may never know about, Randy Pausch and Patrick Swayze both publicly battled this same fate, but on a much, much faster pace after they were symptomatic.
I don't look at this as a "premature" death. Unfortunate? Yes. Tragic? Absolutely. But not unexpected and definitely not premature. We all knew it was coming. We just didn't want it to. I look at this and am glad to have seen him on this earth for a few extra years. Perhaps they were his greatest.
Many people who have far less impact on the world live to be over 100. Many of those who have the most profound influence and who have the most to give, die young removing from us the things they could have created and the lessons they could teach the next generation.
We'll only know how successful this is when Tim or others do an about-face and reject one of Steve's peeves. Continuing the turtlenecked one's petty grievances is disrespecting the Apple that Steve created.
Embrace Flash and Blu-ray - Apple's customers want them. Lay off the legal team that's trying to sue everyone else in the industry. Pay for other companies' IP that you're using, and forget the nonsense that a tablet form factor is a holy design.
Much of the value of the Apple brand is coolness, and all the lawsuits are very, very uncool.
Flash not only eats clock cycles, ram and battery, it also makes your hardware look buggy. When Bad Flash (There is no good Flash) crashes your browser, it does not make Flash look bad, it makes your browser look bad. Flash also ate into the key way Apple intends to make money and control quality. If People could run Flash on IOS, there would be no way to control what apps ran on IOS. Everyone would just port everything to Flash and put it on the web with no QC gateway.
As to the Lawsuits, any company that does not protect it's IP does not stay a company.
Wow, what an honor! Like Hamburger U.
Jobs had no desire to see Apple succeed after he was gone. If you disagree, either you don't know Jobs or don't want to know Jobs. Exhibit #1: iPhone 4S.
RIP
I don't think you understand the reason why Apple did what they did. The MDM9615 will not hit the market until q2 2012. The MDM9600 is battery eating garbage that takes up too much real estate. Apple will get better performance with HSPA+ on ATT and better life on everything else. They could have redesigned the shell, however, a smaller shell would reduce battery time.
Apple made the correct decision (I would have been upset if they had chosen to use technology that was not ready for the market.)
You can't say that most "don't care".
Anything useful (or entertaining) eats CPU - what's your battery after a six hour Angry Birds rampage? My tablet gets from 7 hours to 90 minutes battery life, depending on what I'm doing. (Light surfing/email - 7 hours. Visual Studio project builds with a couple of busy virtual machines - as low as 90 minutes.)
All you can say is that Apple users have either weighed the options and have decided that an Itoy is good for them even without flash support - or they're clueless and probably wouldn't even understand the question.
And, by the way, Android outsells IOS - and Android supports Flash.
_________________
Anyway - my point wasn't an argument for/against Flash.
It's that if Apple is really true to Steve's legacy, Tim&Co won't be afraid to try things.
Steve said that nobody read books - now we have Ibooks.
Steve said that nobody wants to watch videos on a handheld - right.
Steve said that Apple wouldn't make a phone - yeah, sure.
Steve has reversed course on lots of things - often because the hardware evolved. It would not have been possible to make a color video Ipod with acceptable battery life when Ipod I was released. A few years later, however, no problem.
If the A5 has the power, and Apple makes the acceleration APIs public so that Adobe can use them - it would be very "Jobs-like" to have a keynote and trumpet that "The Iphone 5 supports Flash".
People who don't realize that would flunk out of "Apple U".
1. Flash has memory leaks that crash not only Flash but other applications including the OS (Even after Flash has exited.)
2. By allowing Flash, you get lots of Trash apps that could have been better coded using a real programming language.
______________
You can't train a person to be a genius, however, you can select the potential geniuses from a group, then give them the tools they need to be their best. This is what real education is.