Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Re: Re: Apple Office app

Originally posted by JJTiger1
Well I'll be darned: the new Office app is MS Office 2004. :mad:
... probably only works in VPC 7.

AND

a new iLife for when I'm not in the real world.

I will wait until next Friday to verify that iDVD '04 will install on my non-DVD equipped G4-733. Steve said that the new iDVD could build DVD's on a non-DVD equipped Mac. :confused:
=-=
JJ
http://www.powerbook1.com/

offers DVD burner upgrades for several Macs.
 
Re: Re: Re: Apple Office app

Originally posted by gopher
http://www.powerbook1.com/

offers DVD burner upgrades for several Macs.

Code: DVDR4XDT-D
Price: $149.00

Decent price for a DVD burner for my QS-733.

Thanks for the info.
... I'm not ready, just yet.
=-=
First: I want to learn the app.
Then: when I master the app, I will buy the burner.

That is the basis of my concern about installing iDVD on a non-DVD equipped Mac.

If I can't learn the app, then there is no sense in throwing $149 at the computer.
=-=
JJ
 
Re: Re: Re: Apple Office app

Originally posted by gopher
Office for X lacks a database which is a real weakness. There was talk about a year ago about bringing Visual Basic support to Realbasic, the crossplatform programming language. And what is one of the major componants of Access? Visual Basic! Not to mention there is even a Visual Basic extension in older versions of Microsoft Excel for the Mac. So the question becomes, can Microsoft overcome their pride and finally release Access for the Mac? Or will Apple team with Realbasic and release their own Access compatible version of Filemaker together in an Office suite for the Mac? Only time will tell.

This is the first time I've heard anyone in the Mac universe pushing Access. What does Access offer that Filemaker developers won't get with FM 7, 4D or various SQL variants, or even Oracle?

BTW, I understand that Filemaker interfaces seamlessly with Office, and is very popular in the PC market, albeit not on the level of Access. If Microsoft can make an OSX version, with Applescript support, then, there might be takers.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Apple Office app

Originally posted by JJTiger1

First: I want to learn the app.
Then: when I master the app, I will buy the burner.

...

If I can't learn the app, then there is no sense in throwing $149 at the computer.


iDVD is a breeze...you'll be buying that burner soon!:)
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Apple Office app

Originally posted by TMay
This is the first time I've heard anyone in the Mac universe pushing Access. What does Access offer that Filemaker developers won't get with FM 7, 4D or various SQL variants, or even Oracle?

BTW, I understand that Filemaker interfaces seamlessly with Office, and is very popular in the PC market, albeit not on the level of Access. If Microsoft can make an OSX version, with Applescript support, then, there might be takers.

Granted, but the point is, why pay $180 on top of Office's already exorbitant cost to have a database? On Windows a database is already included at the same cost. Granted Filemaker is a better database than Access, but most Microsoft Access users don't know that. And remember we are talking about making Microsoft Office attractive on the Mac so that more PC users will not hesitate to buy a Mac.
 
where is the iSlate?

The technology is available to provide consumers with a product like "iSlate". Of course only Apple could really do it right, although several other companies are attempting to create some variation of this device. Unfortunately many are too focused on video playback only, & not creating a true multi-function device that could be used at home, at the office, or on the road. This product would integrate well into the "Digital Lifestyle" philosophy & compliment existing Apple product. It would provide a screen large enough to actually watch video & view photos, while still being small enough to be portable. It needs to be smaller than a notebook computer, but larger than a PDA. Granted, you can not but a device the size of a DVD case in your pocket, but something doesn't have to fit in a pocket to be portable. This device could be used in so many different situations that if would have broad appeal in the market. I only pray that Apple is working on such a device & will release it in 2004. They have an opportunity to impact the industry with the iSlate & iVideo media Store as much as the iPod & iTMS will.

iSlate

New Apple mini-tablet –> PMA (portable media appliance)

Designed not to be a creative device like a desktop or laptop, but rather a sophisticated display device that communicates seamlessly with other devices via Rendezvous & 802.11, BT, FireWire, etc.


Device Size:
8” x 5.0” x .65” (±15oz)
± 1/2 size of a 17” PowerBook
± 2x size of a Palm T3 or an iPod
± size of a DVD movie case
small enough to hold with one hand by the bezel (.5” bezel on the sides)

Screen:
±8” LCD (16:9 ratio) -> 800 x 480 pixels minimum (1024 x 600 ideally)
± 1/2 size of 17” PowerBook screen
± 2x size of a Palm T3 screen
able to display “640 x 480 material” & DVD (720x480) quality video natively

Battery:
6-9 hr. Li-Ion battery (or some new battery technology)

Storage:
1.8” 20GB or 40GB Toshiba hard drive (additional capacity can come from external devices)
128MB or 256MB RAM - fixed
CF slot (w/ adapter for SD, xD, Smart Media, Memory stick)

Processor & OS ?:
Motorola 800 MHz G4 mobile w/ Mac OS X lite or
Intel 400 MHz XScale PXA263 w/ Palm OS 6 or Mac OS Mobile?

Connectivity:
802.11 –> Desktop or Laptop, Stereo, Internet via Wi-Fi hotspots
Bluetooth –> Keyboard, Mouse, PDA, Wireless Headphones, Internet via GSM Phone
FireWire –> iPod, Computer, Hard Drive, DVD/CD writer, Video Camera, iSight
USB 2.0 –> Printer, PDA, Digital Still Camera
mini-DVI w/adapter for:
-> ADC & VGA for larger monitor
-> DVI for video projector or HDTV
-> S-Video for video projector or TV
-> Composite for video projector or TV
Stereo mini out
Stereo mini in
Rendezvous for seamless connectivity to other devices

Input:
Inkwell via touch screen &/or stylus
Keyboard & mouse via Bluetooth or USB
Microphone
Remote control via Bluetooth

Applications:
inkwell, iPhoto, iTunes, iMovie, Safari, QuickTime, iSync, Rendezvous
Preview or Acrobat Reader, Mail, iCal, Address Book, Sherlock, iChat AV
Keynote, FileMaker, Quicken,

A/V Formats:
Pixlet, MPEG-4, MPEG-2, MPEG-1, AAC, MP3, WAV, AIFF, Audible, JPEG, TIFF, GIF

Accessories:
Charger, External Battery, Stand, clip for iSight, Portable folding BT keyboard, BT mouse
Headphone w/Microphone boom, quality stereo headphones

Price ??:
$699 to $899


Create a device that is bigger that the largest PDA or Archos type device, yet smaller than the average notebook or tablet computer. Imagine if you will, holding a device (about the size of a DVD case) away from you anywhere from 12" to 18". Obviously a 4" screen would be inadequate, but a 7" to 9" diagonal widescreen would be more than acceptable. It could still be small enough to fit in a stack of books, a briefcase, a large purse, of any number of other carrying cases. It would be something that could be viewed in an office, at home, in a coffee shop, on an airplane or train, or even in the backseat of a car.

The idea is not to see how much visual information one can cram into a small space (3" to 4" screens) or replace existing devices like the TV or Video Projector. The idea is to create a device that is a reasonable compromise between portability & "acceptable or pleasurable" viewing for multiple applications & that also complements existing devices.

Although a 4 lb, 12" notebook computer displays video beautifully (I use one everyday), it is too big for the situations I have described. Beyond the innumerable business applications it could fulfill, it could display video & photos on a screen that is much bigger than an Archos type device or PDA, & yet smaller than a notebook computer. It doesn’t need to carry everything all the time, so it doesn’t require a massive hard drive. The internal HD needs only to be large enough for the OS, applications & enough storage to carry material while you away from any connectivity to other devices or the internet.

From a strictly “video perspective”, a large part of its success would hinge upon Apple's ability to distribute video clips through an online store much like iTMS. This store could provide educational content, business content, news content, & entertainment content beyond just movies. To be truly successful, it must integrate into Apple's "Digital Lifestyle" strategy, & be truly portable (ubiquitous wireless connectivity & good battery life).
 
I have one problem with the iSlate, there is no way they would go to intel for the processor. Also why would they want to put a G4 in it, no scalability and why use obsolete technology. Yeah it would probably run better for this application but they should wait till they can get the PB with a G5.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.