I don't understand why people get so torn about the size difference. Are people willing to give up a bigger screen to operate and better battery life for style? Is a slightly big watch on the wrist so horrible? I don't think so. I vote 42mm.
I don't have large wrists. Thin guy. And the 38 looked too small on me. I'm amazed at all the men who are getting the 38. Is there a generation of super skinny wristed men out there?
I don't have large wrists. Thin guy. And the 38 looked too small on me. I'm amazed at all the men who are getting the 38. Is there a generation of super skinny wristed men out there?
What is your definition of "not a large wrist"?
7 inches? I think 7 inches should be the starting point for a 42, to at least look proportional. Shoot tbh, at 7 inches, I think the 38 would still be a better fit watch than the 42.
I agree with AbeFrohman, the white vs black makes a difference when deciding on size. Not only that but the white band with 38 in store is using the S/M band when then black band with 42 is M/L which cause more overlap of the band which I believe causes the top of the band to not sit as flush on your wrist.
I'm hoping I'll be good with my 42 SG Sport with my 160-165mm wrist.
With the limited color and band sizes available at my try-on appointment, I wasn't completely satisfied with the experience.
My wrist is just about 7" (and I'm 5'8" 160lb) on the dot and the 38mm looked so feminine on my wrist. My gf and the Apple employee agreed. I have a 42 on order (July ship ahhh) and did a try on over the weekend just to make sure the 42 wouldn't be huge, and it was perfect. Their size looks so different in person compared to pictures.