The top apps list is constantly changing. A fraud app might be number 900 on the list of top 1000 but could have spent days or weeks in the top 10 where it got massive exposure from Apple.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Study Finds Up to 2% of Top 1,000 Paid Apps on App Store Were Scams
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
The top apps list is constantly changing. A fraud app might be number 900 on the list of top 1000 but could have spent days or weeks in the top 10 where it got massive exposure from Apple.
No one is forcing you to buy anything from Apple. Don't like it, go get a job!
When I think "scam", I'm thinking of an app that captures my bank and cc information, or my login and password information for other accounts.
Selling me a VPN or a QR scanner I don't need is limited to the $5 subscription fee - Apple's security measures keep the apps from reaching through any further.
I am a developer and have made my living from Mac software since 1992. A one-time fee does not really work. If you had bought my main product in 1992, I would have worked an additional 29 years providing upgrades for free. Apple does not support an upgrade model so IAP is the only economically viable way to handle revenue.
I base it on absolutely nothing. I thought the context of my post was clearly a conjectural supposition. I just think apple needs to provide a path forward, however it is effectuated.
You’re introducing an assumption into the equation. I’m just using the numbers given in the article. In the population of 1000 apps, we know 98% are not scams.
It’s easy to post conjectures. I could say the percentage of scam apps is higher for apps outside the top 1000 since getting on that list is a difficult accomplishment. The average person isn’t just going to download apps from this list, so their chance of getting scammed could be much worse.
That also seems like a fair recommendation. However they do it, it’s clear apple needs to provide a path towards it. But I also think we will find issues with people using these alternate payments and then expecting apple to provide refunds.
Time to finally understand, that "walled gardens" exist not for your security, but solely for the "gardener's" profit.
the problem two choices
1. advert - not good new ios
2. in apps - 99 cents pure cheap but still a lot of people complain so pricy while dev cost so high.
me , trying in apps purchase my current project and advert in android version.
And if the App Store didn’t exist and there were third party app stores or any app could be loaded directly from the developer, the numbers would be flipped 98% scams and 2% real! People saying it’s not an issue on Mac or PC software have never tried searching for apps other than mainstream apps. Try and search for an computer app that will convert video files for example. They are all scammy.
Actually you can offer a one-time purchase for your apps. You can just offer different versions, 2.0, 3.0 etc. each better than the other with added functionality. Minor updates are of course free. Similar to what the developers of Firecore (Infuse) is doing.
“Apple leads the industry with practices that put the safety of our customers first…”
Until Apple implements end-to-end encryption of iCloud backups and lifetime bans for app developers violating “do not track” requests, this is just marketing speak. C’mon Apple, prove me wrong!
Until Apple implements end-to-end encryption of iCloud backups and lifetime bans for app developers violating “do not track” requests, this is just marketing speak. C’mon Apple, prove me wrong!
This is a work around, but it’s not ideal for devs that want to offer a cheaper upgrade path for their current customers.
FFmpeg. It's been around for over 20 years, converts anything to anything, and is free and open-source. I use it on the regular, both on Mac and Linux. FFmpeg is like the swiss army knife of video format conversion. Tons of internet tutorials available on how to use.
A direct competitor of one of my apps is essentially a fake review warehouse. It’s really incredible.
the point word is scam. Appl user dont like scam like in android and they would buy in app purchase while in android nobody scare of scam because mostly nobody would paid a dime for an app.I’m confused why you quoted me?
I wish you good luck developing your app
Thumbs up to open-source software! Wouldn’t it be cool if we could download open source software on iOS?
A competitor of my app offers the app for free with in app purchases. I offer mine as a paid app. Guess what: I’m switching to in app purchases within the next year even though I really don‘t want to do it. The problem is that people see “free” and immediately download it and make the in app purchase. Many of those some users flat out ignore paid apps. I really hate in app purchases but it is the only way for many apps to gain any traction at all.
It makes Apple look bad, makes the AppStore less trust worthy(meaning less sales), makes their argument for taking a 30% cut to ensure customer protection invalid. There is a lot of incentive for Apple to take down scams app, it could cost them a lot more in the long term to keep them up.
So 20 out of 1000 apps were scams?
Doesn’t make the 30% cut invalid because more than 20 out of 1000 could have been scams if they didn’t take the 30%. At any rate apple is entitled to charge what it wants within the law.
business decision . one time 19.90 dollar sooo pricy while free app with in app purchase 19.90 cheap.