Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm still interested, but I'm hoping it's not anything bigger than 9 or 10". The brief rumor that floated a couple weeks ago said they were prototyping a 15", and that's just too damn big.
 
I currently don't see how even an Apple tablet could have broad appeal - it seems like a niche product. However at one time I said similar things about the Macbook Air. Then I used one; and now I own one and LOVE it. :D So who knows, a tablet-ish device done right might appeal to a lot of people - but if Apple does release one, I really doubt it's going to be a tablet computer in the typical sense of the term (and that's a good thing).
 
I've got $800 stuffed in a mattress, either I get a tablet when announced, or wait until I can raise the difference for a PB 13".

Of course, it would depend on _what_ was actually announced...
 
I'm curious as to who the target Market is for a tablet, and what they will be using it for. It doesn't have the benefit of a laptop as it probably has no physical keyboard, and it doesn't have the size benefit of a touchscreen mobile phone. I think an Apple tablet will fit in a similar niche as the MacBook Air.

No. If it exists, it will most likely fit nearly the same niche as the iPod Touch... except for people who need reading glasses or who want to see bigger web pages and apps.

That's my guess.
 
In the US they hover around 10% as you stated, but that's why I used the word worldwide in bold.

due to the decades of underfunding of education in the us, most citizens knowadays believe that "world" is an entity consisting of both east and west cost. those who follow baseball may include parts of canada as well.
 
due to the decades of underfunding of education in the us, most citizens knowadays believe that "world" is an entity consisting of both east and west cost. those who follow baseball may include parts of canada as well.

Hehe . . .
 
I'm hearing three different arguments here, and oddly, one of them shows numbers far higher than most other analysts care to report (and all Windows zealots will refuse to acknowledge.)

You can argue that with IDC and Gartner, chief.
 
This article doesn't specify, but I've seen numerous articles pegging Apple at hovering near the 10% mark.

http://www.tuaw.com/2009/01/02/apple-market-share-tops-10-windows-share-lowest-since-tracking/

They are still around 3.5% worldwide. This slide isn't up to date, but it shows their market share since 1998.

mac_sales_market_share_lg.gif

Though the latest Gartner report doesn't state Apple's market share as they don't feature in the top 5, they obviously have a smaller share than Toshiba's 5%.

2Q09 Worldwide.png

It is in the US where they do really well, up to 8.7% in the last quarter.

2Q09 USA.png
 
I wonder if this Apple tablet thing is something that fans just cooked up. I need something from Apple. Everyone wants an Apple tablet. Will we get it?
 
They are still around 3.5% worldwide. This slide isn't up to date, but it shows their market share since 1998.

View attachment 195830

Though the latest Gartner report doesn't state Apple's market share as they don't feature in the top 5, they obviously have a smaller share than Toshiba's 5%.

View attachment 195831

It is in the US where they do really well, up to 8.7% in the last quarter.

View attachment 195832

This is exactly why I questioned the charts in this article. Nobody else is reporting Apple's sales anywhere near as high. But then, at the same time, maybe they're being paid by someone to report lower numbers? If so, whoever it is must have some awfully deep pockets.
 
This is exactly why I questioned the charts in this article. Nobody else is reporting Apple's sales anywhere near as high. But then, at the same time, maybe they're being paid by someone to report lower numbers? If so, whoever it is must have some awfully deep pockets.

Market share reporting is tricky because the definition of a given market is a moving target. If you look at Apple's market share worldwide, it's going to be different than in the U.S. Likewise, it's going to look different if you look at just consumer/home users versus the entire market (i.e., including business where Apple traditionally doesn't compete much at all.)
 
I wonder if this Apple tablet thing is something that fans just cooked up. I need something from Apple. Everyone wants an Apple tablet. Will we get it?

You got an iPod.
You got an iPod Touch.
You got an iPhone.
You got all kinds of Macbooks.

Apple is in the business of giving you cool and useful things. Not years from now, but today. Come next year, and you'll see Apple shaking things up again. I mean, this is Steve Jobs plus his team we're talking about. Same ones that gave you all that other good stuff. Nothing has changed at Apple.
 
I'm hearing three different arguments here, and oddly, one of them shows numbers far higher than most other analysts care to report (and all Windows zealots will refuse to acknowledge.)

So many other 'market analysts' have been holding Apple's computer sales in the US to well under 10% per quarter when compared to all other manufacturers. However, this chart seems to specifically note that not only are Apple's computer sales much higher than the average report, but at 25%, more than twice as high as even the most liberal report for the laptops. Even the 17% for desktops seems almost twice that reported by other analysts. Who's right? Is this taking into account the sub-notebooks popularly called netbooks? Or are those a different category not included in the general term of 'computers?'

As said above, it's very difficult to measure. Apple may not sell many, but they grab a huge share of the profit. They're one of the world's highest profiting computer companies. Maybe they're overly highly marked up, but there are plenty of people willing to pay that.

Diamonds are worth no more than £5 to me, but other people will pay £50,000 for a 2 gram diamond, so that sets their market value.

Another difficult factor is that traditionally Apple computers last far longer than Windows computers. I still see print shops, design companies aand orther organisations with iMac G4s (the 'lamp' design) and G4 PowerMacs (graphite case) in use daily. A Windows PC of the same age would have been thrown out long ago.

Some people say Apple last 2x longer or even 3x longer, meaning if you want to count the total number of people using Apple, long term Apple sales figures should be tripled compared to PCs to get an idea of how many Apples are still being used. Sorry if that wasn't very clear, but I hope you get the idea. As usual, take this with a handful of salt.
 
I can't wait for the tablet. I want something larger than the iPhone that I can carry around with me around the house, and I want it to be smaller than a laptop. I want something book-sized that I can set next to my Cheerios, swiping pages with my left hand while I shovel whole grains in my mouth with the other.

I don't want to pay 180 bucks every 6 months for daily newspaper delivery. I want to read the paper on my tablet, and I want to read books on my tablet, and what I really really really want is a tablet that uses something like the Pixel Qi technology that switches back and forth between e-ink and lcd, or something like the Microsoft mock-ups that show two screens -- one lcd and one e-ink would be nice.

A combo display lcd/e-ink could be the killer killer app. Books are going to be effing huge on this thing. G'bye B & N.

I just saw a Sony commercial, I think during The Good Wife, advertising their e-book reader. This tablet could be very, very big.

The tablet will transmit media for the user to consume -- movies, browsing, books, music, games. That will be its only function, although I'm sure it will include "lite" software like email, iCal, maybe Pages, etc.

The device will not be for productivity. Leave that to the iMacs and MBPs.

I want books electronically. I want movies on that bigger screen, for the long car ride or the plane or the long line at the neighborhood BMV. I want to carry it around with me. I want it, I want it, I want it. :)

I think people that say that they don't want an "oversized" iPod Touch will be quite surprised to find out, rather quickly that in fact a giant Touch is exactly what they want after all.

Carried from room to room to room, wi fi connectivity, the internet everywhere. The real internet -- on a screen sized for consumption -- not a tiny screen that will quickly become merely what everyone "makes do" with when they're on the go and choose not to take the tablet with them.

Can't wait.
 
I've long viewed the iPhone as the "gateway drug" that will make PC users more comfortable with making the switch to a Mac, even desiring making the switch sooner due to the positive iPhone experience. I'm sure there are some Apple executives who would acknowledge that this is part of the Apple strategy.



Thats why I came to Mac over a year ago :D

Now I have a Imac, Macbook Pro, and other :apple: Products
 
Are they trying to justify the production of the new tablets? What they dont understand about this new tablet? Start making those damn tablets, I will buy 4 of them pre-order!
 
Well whaddayaknow...

... people are finally getting a clue. Apple's product manage to do something none of the other makers have done--made computing efficient, easy and fun, all in one package.

In my personal opinion, an Apple tablet, made as forward thinking as every Apple product this century, will probably make every other device currently being announced look klunky and worthless once it hits the market.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.