Swan M10 Unboxing & Review (Updated)

[nyguy4u]

They also sound fairly decent, but that's secondary.

Them sounding "decent" is a pretty broad statement. I guess it's all relative to what people perceive as decent. If I'm buying a speaker set for over $100, I don't want it to be "decent", I want it to be GREAT.

They aren't very loud actually, compared to most 2.1 systems they aren't loud at all. If you were an audiophile you probably wouldn't be using the Bose either. Your comments below about RCA cables would also lead me to believe there are some problems, but keep going. I'm not an audiophile btw.

Yes, I am an audiophile, and while I do hate Bose, they do sound better than Swan. Why would my comments about RCA cables lead to a problem? No one uses RCA anymore.

Couldn't be further from the case

That was a response to my comment about the bass being muddy. That actually IS the case. The bass is barely there, and when it's there - it's very muddy. All the reviews on these speakers share my opinion on this.

As an audiophile, you should know that most DAC's use an RCA connection, furthermore you would never use a computer soundcard. What inputs would you like, I can't think of a single computer speaker that uses something closer to analog. They include a RCA to 1/8th inch cable, which is what most computers have. There would be no point in using the computer 5.1/7.1 system as they have no need for the additional channels. I suppose they could use a TOS link cable, but an RCA allows hook-up to other electronic devices.

As an audiophile, if you were using a DAC, you wouldn't be using a Swan M10's - you'd be using a far more professional speaker than a Swan. Perhaps Boston Acoustic, or similar.

Bose headphones way three times what a pair of Shure's do. This isn't really a good argument.

Disagree. When it comes to speakers, a good rule of thumb is that if they are heavy, they have a better magnet, thus better sound. The heavier, the better.

Once again, this has nothing to do with sound quality or loudness. My father's Fender Tube amp with Jensen 12's has less then 50 watts, it's louder then any other speaker in his house.

If that's the case, than I'd recommend getting a better pair of speakers in your house! Especially if Jensen's are out powering them.


No disrespect towards Swan, they are decent speakers - but not for the price. Anyone who holds them can instantly feel that they are light, and just have a cheap feel to them. Are you aware that these exact speakers sell in China for only $40? They are very basic entry level speakers, in a nice plastic housing, and it has people fooled.

People who buy these speakers aren't doing their research. You can buy M-Audio AV40's, same price, better bass response, higher wattage, and just better made speakers, and get this.. for the same price!!

 

[thegoldenmackid]

So are these speakers good? After nyguy4u, recently returned his set...I question if I have made the right purchase for my new iMac. It does come down to how you enjoy the sound right? Assure me friends.

Look through this thread and find those that are disappointed, or just look around the internets and find complaints, they are rare. You could also look at the lack of logic that exists in nyguy4u's points, but that's another story.


nyguy4u - you have been called out, if you want any credibility you are going to need to respond to every one of my points, particularly the ones in bold, which you oddly missed in your first rebuttal. Don't throw around the a-word without actually having some knowledge.

Them sounding "decent" is a pretty broad statement. I guess it's all relative to what people perceive as decent. If I'm buying a speaker set for over $100, I don't want it to be "decent", I want it to be GREAT.

As an audiophile, you would know that $100 for anything other then cables is a joke. A $100 pair of headphones aren't going to sound great, especially without an amp. If you were an audiophile, you would not be using computer speakers to do much of anything, if anything you'd be using headphones or you would have a proper system.

Yes, I am an audiophile, and while I do hate Bose, they do sound better than Swan. Why would my comments about RCA cables lead to a problem? No one uses RCA anymore.

Really now, what do you use at home and what would you prefer Swan to use? I'm pretty sure that most high-end cables are either RCA or XLR, at least in my experience. Once again, not an audiophile,, just own some headphones and a KRK museum.

That was a response to my comment about the bass being muddy. That actually IS the case. The bass is barely there, and when it's there - it's very muddy. All the reviews on these speakers share my opinion on this.

Barely any of the reviews agree with you on this. I found two in the first page of Google, one was review on a blog, the other a forum post. The former described the bass as "muddy," but less muddy. Most reviews that showed up in the search compared the Swans to other computer speakers and described how it was not muddy or less muddy.

As an audiophile, if you were using a DAC, you wouldn't be using a Swan M10's - you'd be using a far more professional speaker than a Swan. Perhaps Boston Acoustic, or similar.

Well, I have a DAC or two and the Swan M10's. At my home, remember we aren't audiophiles, we don't use Boston Acoustics, we prefer B&W - maybe it's the case that B&W is a brand not for audiophiles. That's far from my point:
Audiophiles use DAC's
DAC's use RCA
Swan's use RCA
(That seems to be a good point)

You gave yourself away though:

As for input, RCA inputs? What popular sound cards have RCA outputs? That is ridiculous.

1. I have established RCA is the preferred use by a lot of high end things
2. No Audiophile would ever use a soundcard, let alone anything digital
3. You provide no alternative.
4. You wouldn't use anything "popular"

Disagree. When it comes to speakers, a good rule of thumb is that if they are heavy, they have a better magnet, thus better sound. The heavier, the better.

A good rule of thumb is how they sound, not what they weigh.

If that's the case, than I'd recommend getting a better pair of speakers in your house! Especially if Jensen's are out powering them.

Go test a pair, get back to me on loudness.

No disrespect towards Swan, they are decent speakers - but not for the price.

Your Bose speakers cost three times the price, name a single pair of $100 speakers that sound better

Anyone who holds them can instantly feel that they are light, and just have a cheap feel to them.

Once again, that's a personal preference/opinion. Sound over weight any day of the week.

Are you aware that these exact speakers sell in China for only $40?

Nope, I learn new things every day, maybe you should read a book regarding audio cables though.

They are very basic entry level speakers, in a nice plastic housing, and it has people fooled.

They also sound good, but "shhh"

People who buy these speakers aren't doing their research. You can buy M-Audio AV40's, same price, better bass response, higher wattage, and just better made speakers, and get this.. for the same price!!

They aren't better speakers and the bass comparison is problematic for you

 

[nyguy4u]

Look through this thread and find those that are disappointed, or just look around the internets and find complaints, they are rare. You could also look at the lack of logic that exists in nyguy4u's points, but that's another story.

I have looked through this thread, and no.. I haven't found many disappointed. But, that leads me to believe that most here aren't in the professional audio field, and just don't know any better. Not sure where you are trying to go with that? Lack of logic?.. not really. I am not stating opinions, I am stating facts.

As an audiophile, you would know that $100 for anything other then cables is a joke. A $100 pair of headphones aren't going to sound great, especially without an amp. If you were an audiophile, you would not be using computer speakers to do much of anything, if anything you'd be using headphones or you would have a proper system.

The fact that I have my own recording studio, teach seminars, and do this as a living for over 20 years, yes... I think it's safe to say that I am an audiophile. With that said, of course anything around the $100 mark is a joke. Who said otherwise? Again.. not sure where you are going there. What I said however if you read my post, is that there is a TON of better options, in the same price point. I gave an example of M-Audio products. Again, who said I use computer speakers for a primary source? Again, what's your point? I use Bose for my personal computer. For one of my studios, I use a Genelec
1032AM Active Studio Monitor, paired with a Allen & Heath mixing board. Obviously a pair of Sennheiser headphones will sound better than anything in the $100 price point though. That's common sense.

Really now, what do you use at home and what would you prefer Swan to use? I'm pretty sure that most high-end cables are either RCA or XLR, at least in my experience. Once again, not an audiophile,, just own some headphones and a KRK museum.

I've already stated what I'd prefer people to use over Swan. M-Audio is just one of many.

Barely any of the reviews agree with you on this. I found two in the first page of Google, one was review on a blog, the other a forum post. The former described the bass as "muddy," but less muddy. Most reviews that showed up in the search compared the Swans to other computer speakers and described how it was not muddy or less muddy.

Actually many agree with me on this. A simple Google search will show that. I also found some reviews on YouTube stating the same. A pair of 2.1 Pro Media Klipsch's are even better than Swan!

Well, I have a DAC or two and the Swan M10's. At my home, remember we aren't audiophiles, we don't use Boston Acoustics, we prefer B&W - maybe it's the case that B&W is a brand not for audiophiles. That's far from my point:
Audiophiles use DAC's
DAC's use RCA
Swan's use RCA
(That seems to be a good point)

If you use a DAC with a Swan M10, then I am sorry to hear that. We aren't audiophilies?.. correction.. YOU aren't an audiophile. I know of many professional recording studios that use Boston Acoustic - what are you talking about?! I know DAC's use RCA's - again, what's your point?

1. I have established RCA is the preferred use by a lot of high end things
2. No Audiophile would ever use a soundcard, let alone anything digital
3. You provide no alternative.
4. You wouldn't use anything "popular"

1 - That's pretty much established every where. Although, it's not completely preferred. Some would rather use USB, including myself.
2 - Completely untrue.
3 - I did, USB
4 -huh?

A good rule of thumb is how they sound, not what they weigh.

You're right, by you saying that you're definitely not an audiophile. Most audiophiles look at the weight of a speaker most and foremost. If they are light, stay away. I just showed that comment to a co-worker of mine, who's been in the sound engineering field for over 30 years, and almost fell out of the chair in laughter at your comment.

Go test a pair, get back to me on loudness.

No need to. Jensen's are crap. Loudness is complete opposite of clarity. Hell, I can jack up an old pair of $50 Pioneer tower speakers, will they be loud?.. sure. Will they be clear.. hell no.

Your Bose speakers cost three times the price, name a single pair of $100 speakers that sound better

I did, M-Audio.

Once again, that's a personal preference/opinion. Sound over weight any day of the week.

No, that's fact. Once again, my co-worker fell off his chair laughing. You have no idea what you're talking about. Do some research, then get back to me.

Nope, I learn new things every day, maybe you should read a book regarding audio cables though.

No need to, I make my own.


Look, it's obvious that I backed you up into a corner with facts, thus why you are so defensive. You're comeback? - you either say things that I never said to begin with, or you're just stating irrelevant things. Your comeback is that I'm not an audiophile. That's laughable. Think whatever you'd like. I won't lose sleep over someone who doesn't think I am. It's also apparent that you are a Swan fanboy, or don't want to admit that you purchased $100 speakers, that sell for $35 in China, and cost $15 to produce.

 

[thegoldenmackid]

I have looked through this thread, and no.. I haven't found many disappointed. But, that leads me to believe that most here aren't in the professional audio field, and just don't know any better. Not sure where you are trying to go with that? Lack of logic?.. not really. I am not stating opinions, I am stating facts.

Umm, no you are stating random opinions without much facts. Your "muddy" comments only prove this further. You are right, most aren't in the professional audio field. If they were:
A. They'd be spending more then $100
B. They'd be buying monitors
C. They wouldn't be asking for help, especially here

The fact that I have my own recording studio, teach seminars, and do this as a living for over 20 years, yes...

Help us...

I think it's safe to say that I am an audiophile.

Just because you own some equipment and are old doesn't mean you are an audiophile. Sure, my family has some McIntosh amps, but does my mother know anything about them, no.

With that said, of course anything around the $100 mark is a joke.

If it was a joke, why'd you buy $100 speakers? If you were an audiophile, you would not be buying computer speakers, you definitely would not be "satisfied" with Bose.

Who said otherwise? Again.. not sure where you are going there. What I said however if you read my post, is that there is a TON of better options, in the same price point. I gave an example of M-Audio products.

Later on, you name one. One ≠ tons.

Again, who said I use computer speakers for a primary source? Again, what's your point? I use Bose for my personal computer.

I never said that, but audiophiles wouldn't even use Bose for their personal computer.

For one of my studios, I use a Genelec
1032AM Active Studio Monitor, paired with a Allen & Heath mixing board.

Wow, someone did a price sort on Music123.

Obviously a pair of Sennheiser headphones will sound better than anything in the $100 price point though. That's common sense.

Glad to see there is some logic

I've already stated what I'd prefer people to use over Swan. M-Audio is just one of many.

You keep saying "many" you only list one and it's not exactly the greatest of responses.

Actually many agree with me on this. A simple Google search will show that. I also found some reviews on YouTube stating the same.

YouTube, really? I can put my review on YouTube. I did a simple test of your "muddy" comment, it came up with two results, but I already stated that...

A pair of 2.1 Pro Media Klipsch's are even better than Swan!

Too bad you can't hear anything except the excessive bass. They are better for certain purposes and desires, I have never denied that. Accuracy wise, the Swan's are much better.

If you use a DAC with a Swan M10, then I am sorry to hear that.

Okay? Much better then no DAC, I just use a controller.

We aren't audiophilies?.. correction.. YOU aren't an audiophile.

Never claimed to be one...

I know of many professional recording studios that use Boston Acoustic - what are you talking about?!

To my knowledge, Boston doesn't make any nearfield speakers. They design home theater and car products, why would anyone in a studio use a floorstanding speaker to monitor?

I know DAC's use RCA's - again, what's your point?

You seem to have a vendetta against RCA, the preferred choice in high-end audio.

1 - That's pretty much established every where. Although, it's not completely preferred. Some would rather use USB, including myself.

Your over your head buddy. Digital isn't referring to the type of connection, rather the sound itself. Analog v. Digital.

2 - Completely untrue.

See the above post, you missed the chapter on analog v. digital. What do you think a DAC is? Secondly, you are going to need some external power if you are an audiophile, so you probably aren't using a soundcard. Lastly, most USB soundcards have RCA outputs and finally the Swans include the two most common connections for computers: RCA and 1/8th".

3 - I did, USB

Really. Your Allen & Heath mixer has outputs for USB speakers?

4 -huh?

What audiophile is going to use a Creative soundcard?

You're right, by you saying that you're definitely not an audiophile. Most audiophiles look at the weight of a speaker most and foremost. If they are light, stay away. I just showed that comment to a co-worker of mine, who's been in the sound engineering field for over 30 years, and almost fell out of the chair in laughter at your comment.

You mean an employee, you own the studio? I'd say most audiophiles prefer sound: sound over weight, FTW. Just look most people concerned with speed, prefer speed over horsepower. Even if one is directly related to the end and desired result, it seems the end is always preferred over the means.

No need to. Jensen's are crap. Loudness is complete opposite of clarity.

Yeah, might want to reexamine that. We are talking Jensen tubes circa 1950s, not some mass manufactured product from Vietnam.

Hell, I can jack up an old pair of $50 Pioneer tower speakers, will they be loud?.. sure. Will they be clear.. hell no.

You are the one with the watts fetish. Watts have nothing even less to do with clarity then they do loudness.

No, that's fact. Once again, my co-worker fell off his chair laughing. You have no idea what you're talking about. Do some research, then get back to me.

Why don't you post a YouTube video of him doing so...

No need to, I make my own.

Can i have the blogspot link.

Look, it's obvious that I backed you up into a corner with facts,

ROFLs,

thus why you are so defensive. You're comeback? - you either say things that I never said to begin with, or you're just stating irrelevant things.

No, I use the quote button and checked your facts out. I don't make claims about how "tons", fact check yourself buddy, and not with your own book

Your comeback is that I'm not an audiophile. That's laughable. Think whatever you'd like. I won't lose sleep over someone who doesn't think I am.

You would have lost a lot of sleep by now

It's also apparent that you are a Swan fanboy, or don't want to admit that you purchased $100 speakers, that sell for $35 in China, and cost $15 to produce.

Well I might be a Swan fanboy, my sig shows my real love is KRK, and not the VXT crap, the Series I, when they were made in Long Beach. That's really irrelevant, I'm supposed to be mad about buying overpriced speakers, you, the audiophile, bought Bose? That's worth laughing about.

Also use the quote feature, not html, it's much cleaner.

 

[SchneiderMan]

Do you have them with a sub connected? are they in need of one? I would guess it would be more expensive to get a good sub for them. Sorry but i did not read the whole thread, what are the connection they have? thanks

 

[thegoldenmackid]

Do you have them with a sub connected? are they in need of one? I would guess it would be more expensive to get a good sub for them. Sorry but i did not read the whole thread, what are the connection they have? thanks

They are a 2.1 system. They feature standard RCA connections for both the satellites and the input, they come with a RCA to 1/8th" cable for ease with a standard headphone jack.

Reading is good btw.​

 

[nyguy4u]

ok, it's obvious that I can't have a normal conversation with you. As I previously said, you either dodge the questions, or come back with a smart-a$$ comment back.

I just purchased Mackie M5 monitors for my other computer. I'll enjoy rich sound from these, as you enjoy your little $50 Swan "monitors" LOL

I just noticed on your public profile that you're only 18. No wonder you have no idea what you're talking about. Had I known this, I wouldn't have continued this conversation with you.

If it's one thing I dislike, it's ill-informed teenagers who think they know everything, when in reality - they have no clue.

I'm done talking to a kid who obviously has no idea what he's talking about. So, go ahead, and be a little kid and have the last word.

 

[thegoldenmackid]

ok, it's obvious that I can't have a normal conversation with you. As I previously said, you either dodge the questions, or come back with a smart-a$$ comment back.

Some other posters might come around, they can judge for themselves. My reputation precedes my age on here, thanks though.

I just purchased Mackie M5 monitors for my other computer. I'll enjoy rich sound from these, as you enjoy your little $50 Swan "monitors" LOL

Yeah, you clearly didn't see the part about the headphones or monitors that I own. Have fun with your intro Mackie monitors, I'll stick to my KRK E8Ts (amongst the V8 Series 1 and V88)

I just noticed on your public profile that you're only 18. No wonder you have no idea what you're talking about. Had I known this, I wouldn't have continued this conversation with you.

Look at the way I write. Look at the way I respond. Look how I capitalize things. Look how I don't make bold claims. I have made an effort to gain respect, despite the stereotypes about my age. I think that I have done a good job.

If it's one thing I dislike, it's ill-informed teenagers who think they know everything, when in reality - they have no clue.

Look in the mirror and get back to me. Just because you cannot respond doesn't mean you need to make excuses. I'm sorry you didn't know the difference between digital and analog or the wide-spread use of RCA cables.

I'm done talking to a kid who obviously has no idea what he's talking about. So, go ahead, and be a little kid and have the last word.

I'm always here, waiting for a response or an apology.

 

[-aggie-]

ok, it's obvious that I can't have a normal conversation with you. As I previously said, you either dodge the questions, or come back with a smart-a$$ comment back.

I just purchased Mackie M5 monitors for my other computer. I'll enjoy rich sound from these, as you enjoy your little $50 Swan "monitors" LOL

I just noticed on your public profile that you're only 18. No wonder you have no idea what you're talking about. Had I known this, I wouldn't have continued this conversation with you.

If it's one thing I dislike, it's ill-informed teenagers who think they know everything, when in reality - they have no clue.

I'm done talking to a kid who obviously has no idea what he's talking about. So, go ahead, and be a little kid and have the last word.

Just because he is 18 does not mean he can't think or have an opinion that is just as valid as our older members (who sometimes act like immature brats themselves). You're dismissing him out of hand for that is just insulting.

I would suggest you amend your response.

 

[buzzbuzzbuzz]

Has anyone's speakers shipped yet? I bought mine 10/13 and its just "processed" so far.

I was going to ask the same thing. I bought mine on 10/16 and it's been saying "processed" since Tuesday. For those who have ordered from the site, where do they ship from and do they update your order info?

I emailed Jon of The Audio Insider yesterday and he said that he would try to ship all backorders out by the end of today. I know that he is based in Reno, NV, so he still has a few hours to make good on that claim. The wait is soon ending!

Them sounding "decent" is a pretty broad statement. I guess it's all relative to what people perceive as decent. If I'm buying a speaker set for over $100, I don't want it to be "decent", I want it to be GREAT.
People who buy these speakers aren't doing their research. You can buy M-Audio AV40's, same price, better bass response, higher wattage, and just better made speakers, and get this.. for the same price!!

I'm really hoping that you don't return to this thread. thegoldenmackid can definitely come across as a bit of a jerk, but he knows what he is saying. Anyone who is swayed by all of your claims is ill-informed. Your story makes no sense, Mr. USB speakers-Genelec-GREAT $100 speakers. And contrary to your claims of not doing research, yours is the absolute first negative review of the Swans I've ever read, and I've been reading about these speakers for months because I can't afford to waste money. If you bought them expecting a true subwoofer and sound comparable to speakers that cost many times more, you need to rethink the concept of research.

If you do come back, feel free to point me in the direction of where they sell for $40 (or $35 since you can't make up your mind) in China.

 

[Fozzybadfeet]

I emailed Jon of The Audio Insider yesterday and he said that he would try to ship all backorders out by the end of today. I know that he is based in Reno, NV, so he still has a few hours to make good on that claim. The wait is soon ending!

Thank you for the update. Hopefully, I do get a confirmation that the speakers will be sent out.

As far as this "Sound Battle" is going on, I think thegoldenmackid knows what he's talking about. I did my research yesterday to support my choice in buying Swans and everyone who has purchased these speakers dating back to 2007 have said they are really good speakers for the price. SO, thegoldenmackid, thanks for all your help, if there any more questions that I may have in regards to sound related peripherals, I know you the words you speak is legit. Good stuff.

 

[g00dbye]

So, I have one more question. I understand that these speakers are RCA to 1/8" Headphone input, which plugs into your standard computer headphone jack. But because these speakers have no direct headphone input on them, does this mean that everytime time I want to wear headphones I have to unplug the speakers and plug my headphones in? I would find this slightly irritating as I use headphones and monitors about 50/50 all the while constantly plugging in and pulling out cords from the back of an iMac. Can anybody confirm this?

 

[thegoldenmackid]

So, I have one more question. I understand that these speakers are RCA to 1/8" Headphone input, which plugs into your standard computer headphone jack. But because these speakers have no direct headphone input on them, does this mean that everytime time I want to wear headphones I have to unplug the speakers and plug my headphones in? I would find this slightly irritating as I use headphones and monitors about 50/50 all the while constantly plugging in and pulling out cords from the back of an iMac. Can anybody confirm this?

The jerk has an answer: you would need to unplug them.

 

[g00dbye]

The jerk has an answer: you would need to unplug them.

Haha. I have to say, this forum debacle has gotten quite out of hand. But no matter. I appreciate everybody's input. A couple more questions. Would a device such as the Creative X-Fi Xmod work well in acting as a headphone/volume controller? I feel that it would make the hassle of switching between headphones and speakers much easier. What do you think?

Creative X-Fi Xmod

Lastly, does the volume knob on the sub control the entire system's Master Volume or just the sub woofer's volume? Thanks!

 

[thegoldenmackid]

Haha. I have to say, this forum debacle has gotten quite out of hand. But no matter. I appreciate everybody's input. A couple more questions. Would a device such as the Creative X-Fi Xmod work well in acting as a headphone/volume controller? I feel that it would make the hassle of switching between headphones and speakers much easier. What do you think?

Sounds like a perfect solution

Lastly, does the volume knob on the sub control the entire system's Master Volume or just the sub woofer's volume? Thanks!

There are two volume knobs:
Silver one on front: controls Master Volume
Knob on back: controls just subwoofer

 

[lostfan916]

Has anybody tried the D1080mkii? How do they relate to the M10s?

Was considering getting the M10s but then saw these and they're only $15 more. Trying to figure out which ones I should purchase.

 

[g00dbye]

Has anybody tried the D1080mkii? How do they relate to the M10s?

Was considering getting the M10s but then saw these and they're only $15 more. Trying to figure out which ones I should purchase.

I was wondering about these too. There are very nice in their own rite.

 

[thegoldenmackid]

Has anybody tried the D1080mkii? How do they relate to the M10s?

Was considering getting the M10s but then saw these and they're only $15 more. Trying to figure out which ones I should purchase.

I have:

It's a different sound and it's a matter of preference. I bought the M10s with the desire to get a sound that didn't have an earth-shattering bass, I got what I wanted. I would take the D1080MkII's over the M12's, if I wanted a more powerful low-end then the M10's.

They have a better low-end, but the lack of an external woofer means that oddly the M10's will have a louder bass. They are equal to better on the other ranges. If you aren't going to be able to get the midwoofer at near head-level, they are probably the better option.

 

[nyguy4u]

Look, I'm not going to get into a battle here. If you people want to buy M10's, great. If you don't, that's great too. If you want "decent" speakers, the M10 is for you. If you want GREAT speakers, don't get them. Why anyone would purchase the M10's over M-Audio products are insane. They are more powerful, with a better low end. But hey, what do I know.

If you want to take advice from an 18 year old who swears by Jensen speakers, over a professional in the recording business, that's fine too.

I am entitled to my opinion on the speakers. End of discussion.

 

[thegoldenmackid]

If you want to take advice from an 18 year old who swears by Jensen speakers, over a professional in the recording business, that's fine too.

I am entitled to my opinion on the speakers. End of discussion.

You are overstepping your bounds here. I never said I would take Jensen's over anything, I just said that a low-watt Jensen 12 was loud in response to the common misconception that higher watts = loudness. You are now just taking my quotes out of context. For example, this has also occurred:

I just purchased Mackie M5 monitors for my other computer. I'll enjoy rich sound from these, as you enjoy your little $50 Swan "monitors" LOL

When did I ever call the Swans monitors?


The truth is: you are just copping out. I called you out in numerous places including, but not limited to:
1. Digital vs. Analog
2. RCA Alternative Connections
3. Lack of evidence

You didn't respond to any of them. What's the name of your studio, I'd love to stop by and checking out the set-up. You might be an audiophile, you might not - in the end it's just a name, there is no test. I tend to think that I am helpful and knowledgeable in certain areas, computer speakers may be one of them. I would never try to explain to someone the intricacies of televisions, I know little about that. I will admit when I am wrong and when I make a mistake, but I will stick to what has been said, not arbitrary facts regarding age.

I can assure you that I am not the only one who would wish that you respond to my claims. There are plenty of people who have read over the exchange of posts and I'm sure learned a thing or two about audio or at least gone to do their own research. Given your experience, it would only seem appropriate and helpful if you respond and provide offer some evidence to set what are apparently my misinformed ideas regarding audio.

 

[CubeHacker]

I think what we need at this point is for some of the other people who purchased their speakers here to chime in and let us know their opinion on how it sounds, rather than just having the same two people argue their personal opinions back and forth.

 

[iCheddar]

Does anyone know what the warranty is on the Swans?

Let me first say, I picked up a set about a year ago, and they're the best computer speakers I've ever owned, great little speakers.

Next, I've developed slight buzzing in all the speakers, especially the left channel. Futzing around with the input and output cables, as well as with my surge protectors, the buzz doesn't seem to be coming from an external force.

Its been just short of a year, does Swans have a warranty on these things? I'd love to get em fixed before my year is up.

Let it be known, I shot off emails just tonight to both The Audio Insider and to Swans, but figured I'd ask a question here as well.

 

[nyguy4u]

Does anyone know what the warranty is on the Swans?

Let me first say, I picked up a set about a year ago, and they're the best computer speakers I've ever owned, great little speakers.

Next, I've developed slight buzzing in all the speakers, especially the left channel. Futzing around with the input and output cables, as well as with my surge protectors, the buzz doesn't seem to be coming from an external force.

Its been just short of a year, does Swans have a warranty on these things? I'd love to get em fixed before my year is up.

Let it be known, I shot off emails just tonight to both The Audio Insider and to Swans, but figured I'd ask a question here as well.

Wow, just short of a year, and you're having issues already?

Who woulda thunk that cheap speakers made in China would be quality made

 

[Fozzybadfeet]

This is getting funny. Well I still haven't received any update on my purchase of the M10s. Hopefully I from them soon.

 

[SchneiderMan]

They are a 2.1 system. They feature standard RCA connections for both the satellites and the input, they come with a RCA to 1/8th" cable for ease with a standard headphone jack.

Reading is good btw.​

Thanks, if Amazon sold them i would have purchased them already.
Yes reading is very good, but not so much when i have a migraine at work.